Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF missing a trick?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF missing a trick?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th May 2018, 14:42
  #21 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Wander00
Lossiemouth THEN Mt Pleasant.......
Hardly a fair comparison, one is a barren, remote airfield in the middle of a cultural wasteland, hours from civilization, and the other is in the South Atlantic.
Two's in is offline  
Old 13th May 2018, 14:49
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
"Lossiemouth? Is that a place?"

BEagle is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 06:15
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Anglia
Posts: 2,076
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
The problem with most comments on here is that they are in the main only aircrew related and in general ignorance of anything else outside their Mess.
Most aircraft trades have been decimated for years but denied by PC statements on-Station, within MOD and at Parliament. Even Contractor help is withdrawn in some places - I assume it is a similar trait across all the technical and support trades. The current dire straits are perfectly illuminated by the call for local ex-tradesmen to join up again as “Dads Air Force” Recruits. The RAF Trick was missed years ago by commercial attitudes to MOD training requirements - i.e. training budget is reduced first.
Rigga is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 06:29
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rigga
The problem with most comments on here is that they are in the main only aircrew related and in general ignorance of anything else outside their Mess.
Most aircraft trades have been decimated for years but denied by PC statements on-Station, within MOD and at Parliament. Even Contractor help is withdrawn in some places - I assume it is a similar trait across all the technical and support trades. The current dire straits are perfectly illuminated by the call for local ex-tradesmen to join up again as “Dads Air Force” Recruits. The RAF Trick was missed years ago by commercial attitudes to MOD training requirements - i.e. training budget is reduced first.
Same in most UK industries TBH

First the R&D budget goes, then training, then maintenance, then recruitment and finally travel.............. (the "we can save this Billion $ company by stopping people going to see a customer in Bristol" syndrome)

Oddly bonuses and share otions are never cut
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 13:17
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NCA recruitment is in dire straits
This caught my eye (coz I was one once). May I politely ask for an elaboration? Is it a recruitment or training funnel problem (or both)?
The Old Fat One is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 13:33
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 4 Civvy Street. Nowhere-near-a-base. The Shires.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well I heard recently the contractor has said that no-one asked them to train NCA so it could be 2022 before they're ready.

Those face to face meetings I had with them 4 or 5 years ago never happened then?

The kids flying training sorties on Avenger are figments of my imagination too, I expect.
camelspyyder is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 15:19
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Exeter
Age: 61
Posts: 75
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it would bee good though if they did a 21st century version of Fighter Pilot and Test Pilot which were great in the 70's and I'm sure did wonders for recruitment and the RAF in general.

What about a fly-on-the-wall documentary following the build up of aircrew on the F35?

I'm sure there at plenty of other opportunities for a fly-on-the-wall documentary which if done correctly could be great for the service.

If the TV company are making the documentary surely they carry the costs not the MOD/RAF

Last edited by N.HEALD; 14th May 2018 at 15:20. Reason: Lousy typing (again)
N.HEALD is offline  
Old 15th May 2018, 14:26
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The real world
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rigga
The problem with most comments on here is that they are in the main only aircrew related and in general ignorance of anything else outside their Mess.
Most aircraft trades have been decimated for years but denied by PC statements on-Station, within MOD and at Parliament. Even Contractor help is withdrawn in some places - I assume it is a similar trait across all the technical and support trades. The current dire straits are perfectly illuminated by the call for local ex-tradesmen to join up again as “Dads Air Force” Recruits. The RAF Trick was missed years ago by commercial attitudes to MOD training requirements - i.e. training budget is reduced first.
Largely I suspect due to the fact that most users on here are or were aircrew?
I don't doubt that there are recruitment issues across the board, I would like to think like the latest RN programme about Queen Elizabeth carrier any programme done about the RAF would cover a broad scope of trades and characters. If ever done however I wouldn't bank on it!
Jayand is offline  
Old 15th May 2018, 17:19
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,235
Received 51 Likes on 20 Posts
There was the superb series Rescue about the Lossiemouth SAR flight back in the early 1990s but the only other series I can think about was the Sky one about Brize Norton three or four years ago. I would agree that the Navy are far more switched on about TV PR, and the RAF -particularly in this year- really ought to do better.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 15th May 2018, 19:20
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,371
Received 553 Likes on 151 Posts
May I be blunt?!

Army do soldiering and tanks.

Navy do ships.

Air Force do planes (as far as the public is concerned that means fighters).

There have been two series that I can think of in the not so distant past about jets. There was Combat Pilot (I think that was the name) filmed at Valley in 2003 (I can be seen briefly in the background trying to get out of shot - I’ve never liked the idea of being on TV) and then the Lossie GR4 OCU programme a few years later. You can also add the aforementioned Brize programme to the list.

Maybe the TV companies think there have been enough jet programmes recently and that if it’s not a programme about jets, then what’s the point? I mean, seriously, who is going to watch a programme about admin or suppliers?

I know that sounds mean and flippant and will just serve to perpetuate the image of an arrogant FJ pilot, but am I wrong?!

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 15th May 2018, 19:33
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
Ah, Bob Viking, but what about the days when ...

The Army also had a Navy (RCT) and an Air Force (AAC)
The Navy also had an Army (RM) and an Air Force (FAA)
The RAF also had a Navy (Marine Branch) and an Army (RAF Regt)

Now try and advertise that melange!!

Sadly it tends to be all about Aircrew ... especially FJ pilots.
MPN11 is offline  
Old 15th May 2018, 20:44
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Losing the yellow/red and gray helicopters was an interesting decision. Difficult choices were made and arguably sharper platforms had priority but this was a capability that can’t really be resurrected and a PR goldmine for the military. Yes yes I know the argument for core capability etc but we live in a media driven world now. Still, the Coastguard did well out of it. Every cloud.
drugsdontwork is offline  
Old 15th May 2018, 20:46
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: london
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MPN11
Ah, Bob Viking, but what about the days when ...

The Army also had a Navy (RCT) and an Air Force (AAC)
The Navy also had an Army (RM) and an Air Force (FAA)
The RAF also had a Navy (Marine Branch) and an Army (RAF Regt)

Now try and advertise that melange!!

Sadly it tends to be all about Aircrew ... especially FJ pilots.
Hooray!!!!
reallydeskbound is offline  
Old 15th May 2018, 22:24
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Maybe this (from over 50 years ago), brought up to date with the Typhoon?

BEagle is offline  
Old 16th May 2018, 07:26
  #35 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,142
Received 224 Likes on 66 Posts
Thanks, BEagle. That's the sort of thing that made me want to join. Luckily, my JP instructor reckoned the Lightning would be beyond me. He was almost certainly right. I'd have enjoyed the chance, but probably wouldn't be here today.
Herod is offline  
Old 16th May 2018, 16:01
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,925
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
While my instructor(s) advised me to steer well clear of the Lightning to avoid "climbing straight up to fly round in circles for 20 mins talking with your head stuck in a rubber bucket and then, if you haven't caught fire, had a hydraulic leak or run out of fuel, try to land." Only thing worse than that in their eyes was, heaven forfend, the V-Force!
pr00ne is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.