M-Baker to be homeless ?
Thread Starter

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 342
Likes: 5
From: West of Suez
M-Baker to be homeless ?
https://www.flyer.co.uk/battle-chalgrove-airport-hots/
The future for Chalgrove Airfield as an airfield looks bleak. Homes England, the government agency tasked with delivering new homes and jobs on publically owned sites in England, said this week that it would issue a Compulsory Purchase Order if the current tenants, Martin-Baker, refused to work with the agency.
The future for Chalgrove Airfield as an airfield looks bleak. Homes England, the government agency tasked with delivering new homes and jobs on publically owned sites in England, said this week that it would issue a Compulsory Purchase Order if the current tenants, Martin-Baker, refused to work with the agency.

Joined: May 2017
Posts: 110
Likes: 146
From: Bournemouth
Why do they still need their own dedicated airfield for a fleet of two Meteor's? Surely they could locate these at Farnborough, Boscombe Down or even Northolt which is just down the road from their main factory.

Joined: May 2017
Posts: 110
Likes: 146
From: Bournemouth
I worked for Flight Refuelling (now Cobham) in the 70s and 80s and in 1980 we relocated all our military test flying using Sea Vixen and Canberra aircraft from the legacy military Tarrant Rushton airfield to Bournemouth Airport....entirely a civilian airport. Why would MB be different?


Joined: Sep 2015
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 663
Likes: 398
From: London
I don't know exactly how they run their testing (or how frequently); assuming they test their seats above the airfield, wouldn't that cause one or two issues for all the other users?

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 390
Likes: 2
From: Closer than you think...
What with Homes England threatening the CPO it makes you wonder if the Government actually wants to support UK Businesses?
Oxford and the surrounding area already has enough new build rabbit hutch sized houses going up, don't need any more put them elsewhere! Out of interest, I wonder how much Homes England paid for the airfield or was it a simple transfer with incumbent tenant?
Finally, if I was MB the relocation package really would have to be a very, very good offer otherwise I could see some better offers coming in from more appreciative hosts who would dearly like to host the worlds leader in bang seat technology... Plenty of space in say Trumps back yard or Canada or....
Oxford and the surrounding area already has enough new build rabbit hutch sized houses going up, don't need any more put them elsewhere! Out of interest, I wonder how much Homes England paid for the airfield or was it a simple transfer with incumbent tenant?
Finally, if I was MB the relocation package really would have to be a very, very good offer otherwise I could see some better offers coming in from more appreciative hosts who would dearly like to host the worlds leader in bang seat technology... Plenty of space in say Trumps back yard or Canada or....


Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,137
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
The cynic in me wonders if this plan to possibly build on the place was put forward before MB put their hands up and admitted guilt over the Reds ejection. The cynic in me also wonders if it will be quietly dropped now.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 375
Likes: 6
From: with the wife

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 326
From: Royal Berkshire
As you say, maybe MB's 'refusal' to leave the site, is the trade off with HMG over the compulsory purchase order, and as you say, the housing plans will now get dropped...?
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London

Joined: May 2017
Posts: 110
Likes: 146
From: Bournemouth
As someone up-thread mentioned, why not relocate to RAF Benson only 3 miles away - assuming of course any testing MB currently do at Chalgrove does not interfere with normal airfield ops.
Interestingly Wiki says that Chalgrove Airfield is very secure and "surrounded by high fences". Am curious as to why this is - surely the testing of ejector seats is not hugely secret?
And again to quote someone up-thread, what actually happens at Chalgrove now if most of the actual testing takes place in Northern Ireland? Is it now just a base for the two Meteor's - in which case they could surely be based at Benson or Northolt?
Interestingly Wiki says that Chalgrove Airfield is very secure and "surrounded by high fences". Am curious as to why this is - surely the testing of ejector seats is not hugely secret?
And again to quote someone up-thread, what actually happens at Chalgrove now if most of the actual testing takes place in Northern Ireland? Is it now just a base for the two Meteor's - in which case they could surely be based at Benson or Northolt?

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 584
Likes: 34
From: Threshold 06
IMHO, Chalgrove is used for much more than the Meatboxes. All 0/0 and slow speed testing is done there on the airfield by a large seat test department. It has Cartridge production and extensive storage facilities on site. As for the F35 testing in France? It's probably because The weather there is much better for high altitude testing and the test area (Caseaux) is much bigger and restriction free.
However...There are a couple of 'new' alternate routes for the proposed Oxford to Cambridge Expressway which pass either side of the airfield. I suspect the OCC's little eyes light up when they think of a 5000 home development next to a new motorway
Ker Ching..
Just my personal opinion of course!
However...There are a couple of 'new' alternate routes for the proposed Oxford to Cambridge Expressway which pass either side of the airfield. I suspect the OCC's little eyes light up when they think of a 5000 home development next to a new motorway
Ker Ching..
Just my personal opinion of course!




