Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RCAF Hornet replacement.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RCAF Hornet replacement.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Mar 2022, 15:05
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,204
Received 401 Likes on 248 Posts
Originally Posted by golder
Even though we are updating our Shornets to block III. We don't want any more of them. At this stage, in 2030, we retire the Shornet and 2035, we retire the Growler. 2025 will decide if we get more F-35, to take us from 72 to100.
Thank you. With the F-15 getting a new lease on life (there's a "mature" aircraft, eh?) with the X version (that was related to the S version for the Saudis), I wasn't sure if a similar "SHornet revival" might be in progress.
I guess not.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 15:55
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,695
Received 345 Likes on 116 Posts
Originally Posted by GeeRam
Three....in theory.

Fort Worth, Italy and Japan.

I think though that the first complete production one off the Italian line wasn't that long ago (last year or late 2020?) and first one off the Japanese line might be this year or was late last year?
UK?

https://www.baesystems.com/en/feature/f35-production
Beamr is online now  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 15:59
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PLanet Earth
Posts: 1,329
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
Thank you. With the F-15 getting a new lease on life (there's a "mature" aircraft, eh?) with the X version (that was related to the S version for the Saudis), I wasn't sure if a similar "SHornet revival" might be in progress.
Doubt it.
I think the X has a mission (Large Missile Carrier for VLO Fighters) which only very few big air forces can afford. One such carrier is probably enough for those few air forces (USAF, IAF?) which can and will afford such a mix. In Europe, typically the EF will take over this role for those Air Forces which are big enough for a mixed fleet (RAF, Aeronatica Militare, In future to some extent GAF) and are having/getting the F-35.
henra is online now  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 16:04
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PLanet Earth
Posts: 1,329
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Buster Hyman
How many production lines of F-35's are there? Seems to be an awful lot of new customers...could take a while.
I don't know if Vlad' had bought huge amounts of LM stocks... !?
In any case he's due for a nice Christmas Gift by LM this Year and the 'best Salesman of the Year' award.
henra is online now  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 16:27
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Washington.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,077
Received 151 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by henra
I don't know if Vlad' had bought huge amounts of LM stocks... !?
In any case he's due for a nice Christmas Gift by LM this Year and the 'best Salesman of the Year' award.
I have a few suggestions. 😏
GlobalNav is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2023, 22:53
  #146 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,417
Received 1,593 Likes on 730 Posts
https://www.defensenews.com/air/2023...cf-18s-retire/

Canada strikes deal to buy F-35s from Lockheed, as CF-18s retire

WASHINGTON — Canada on Monday announced plans to buy 88 F-35A Joint Strike Fighters for CA$19 billion (U.S. $14 billion).

Defence Minister Anita Anand said in an online briefing the Royal Canadian Air Force would receive its first four Lockheed Martin-made F-35s in 2026, with the next six in 2027 and another six in 2028. The remainder would come in subsequent years.

The fifth-generation fighters will replace Canada’s current fleet of CF-18 Hornets, the Royal Canadian Air Force’s version of the F/A-18, Anand said. Canada expects the full F-35 fleet to be delivered in time for the service to phase the older fighters out by the end of 2032….

Canada will ensure its F-35s have drag chute capabilities to land on “short, icy, wet Arctic runways,” Anand said, and that its fighters have true north navigation capabilities, rather than magnetic north, to allow it to fly accurately deep into the Arctic.

Anand said Canada will build operational and training squadron facilities, including maintenance bays and simulator training, at two of its military bases: Bagotville in Quebec and Cold Lake in Alberta.

Anand also said Canada is investing in a series of infrastructure upgrades nationwide to better support North American Aerospace Defense Command and F-35 operations….
ORAC is online now  
Old 9th Jan 2023, 23:05
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
AAR?

If they're going to fly 'deep into the Arctic', presumably they'll need some AAR support?

So will the CC-150T be phased out early in favour of a new boom-equipped Canadian tanker? Or will the CF-35A fleet be fitted with probes?

Last edited by BEagle; 9th Jan 2023 at 23:22.
BEagle is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2023, 03:02
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 163
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by India Four Two
https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/2017239107693

The current government promised to scrap the F-35 program in 2015
Yes, India. In 2015 Trudeau stated that Canada would “never buy the F-35”. Clever lad that he is, he has made a significant contribution to physics by defining precisely how long in time “never” actually is. It would appear to be about 7.5 years.
Commander Taco is online now  
Old 10th Jan 2023, 04:18
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,582
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by BEagle
If they're going to fly 'deep into the Arctic', presumably they'll need some AAR support?
So will the CC-150T be phased out early in favour of a new boom-equipped Canadian tanker? Or will the CF-35A fleet be fitted with probes?
11 Aug 2022: Canada unveils planned deadline to buy four Airbus tanker aircraft (defensenews.com)
SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2023, 04:34
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
How hard has Canada been working it’s current tanker fleet that its already replacing them?

West Coast is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2023, 05:24
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,368
Received 548 Likes on 149 Posts
West Coast

It’s a boom or drogue tanker vs your F35 variant of choice issue. CF18s use drogue and Canada have ordered F35A which doesn’t.

BV
Bob Viking is online now  
Old 10th Jan 2023, 07:36
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
According to the reports, Canada expects its first CF-35A at least 2 years before its 4 x A330MRTT (contract yet to be placed) could be in service.
BEagle is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2023, 10:21
  #153 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,417
Received 1,593 Likes on 730 Posts
According to LM the fuselage space used by the probe in the B has been left vacant in the A so a probe can be installed if requested by a customer. What price they’d charge for an6 flight testing would doubtless be added to their bill.

I am sure the US would be happy to provide AAR to cover any capability gap until new tankers arrive if asked.
ORAC is online now  
Old 10th Jan 2023, 11:03
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,132
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
According to LM the fuselage space used by the probe in the B has been left vacant in the A so a probe can be installed if requested by a customer. What price they’d charge for an6 flight testing would doubtless be added to their bill.

I am sure the US would be happy to provide AAR to cover any capability gap until new tankers arrive if asked.
Given the ongoing KC-46 debacle, I'm really not sure how happy the USAF would be with covering Canada's AAR requirements.
Norway had the drag chute installed at its own expense, but doubtless an internal AAR probe would be more complex/expensive and not worth the investment given the new MRTTs aren't that far off.
Omega Air has a boom-equipped KDC-10, so perhaps that might be an option.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2023, 20:25
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
It’s a boom or drogue tanker vs your F35 variant of choice issue. CF18s use drogue and Canada have ordered F35A which doesn’t.

BV
Thanks BV, that explains away ditching the relatively youthful airframes, especially when compared to their KC135 cousins.
West Coast is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2023, 22:09
  #156 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,417
Received 1,593 Likes on 730 Posts
I’d point out the CF-35 in the original proposed contract had both chute and probe. Canada has ended up without either at, presumably, a higher price.

On the other hand, as early models can’t be upgraded to Block 4 standard, they may actually have ended up with a better deal….

Last edited by ORAC; 11th Jan 2023 at 10:28. Reason: Typo
ORAC is online now  
Old 11th Jan 2023, 09:39
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,709
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by West Coast
How hard has Canada been working it’s current tanker fleet that its already replacing them?
Although only been used as tankers for about 14 years, they've been in RCAF service since 1992 as transports, and were second hand then (Delivered mid 80s IIRC) so they are not youthful airframes
Davef68 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2023, 06:23
  #158 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,417
Received 1,593 Likes on 730 Posts
https://aviationweek.com/defense-spa...-fighter-needs

Australia Starts Looking Beyond The F-35 For Next-Gen Fighter Needs

Australia has started looking for options beyond the Lockheed Martin F-35A for its future fighter fleet, as interest in the next generation of air combat technology increasingly encroaches on funding available for existing aircraft.

The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) currently operates four fighter squadrons, with three already flying F-35As and the fourth composed of Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornets. The last in that list had been expected to be replaced by a fourth squadron of F-35As to be ordered and delivered by the end of the decade, but that plan is no longer guaranteed.

“What the fourth squadron of F-35s has become is the Super Hornet replacement, not just [a plan to buy] the fourth squadron of F-35s,” RAAF Air Marshal Robert Chipman told Aviation Week at the Global Air and Space Chiefs’ Conference in London July 12-13.

Instead, the RAAF plans to upgrade and extend the service life of the Super Hornet squadron before replacing those aircraft in the mid-2030s. The new replacement schedule means the RAAF will have more options than only F-35As, including a new generation of uncrewed collaborative combat aircraft (CCA) and crewed fighters scheduled to be fielded in the mid-2030s by the U.S. and a UK/Italy/Japan consortium.

“We will look at the F-35, and we’re very, very comfortable and very happy with the capability of the F-35,” Chipman said. “But it would be remiss of me not to look at what else is available for us to replace our Super Hornets in the future.”

The options include the U.S. Next-Generation Air Dominance program and the Global Combat Air Program (GCAP), which in 2022 merged the UK-led BAE Systems Tempest and Japan’s Mitsubishi F-X projects into a common aircraft system. The French/German/Spanish Future Combat Air System program plans to field a crewed fighter in 2040, which is possibly beyond Australia’s ideal time frame.

Through the tripartite AUKUS security pact, Australia is already partnered with the U.S. and UK to receive nuclear-powered submarines and collaborate on certain advanced technologies, such as hypersonic propulsion, autonomy, quantum technologies, cybertools and electronic warfare.

GCAP officials also view the AUKUS pact as a potential path for sharing next-generation combat aircraft technology from the UK to Australia, Richard Berthon, the UK Defense Ministry's director of Future Combat Air, said in addressing the same conference.

“I think there’s an interesting future in which you can see combat air and GCAP developing,” Berthon said. “I think AUKUS is a fantastic foundation, obviously focused in a different domain to what we are focused on today, but the nations are considering opportunities for broadening the partnership.”…..
ORAC is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.