Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-35 Royal Air Force Marham

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-35 Royal Air Force Marham

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Oct 2017, 12:37
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Here and there
Age: 41
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Exactly - what could have changed in the intervening 40 years?! Definitely no pool here, as otherwise we wouldn’t do pool drills in King’s Lynn...
frodo_monkey is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2017, 13:27
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: South Skerry
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Definitions, folks...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asphalt_concrete

Decent runway concrete ought to withstand a short landing. The exhaust impinges at an oblique angle and the peak impact point is moving at whatever the landing speed is. RVLs will be tougher - maybe on good concrete but fuggetaboutit on your typical 3000 foot strip or road in Filthistan. VLs? AM-2 and lots of it, or pizza-oven concrete.
George K Lee is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2017, 14:05
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
Search for posts with Asphalt concrete or even pizza-oven but why?
SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2017, 14:22
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,815
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by KelvinD
Asphalt? That could be a bad move. I remember at Fairford 2016, they had to lay a temporary steel mesh strip to allow the F-35 to manage a vertical landing. The explanation given was that the asphalt would melt!
We had to patch a few bits of runway due to the efforts of the Yak 141 a Farnborough in '92 during practice/validations; this was after he had specifically been asked NOT to use the ashpalt but operate from the concrete at the end.
A few years earlier, even a Mig 29 had melted a patch of taxiway surface after it was held there due to its efflux pointing slightly downwards.

Last edited by chevvron; 6th Oct 2017 at 14:35.
chevvron is online now  
Old 6th Oct 2017, 15:55
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: over the rainbow
Age: 75
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by frodo_monkey
Exactly - what could have changed in the intervening 40 years?! Definitely no pool here, as otherwise we wouldn’t do pool drills in King’s Lynn...
Indeed this from the Station newsletter ...


Overall an amazing achievement for a base without its own swimming pool and very limited access to swimming facilities in the local area. RAF Marham has never finished so high, with the Ladies retaining the swimming trophy yet again. The standard of competition across all three disciplines was extremely high from all stations (most with RAF Swimmers), and it is a true testament to everyone’s hard work over the last few months, determination to succeed, and willingness to drive a 40 minute return journey to train throughout the week.

---

Even my kids school had a decent swimming pool. I do not know what the Royal Air Force has come to if it can no longer provide such basic recreational facilities.
roving is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2017, 23:53
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
"It was there in '77!"
Made me laugh. PPRuNe in one sentence
Well always happy to give you a laugh

But there is a more serious point. Building and housing a swimming pool is an expensive undertaking, so the shortsighted decision to close and demolish it (whenever that happened in the intervening years) is sad and disappointing, particularly when you read that item from the newsletter quoted by roving.

I'm glad my service coincided with a time when the RAF wasn't on the bones of its arse, and when personnel and their families from a major operational station didn't have to travel 15 miles to do liferaft drills, or just have a swim. Pathetic!
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2017, 06:12
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 204
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Given the fact that the F35 Sqns will spend a lot/ some time afloat, and the alleged inability of the rest of the RN to be able to properly protect the QE, not to mention torpedoing Devonport Dockyard and hitting large underwater landmasses ,learning to swim or keeping in practice may be a good idea. 😀
PapaDolmio is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.