Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Canberra still leading the way for NASA's eclipse chase

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Canberra still leading the way for NASA's eclipse chase

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jul 2017, 18:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Canberra still leading the way for NASA's eclipse chase

Not bad for an aircraft that originated from a WWII requirement 73 years ago.

VIDEO: NASA Will Chase Upcoming Total Solar Eclipse Shadow In Retrofitted WB-57F Jets |
Two's in is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2017, 19:42
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Two's in
Not bad for an aircraft that originated from a WWII requirement 73 years ago.

VIDEO: NASA Will Chase Upcoming Total Solar Eclipse Shadow In Retrofitted WB-57F Jets |
I often wonder whether partly reason that it's high altitude efficiency has not been surpassed by more modern airframes is that in a more modern era such an airframe would be considered too dangerous and difficult to handle at take-off and approach/landing phases. I did start a thread a few years ago about "flying the Canberra" as it looks like a really difficult bird during some phases of flight. I suspect it is a delight at hight altitude though.
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2017, 21:03
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 379
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trim Stab
I often wonder whether partly reason that it's high altitude efficiency has not been surpassed by more modern airframes is that in a more modern era such an airframe would be considered too dangerous and difficult to handle at take-off and approach/landing phases. I did start a thread a few years ago about "flying the Canberra" as it looks like a really difficult bird during some phases of flight. I suspect it is a delight at hight altitude though.
I don't know, but I suspect that in this modern age of digital flight controls any kind of difficulty can be ironed out, at least to some extent. I suspect that quite a lot of today's whizzy fast jets can get that high, though perhaps not for very long.

I suppose the attraction of the Canberra is that modifications (like bolting on a telescope) are comparatively easy and it can also fly high up for a long time. Still a fairly unique combination of attributes.
msbbarratt is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2017, 13:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Canberra was nice to fly, although assymetric it could catch the unwary or cavalier
Wander00 is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2017, 16:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 75' from the runway edge and 150' from the threshold
Age: 74
Posts: 247
Received 30 Likes on 12 Posts
Canberra Asymmetric

In 1969 I was a shiny new LAC AATC at Wattisham. During one evening shift I went out to the runway caravan to learn about the runway controllers job. At about 18:30 a Canberra (BI8 IIRC) was conducting a practice asymmetric approach on PAR. At about a mile the aeroplane seemed, to my then inexperienced eyes, to shudder and suddenly the left wing dropped and the aircraft completed about 270˚ before impacting the ground left wing tip and nose first. Both crew died. This was the 23rd fatal Canberra practice asymmetric and I still get the occasional flashback of this and was quite a sobering introduction to the dangers of military flying. I think I'm right in that there never was a fatal real asymmetric Canberra accident.

A342
ACW342 is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2017, 20:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Near where the Wokkas live.
Age: 79
Posts: 112
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I'm right in that there never was a fatal real asymmetric Canberra accident.

I know of at least two - 3 Sqdn B(I)8 at Akrotiri December 1970 (crew and 1 passenger killed)and 98 Sqdn E15 at Cottesmore during 1971 (crew ejected safely).

Your comment may be true for the Meteor which suffered a similar problem.

Polecat
polecat2 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2017, 03:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: All Bar One
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I'm right in that there never was a fatal real asymmetric Canberra accident.

100 Sqn banner towing sortie, Akrotiri, Nov 80 (?). We lost Paddy and mark that day. Pretty sure it was an engine failure on take off.
spectre150 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2017, 10:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
The Canberra had its formal origins in a 1944 requirement issued by the Air Ministry for a successor to the de Havilland Mosquito. This requirement, the initial revision being E.3/45, sought a high altitude, high-speed bomber which was to be equipped with no defensive armament.
Gosh, to think we're the same age ... although I haven't been modified or developed quite as much.
MPN11 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2017, 11:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Westnoreastsouth
Posts: 1,827
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by spectre150

100 Sqn banner towing sortie, Akrotiri, Nov 80 (?). We lost Paddy and mark that day. Pretty sure it was an engine failure on take off.
Yes - that was tragic - I believe Paddy was near to retirement

From the ASN website...


Owner/operator: 100 Sqn RAF
Registration: WH667
C/n / msn: 71144
Fatalities: Fatalities: 2 / Occupants: 2
Other fatalities: 0
Airplane damage: Written off (damaged beyond repair)
Location: Akrotiri - Cyprus
Phase: Take off
Nature: Military
Departure airport: Akrotiri, Cyprus
Destination airport:
Narrative:
Written off 7.11.1980: Engine blew up on take-off from RAF Akortiri, Cuprus, aircraft rolled, hit ground and was destroyed by fire. Both crew killed

Crew:
Pilot: Sqn/Ldr George William "Paddy" Thompson RAF killed
Nav: F/O Mark Wray RAF ejected but killed
longer ron is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2017, 11:40
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: humzaland
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear me, Canberra asymmetric again! Someone will correct me but I can't recall an accident to a Canberra (Mk 2 to 8 anyway) caused directly by a real EFATO, even though there was sometimes a very big gap between rotate and crit speed let alone safety speed - the accidents happened on the subsequent approach. Once the flaps were down it needed a lot of power on a single engine to make a significant change to the RoD, and at one time Bassingbourn was certainly teaching flap down at the top of the G/P, when it was far better to make a flapless approach and lower the flap very late. It's all a long time ago.

Sadly I have been corrected. And I knew Paddy.

Last edited by binbrook; 30th Jul 2017 at 11:51. Reason: Overtaken by a later post
binbrook is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2017, 11:44
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Two's in
Not bad for an aircraft that originated from a WWII requirement 73 years ago.

VIDEO: NASA Will Chase Upcoming Total Solar Eclipse Shadow In Retrofitted WB-57F Jets |
Not much in common with the original EE Canberra though.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2017, 13:26
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ISTR (long time ago) lower flap not above 600' and when sure to get in




orwas that the icing let-down?

Last edited by Wander00; 31st Jul 2017 at 13:28. Reason: I cannot remeber what I had forbreakfast...
Wander00 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2017, 14:51
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Newark'ish
Posts: 108
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by polecat2
I think I'm right in that there never was a fatal real asymmetric Canberra accident.

I know of at least two - 3 Sqdn B(I)8 at Akrotiri December 1970 (crew and 1 passenger killed)and 98 Sqdn E15 at Cottesmore during 1971 (crew ejected safely).

Your comment may be true for the Meteor which suffered a similar problem.

Polecat
I watched the Akrotiri crash and knew the guy who went up for a jolly.......often get flashbacks.
mikemmb is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2017, 19:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Deepest darkest London
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ACW342

The incident you sadly witnessed was likely the 85 Sqn B.2 which crashed at Wattisham on 27th July 1970.

V1
Valiantone is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.