Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

C130J centre wing box replacement confirmed

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

C130J centre wing box replacement confirmed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jul 2017, 10:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 327
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C130J centre wing box replacement confirmed

Amid the prevalent gloom it's good to see a positive if unglamorous development (often the best sort and easily overlooked) - a £110m contract has been placed with Marshalls to replace the centre wing boxes of the RAF's 14 retained C130Js. All of these aircraft had been due to go under the 2010 SDSR until a slightly more sane SDSR 2015 signalled retention of the 14. The new boxes apparently have two to three times the life of the originals and the OSD is now 2035.
Frostchamber is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2017, 11:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,375
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
Are they becoming the aeronautical equivalent to Trigger's broom?
Lyneham Lad is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2017, 19:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pembrokeshire
Posts: 124
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Replacing wing boxes is absolutely routine (albeit, a big job)......and good husbandry.

You wouldn't want one of ours doing something similar to that in the fire water tanker incident/accident would you......?!
bunta130 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2017, 20:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Uranus
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Tanker

With regards to that particular accident was it just fatigue from the low level environment it was operated in?
Shaft109 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2017, 22:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pembrokeshire
Posts: 124
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Not quite:

https://aviation-safety.net/database...?id=20020617-0

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/NTSB_...ary_for_N130HP

Poor souls - doesn't matter how skilled you are as an aviator if the wings come off
bunta130 is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2017, 07:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: sussex
Posts: 1,841
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
We have been here before with the C130K.
ancientaviator62 is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2017, 08:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: wales
Posts: 462
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Remember its a design that pre dates the Blackburn Beverley , design philosophy has changed a lot since then !
bvcu is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2017, 09:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South East of Penge
Age: 74
Posts: 1,792
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Remember its a design that pre dates the Blackburn Beverley
Really? do tell us more.
Haraka is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2017, 09:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,709
Received 38 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by bvcu
Remember its a design that pre dates the Blackburn Beverley , design philosophy has changed a lot since then !
Not quite, but only 4 years younger in terms of first flight
Davef68 is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2017, 10:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: England
Posts: 661
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
The fact that the MOD is spending money updating something is no guarantee that it will remain in service for any significant length of time.
keith williams is online now  
Old 24th Jul 2017, 11:06
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Davef68
Not quite, but only 4 years younger in terms of first flight
Interesting to note that the Beverley entered RAF service March '56, the C-130 entered service with the USAF December that same year.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2017, 11:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,283
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
Beverley
what a machine....carried a 'tank' to the threshold of the departure airfield or a load of ping pong balls halfway around the world!
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2017, 11:37
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 327
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by keith williams
The fact that the MOD is spending money updating something is no guarantee that it will remain in service for any significant length of time.
True enough I guess. And this is pprune, where there are very few silver linings, and those that do exist will always have a cloud . But perhaps rashly I depart from that zeitgeist by recognising that credibility in complaining about genuine concerns (and lord knows there are plenty of those) is helped by a preparedness to balance that by giving credit where it's due - as in this instance.
Frostchamber is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2017, 19:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 28 Posts
With my nerd hat on:

The GAL 60 Universal first flew on 20 Jun 50 and after issues with ground handling was redesigned into the GAL 65 Universal, this second prototype flying on 14 Jun 53. The Air Ministry were impressed enough by the design improvements to order an initial batch of 20 aircraft in late 52 before the new aircraft had flown. The first production Beverley flew on 29 Jan 55.

The USAF issued the requirement for a new purpose built cargo aircraft in Feb 51. The Lockheed design submission used a similar planform and cargo hold configuration to the Chase XCG-20 Avitruc which had been designed & flown as a glider in 1947 & later developed into the C123 Provider. The prototype YC130 was first flown on 23 Aug 54.

So while the Beverley has the edge in precedence terms they are both designs from a very similar age.

Only one of them is still being produced today albeit in modified form.
Ken Scott is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2017, 11:20
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: No idea - what does the GPS say?
Age: 64
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TBM-Legend
what a machine....carried a 'tank' to the threshold of the departure airfield or a load of ping pong balls halfway around the world!
Apologies for the thread creep.....
As a kid I recall my father showing me a home cine movie he shot coming back from (IIRC) Sardinia to Thorney Island in the Beverley. The film was taken at low level and showed a French steam train overtaking the aircraft. He did say they had a pretty strong headwind on the day.
MoateAir is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.