Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

What could fly AT FL660?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

What could fly AT FL660?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jun 2017, 13:59
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East Sussex
Age: 86
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An SR71 could do it (and much more)
pontifex is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2017, 22:58
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: uk
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sidestick_n_Rudder
There I was fat dumb and happy, flying across southern Japan at FL 400, when I saw a contrail waay above us. Then I heard someone (with an American accent) asking for a block of airspace between FL600 and FL660. What could possibly fly that high? The only plane I can think of is a U2. Do these fly yet? What else could that be?
Concorde, with a glass of fizz of course.
kaitakbowler is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2017, 01:46
  #23 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,094
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back about 12 years ago, I often watched traffic routing northbound over the London area indicating FL660 on mode C; always assumed they were TR1s/U2s bound for Mildenhall
FL660 over North London for Mildenhall would have made for an interesting descent profile? Or do they go more or less overhead and then descend like a brick, with no cabin to worry about?
parabellum is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2017, 11:42
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.rt.com/news/386875-global-hawk-drone-japan/
Chris Kebab is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2017, 12:08
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,820
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by parabellum
FL660 over North London for Mildenhall would have made for an interesting descent profile? Or do they go more or less overhead and then descend like a brick, with no cabin to worry about?
Yes I wondered about that, but someone told me they go over the North Sea to descend; anyhow they were heading in the general direction of Mildenhall.
chevvron is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2017, 12:45
  #26 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,439
Received 1,600 Likes on 734 Posts
Get clear of the MRSA and do a "falling leaf" descending spiral, ideally in a pre-booked danger area near their destination. e.g. East Anglian Military Training Area MTA B.

http://www.mantma.co.uk/pdf/eg_enr_6_5_1_1_en.pdf
ORAC is online now  
Old 4th Jun 2017, 19:33
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reminds me of a story I once heard about an ASCOT callsign on a pond crossing hearing an unknown
callsign asking Shannon Oceanic if FL600 was available. The controller replied (somewhat sarcastically) 'yes of course sir, if you can make it, it's all yours', to which the reply came "Roger this is xxxx leaving FL650 for FL600". Reckon it was an aurora?
NavyNav2 is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2017, 20:59
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Civ/HAL/SHY/FYY/PWK/AAS/WAD/AVI/GPT/BZN/BSN/WAD/BAS/FLK/WIT/MND/WAD/WIT/WAD/Civ
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This used to bug me in my area radar days in UK
"Request service above FL600" = RADAR Control (back in the day) = avoidance of EVERY non-sqkr!

If they said:
"Request service above FL660" = FIS (back in the day) = forget about them, once identified and Sqking NMC
unclenelli is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2017, 10:08
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,820
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by NavyNav2
Reminds me of a story I once heard about an ASCOT callsign on a pond crossing hearing an unknown
callsign asking Shannon Oceanic if FL600 was available. The controller replied (somewhat sarcastically) 'yes of course sir, if you can make it, it's all yours', to which the reply came "Roger this is xxxx leaving FL650 for FL600". Reckon it was an aurora?
Sorry but 'Sandy Parts' already did thet one at #8.
chevvron is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2017, 14:50
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pastures new
Posts: 354
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Tankertrashnav
From wiki



As an aside, I Googled 'U2' and just got page after page about some bloody Irish pop group
Ah, the mighty Bono jet
kintyred is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2017, 18:40
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Sky
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some are confusing how the RQ-4 flies with the MQ-9. Global Hawk isn't "flown" by a pilot, it follows a set of instructions about what it needs to do - there's no regular flight controls. Also unlike the Predators all of it's flight crew are in the same region whereas the Preds/Reapers have both a local and a remote flight crew.
YellowTom is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2017, 19:02
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire, California, Geneva, and Paris
Age: 67
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recall the Oceanic Clearance for both British Airways and Air France Concorde fleets across the Atlantic was to cruise climb from Flight Level 440 up to Flight Level 660.

Not bad for a fifty year old commercial airliner and none of this rolling up and down military aerobatic nonsense either!
DC10RealMan is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2017, 21:49
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 497
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by DC10RealMan
I recall the Oceanic Clearance for both British Airways and Air France Concorde fleets across the Atlantic was to cruise climb from Flight Level 440 up to Flight Level 660.
A cruise-climb to FL590 or maybe FL600 is the maximum I ever heard in several years of hearing them send position reports on HF.
Liffy 1M is online now  
Old 7th Jun 2017, 08:10
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire, California, Geneva, and Paris
Age: 67
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The clearance was up to FL660 but the Concorde's never flew above FL600 in case of depressurization "issues"
DC10RealMan is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2017, 18:47
  #35 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,439
Received 1,600 Likes on 734 Posts
The clearance was up to FL660 but the Concorde's never flew above FL600 in case of depressurization "issues"
I was at 280SU in Cyprus when the Lebanese civil war kicked off in the mid-1970s, at the time Concorde flew south of Cyprus out to Bahrain.

The day came after the war started that Concorde entered the Nicosia FIR enroute and announced, as normal, Concorde xxx at xxx, Fl560, expecting xxx at time xxx".

"Roger", replied Nicosia, "Beirut FIR is closed, descend to FL370, set stepped xxx knots and route xxx, xxx, xxx" (left turn just before Lebanon, north, then right turn and subsonic transit over Syria).

"Wait", says Concorde, and presumably has a conflab in cockpit about fuel etc. Two minutes later a cut glass British accent comes back on the air. "Nicosia, Concorde xxx. Be advised, Beirut airspace closure does not affect Concorde operations. I have my destination in sight. Climbing FL620 and and going VFR above, good day" - and duly climbed above the then Nicosia, Beirut and Saudi FIRs and flew a direct line to his destination - at least till he left our radar and RT cover.
ORAC is online now  
Old 7th Jun 2017, 19:01
  #36 (permalink)  
wub
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,216
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
I too was at 280 at that time and well remember seeing Concorde leaping across the 'font' for the first time on its way to Bahrain.
wub is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.