Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

FLYING THE AWACS - SKY POINTERS

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

FLYING THE AWACS - SKY POINTERS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Mar 2017, 19:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 160
Received 94 Likes on 49 Posts
FLYING THE AWACS - SKY POINTERS

At the risk of ' telling grannies to suck eggs ' and before alzheimer's finally kicks in may I pass on some 'top tips ' which helped me fly the AWACs - which in my opinion could be a right bitch !

1. SKY POINTERS - can't remember anyone preferring the American style Sky Pointer over our the RAF intuitive ground pointer. Could be quite disorienting if recovering from a UP at night?

TT. Imagine you are wearing an old style Prussian Helmet - with a pointy top!
Turning right point goes right - intuitive to straighten up ?

2. APPROACH- plan ahead and fly by pre-planned 'rote '. Last minute seat of the pants adjustments usually worked out badly - even when experienced/ overconfident!
TRIM is vital - time the EXACT trim required for each flap setting and apply early -Check in trim with loose grip. 50 ft - 1 sec of back trim 20 ft start round out?

3. Cross wind landings - difficult particularly with low slung CFM 56 engines.

TT - GENTLY push off the drift - don't kick it off - overemphasise the into wind aileron.Practise in the sim.

4.AAR - difficult at first particularly for ex fast jet jocks.

TT Never rush it !
TRIM TRIM TRIM - including ailerons.
Line up the throttles very carefully - with cable stretch could be well out
of line.
Position seat carefully - EXACTLY the same each time.
MOMENTUM is huge - don't forget to take off half the original input -
BEFORE it is too late!
Relax and keep breathing.

5. The FLIGHT SIMULATOR- even the newer model can be very slippery and make a fool out of even the best - however use it at every opportunity to practice the basics - even displays and AAR. I can't remember anyone who flew the sim well who wasn't even better on the aircraft!


Good luck - and apologies to any current QFIs who might take offence?
mahogany bob is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 06:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,567
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
It was easy to fly! Go where you are told - keep within AOB and stick to groundspeed!
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 08:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: home for good
Posts: 494
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd hope there is a large volume of useful tips shared among the many 'dish drivers/ saucer steerers' of the world's Air Forces?
Would certainly expect the STT (Sqn training teams) to be collating FS and general 'user-guides' from all over (good excuse for a jolly to warmer parts... )
Sandy Parts is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 09:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 607
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Why stick with the aircraft document set (15A2) and SOPs when you can fly using internet gained top tips and French/Saudi/NATO/US gossip?
VP. If the doc set and SOPs are fully up to scratch (as they should be), then I agree with your gentle sarcasm. However, all too often they're not and people who should know better just hide behind them. The most important skill I was ever taught in the RAF was Airmanship. Knowing 'when to' and then 'when not to' use the 'doc set & SOPs'. Today's youngsters unfortunately only know one way.
H Peacock is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 11:04
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: home for good
Posts: 494
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
suspect you have to find a free Dii terminal to read the 'doc set' and 'SOPs' these days? While the OCU was prepping for the MRA4, they had to fight to get printed docs (sadly they lasted longer than the airframes..). I'm guessing that fight would be near impossible today?
Sandy Parts is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 20:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was easy to fly!
Easy to 'navigate' too, but by ***k was it boring. Only ever enjoyed Westbound 'deployments'.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 20:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great thread, PPRuNe at its best. Why stick with the aircraft document set (15A2) and SOPs when you can fly using internet gained top tips and French/Saudi/NATO/US gossip?
Well, the official stuff was largely ballocks, as I found out whilst teaching the stuff on the OCU.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2017, 05:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Always been curious MB, was there any effect on handling from that big
dish ?


How about drag, much of a difference from the standard B707 airframe ?
stilton is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2017, 06:13
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Here
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't use aileron trim when behind a tanker.

Last edited by fingureof8; 1st Apr 2017 at 06:36.
fingureof8 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2017, 07:19
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 160
Received 94 Likes on 49 Posts
Stilton

Re dome drag - at GK we sometimes trained on the ex Sabina Airline B 707
- the only difference that I can remember was that the basic 707 was more 'slippery' and needed less power ( about 3% ?) - the rotodome did add drag but not as much as its size ( 6 ft tall ) and weight would suggest as the dome created its own lift - amazing design!

Figureof8

Re aileron trim - you are probably right?? - but I remember on 1 rare occasion the only way to fly straight behind the tanker was to apply some aileron trim!
Perhaps we were doing it wrong?

Vigilant Pilot I can't remember any of these 'top tips ' in any of the tech manuals - which I found very sleep inducing!
mahogany bob is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2017, 08:48
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Here
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All done with the rudder trim, but feet on the floor and the FE nagging about N1 alignment..

Aileron trim is there to look pretty. 😂
fingureof8 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2017, 16:47
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 160
Received 94 Likes on 49 Posts
Figureof8

Maybe we had a fuel imbalance which caused the ac to roll slightly requiring aileron trim to correct?
mahogany bob is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2017, 19:42
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bomber County
Age: 73
Posts: 249
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Willard Whyte
Easy to 'navigate' too, but by ***k was it boring. Only ever enjoyed Westbound 'deployments'.


I spent my last 5 years as a civvie at Waddo as Trials Scientific Officer with the E3. Some of our 10 hour sorties comprised nothing but 15nm circles.


I can recall the joy of the Nav when I told him that the next sortie would involve continuous changes of heading ( +10deg, -20deg, + 30deg, -40 deg etc. ) He was fair chuffed to find that he had something technical to do!!


Radar101
radar101 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2017, 20:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,567
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Some of our 10 hour sorties comprised nothing but 15nm circles.

To be fair - most of my 7,000 hrs in the aircraft was also spent flying in 15nm circles.....
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2017, 05:08
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 706
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is it true that the phrase "Retrograde" is used to describe an operational AWACS sortie that is prematurely aborted due to enemy activity ?
Fonsini is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2017, 06:21
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,567
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
No. Further comment of the meanings of code words and procedure will not be made!
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2017, 07:31
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,827
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Watching the E-3D jousting the VC10K centreline hose (on the CCTV) looked weird enough, but the AEW3 Nimrod looked ridiculous. It had to do a climbing approach and on the CCTV when in contact it looked like a platypus.

Probably flew like one too!
BEagle is online now  
Old 2nd Apr 2017, 08:00
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,058
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
Dutch Roll ?

What did/do they teach or preach about dutch roll and yaw damper (or whatever it’s called now) including related failures, for the 707 AWACs series ?

Question applies equally to in-flight demonstration or training, simulator, classroom, and whatever manuals or scuttlebutt that might be available.

Same question also asked for RAF Rivet Joint.

LFH
Lordflasheart is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2017, 08:21
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 607
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
RAF Rivet Joint.
Probably been said before, but what a truly ridiculous name for an RAF aircraft! Why on earth didn't we give it a different name; anything would be better! Is it too late to do a competition??
H Peacock is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2017, 08:42
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,567
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Watching the E-3D jousting the VC10K centreline hose (on the CCTV) looked weird enough, but the AEW3 Nimrod looked ridiculous. It had to do a climbing approach and on the CCTV when in contact it looked like a platypus.

Probably flew like one too!

Actually, consensus was that the AEW3 flew better than the MR2 - the nose and tail additions gave better yaw characteristics and Dutch roll was significantly reduced. Just a shame that the Mission System Avionics were pants.


As for Sentry - the flight deck crews said that the problem during tanking was when you got a little high behind the tanker and you placed the rotodome into the tanker's turbulence.
Wensleydale is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.