Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Top heavy military

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Top heavy military

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Nov 2016, 13:15
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
Jersey's Chief Civil Servant gets over £200k ... for an Island with 100k population
MPN11 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2016, 07:35
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Too many ranks is the problem
Parson is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2016, 08:17
  #23 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Parson, in addition to my early comment that many ranks are set against international rank structures. One example was our down ranking of DVD from 5* to 4* as US Forces only appoint a 5* in wartime.

What rank would you abolish? IMHO Colonel, Air Cdre and Cdre might be considered redundant. And 2* and 3* might be merged?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2016, 08:51
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Annual Compendium of RAF Manpower Statistics 2016 released by the Government Statistical Service:

RAF Trained Regular Officers

Wg Cdr
Liability 920
Strength 980
Surplus 60 (7%)

Gp Capt
Liability 210
Strength 300
Surplus 90 (42%)

Air Cdre & Above
Liability 70
Strength 110
Surplus 40 (64%)

That's 190 more Senior Officers more that the RAF needs whilst the majority of the remaining manpower is in deficit.
Mos Eisely is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2016, 10:43
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 36
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Did you mean Brigadier, Air Cdre and Cdre?
Underbolt is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2016, 11:23
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Too many ranks is the problem
OK, I'm intrigued - why is that?
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2016, 12:32
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Historic - we have a rank structure that goes back to WW2 when the RAF was much much bigger - and had fewer SO's as well
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2016, 17:25
  #28 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Underbolt, no I didn't.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2016, 17:27
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
Interesting numbers, Mos Eisely ... and welcome aboard!

I wonder what all those 'surplus' officers do to pass the time?
MPN11 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2016, 17:40
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Between a rock and a hard place.
Age: 52
Posts: 125
Received 15 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by MPN11
Interesting numbers, Mos Eisely ... and welcome aboard!

I wonder what all those 'surplus' officers do to pass the time?
Make up compulsory objectives for OJARS and SJARS?
4everAD is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2016, 20:44
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
PN, Roland

Taking the air force as an example and looking at, say, the reduction in manpower since 1990, it is hard to justify having the same number of commissioned ranks. And as H Harry says, if you go back to WW2, when the rank structure was the same as today, it is even harder to justify. I'd say an air rank and Gp Capt could go.
Parson is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2016, 21:14
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've just been watching C4 news and I'm sure I saw that the average CEO or CM gets the equivalent of the total sum of 43 of his company employees salary.
So even in the worst possible scenario I don't think our Admirals cop that much.

Britain has problems but its wrong for the press or others to suddenly blame our Admirals as some sort of out of touch overpaid elite.
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2016, 21:15
  #33 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The heads of the RAAF and RCAF are 3*, RNZAF and RNoAF are 2*

DSACEUR and DSACLANT are both British 3*

So your point is valid in that smaller air forces have lower ranked heads but for international comparison, as Britain holds high level international posts it needs more stars.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2016, 21:28
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its all just another sign of discontent with an elite, and this will continue for a long while yet. People are trying to drag the military (in this case the Navy) into it. Or conversely its an agitator suddenly trying to place the Naval High Command alongside a very highly paid corporate elite to covey some sort of brotherhood, who knows in this era of false news and the rest of it?
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2016, 07:52
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 63
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Do we really need an Admiral for every ship? That ratio doesn't look quite right. Also, do we really have more Wing Commanders than combat aircraft?
DaveUnwin is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2016, 08:06
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,792
Received 78 Likes on 35 Posts
do we really have more Wing Commanders than combat aircraft?
< select one role among the many undertaken by the RAF >
< select a rank with more individuals than there are aircraft in aforementioned role >
< confect outrage >

Do we really have more air marshals than wide area land surveillance platforms?
Easy Street is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2016, 09:11
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does the RAF really have 190 surplus senior officers!
Mos Eisely is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2016, 09:32
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Personally I am outraged at the fact we have several thousand Able Seaman - there must be hundreds for every ship.
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2016, 13:54
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 530
Received 174 Likes on 93 Posts
Now look, you're going to get in trouble with the equality and diversity police. Surely the use of the term "able" is discriminatory - as is the use of the term seaman.

Obviously a new rank of "neutrally abled sea (or land) person" is required.
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2016, 16:33
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
averagely abled seaperson??
Wander00 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.