Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

The new Royal yacht

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

The new Royal yacht

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Nov 2016, 22:07
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Poor old hangarshuffle. Overfill with bile today, did we?

It must be such a burden to have to live in such a dreadful place as Britain.

Couldn't you find somewhere better and more fair, more societally balanced, like Cuba, or Belarus, or N Korea?
Do try, please!
noflynomore is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2016, 22:49
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Posts: 1,185
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm sure the Wave Knight is capable of throwing a decent cocktail party.. Just rig an awning over the Helipad, some tables and chairs and a bar! Shiver my timbers, it's not that difficult!

If the Royal Family want a new Royal Yacht; I'm sure they could afford one! I'll even contribute to a fund if necessary. As long as I get an invite!
Out Of Trim is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2016, 15:13
  #23 (permalink)  
ImageGear
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Perhaps a Charter could be arranged with Sir Philip Green?
I would rather his bucket be confiscated and sold off to fund some of the pensions of the employees who have had their retirement prospects wiped out.

Alternatively, a local port is well endowed with eastern and middle eastern floating pleasure palaces. Anyone of which would make a very grand Royal Yacht and if the right one was appropriated and the cultural bling gutted out of it, it might have the de rigeur DAS and "ancillary" equipment.

Imagegear
 
Old 16th Nov 2016, 15:55
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,035
Received 2,903 Likes on 1,244 Posts
I would rather his bucket be confiscated and sold off to fund some of the pensions of the employees who have had their retirement prospects wiped out.
Agreed, it should be illegal for any company to be able to access the pension fund, period.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2016, 16:16
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mordor
Posts: 1,315
Received 54 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Agreed, it should be illegal for any company to be able to access the pension fund, period.

Erm...it is.

PDR
PDR1 is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2016, 16:34
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South of the M4
Posts: 1,640
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
BEagle
Anyone who disagrees should be incarcerated in the Tower at HM's pleasure.
OK - I bags Anne Boleyn's cell, but please make sure the axe is sharp!
WT
Warmtoast is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2016, 16:41
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,203
Received 117 Likes on 53 Posts
Nutloose said

it has a helipad
Indeed it does, but the thread you started has fook all to do with mil aviation and is yet another example of the pointless triv that largely fills this forum and makes it less and less relevant to the few serving members left!

I now await the witty "don't like it, don't read it posts"...
downsizer is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2016, 17:55
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,058
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
mil aviation relevance ?

Mil aviation relevance ?

As well as bing a cushy ship, Wave Knight also has a Lynx Mk 8 which must be jolly useful for runs ashore and they can probably arrange a bit of rough shooting too, if one should get bored at sea between port visits, viz: Royal Marines sniper brings six-hour drugs chase to end as Wave Knight delivers £40m blow to traffickers | Royal Navy

Perhaps a word of caution for her Lynx pilot - if their ex-hooligan VIP should be heard to mutter “Hello sailor, I nose a bit about hicopleters, can I ‘ave a go ?” he might be well-advised not to let him anywhere near the controls, to ensure they don’t have to send for another one.

LFH

..............
Lordflasheart is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2016, 19:02
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,203
Received 117 Likes on 53 Posts
LFH,

The embarked Lynx wasn't the story though was it? It was yet another filler thread by a poster who likes to clog the forum with ****e.
downsizer is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2016, 08:55
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,035
Received 2,903 Likes on 1,244 Posts
PDR I was talking past tense.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2016, 09:43
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mordor
Posts: 1,315
Received 54 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
PDR I was talking past tense.
Well you have to go a long way back into the past - back to the Maxwell incident in fact.

Philip Green didn't raid the pension fund - he may have been less than generous in putting new money in, but he didn't help himself to anything that was in there. In this regard the BHS pension fund is only one of the more extreme cases of the fall-out of the change in pension accounting rules back in something like 2003, which exposed previously unrecognised shortfalls in pension funds.

Before that you can go back to the tory governments of the Thatcher and Major era which actually forced companies to take "pension holidays" because they thought they were using the pension funds as tax-shelters for profits.

Then there was Gordon Brown's tax raid on pension funds in 1997. The combination of the two created these unsuspected unadequacies in pension funds. By the time tit was realised we'd moved out of prosperous times and most companies literally couldn't afford to make-good the shortfall in any rapid timescale. In order to do that we need to return to an economy with higher growth, producing higher investment returns so that the funds can pay their liabilities from investment earnings rather than capital.

The "credit crunch" kinda put the kibosh on that, and this stupid Brexit malarky is likely to destreoy any remaining probability of addressing it this side of hell freezing over.

People will just have to accept the consequences of their decisions.

Here endeth the sermon!

PDR
PDR1 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2016, 10:59
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Glesga, Scotland
Age: 51
Posts: 230
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Give it a couple of years and he can have a aircraft carrier, minus the aircraft 😜
Now he could throw a heck of a party on that ,

In all seriousness we probably should have a royal yacht , IF it's to benefit UK industry,maybe the should either pay for it or at least contibute a sizeable amount.
BAE etc,has made a lot cash out MOD maybe time to give a little back as a investment in there own future.
fallmonk is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2016, 11:48
  #33 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,035
Received 2,903 Likes on 1,244 Posts
Downsizer

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.
Hence the post. If some of us didn't post anything, it would soon become a dull place, simply consisting of the cap comp.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2016, 17:53
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Fife
Posts: 271
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've spotted just the thing. Already crewed. And going free gratis!

Just got to find the thing now. When are we getting those P-8s again?

Rat-infested Russian ghost ship drifts towards Irish coast
Coochycool is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2016, 21:48
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry fallmonk I now disagree. Think they missed the boat by about 13 odd years. We talked about this as a crew at that time, we that then served RN. In fact in "The Officer" magazine it was well laid out how it could be done.
Times move on. We haven't the RN paid staff, and I don't think the public taxpaying voter would wear the cost. In my drink I thought it could maybe still do it if RN trained SME took charge of young British kids as some sort of training ship with a spin off with transporting the Royal Family....
Its not going to happen. No of us really deserve it... least the Royal Family, less even the RN. The country is in a different place and moving into a new time, even I see it.

Apologies for the bile. Age, drink and at times anger make me so.
Hangarshuffle is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.