Iran

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 330
Likes: 136
From: Cluedo
Hard to see why you’re attempting to compare UK and US forces. They are very different countries and UK’s forces are intended for defence of the UK and its interests with NATO and other allies. They are not intended for invading other countries. Maybe you’d do better comparing the US with countries having similar foreign policies.

Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 245
Likes: 94
From: yes
In the 24 hrs to 5 April around 15 to 18 ships have passed through the SofH. This marks the highest traffic since early March.
Of note is that a number of these vessels have been carrying Iranian oil meaning that Iran is now exporting more oil in money terms than before the conflict began.
Of note is that a number of these vessels have been carrying Iranian oil meaning that Iran is now exporting more oil in money terms than before the conflict began.

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 287
From: Nevada, USA
Some inaccuracies in the Ward Carroll video from retired USN & US Army guys.
The C-130J line is not closed and any new or in-use C-130J could be turned into replacement HC-130J and/or MC-130J at a maintenance depot given a lot of time & $ but the USAF does have significant numbers of each so probably not necessary.
If indeed the recovered WSO is a full colonel (US O-6), it isn't the 48th FW Commander - that is an O-7 post. The 2 x aircrew rated O-6s in 48th FW are the Deputy Wing CC and the OG CC. It might be the rank colonel was used in the POTUS announcement but actually meant lt col (O-5) which could be the sqn CC or DO.
https://www.lakenheath.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/
The C-130J line is not closed and any new or in-use C-130J could be turned into replacement HC-130J and/or MC-130J at a maintenance depot given a lot of time & $ but the USAF does have significant numbers of each so probably not necessary.
If indeed the recovered WSO is a full colonel (US O-6), it isn't the 48th FW Commander - that is an O-7 post. The 2 x aircrew rated O-6s in 48th FW are the Deputy Wing CC and the OG CC. It might be the rank colonel was used in the POTUS announcement but actually meant lt col (O-5) which could be the sqn CC or DO.
https://www.lakenheath.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/
Thread Starter
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...

Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,509
Likes: 7,252
From: Peripatetic
If indeed the recovered WSO is a full colonel (US O-6), it isn't the 48th FW Commander - that is an O-7 post. The 2 x aircrew rated O-6s in 48th FW are the Deputy Wing CC and the OG CC. It might be the rank colonel was used in the POTUS announcement but actually meant lt col (O-5) which could be the sqn CC or DO.

Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 111
Likes: 244
From: Brisbane, Australia




Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 3,314
From: Everett, WA
Originally Posted by Bell_ringer
Are there any accurate numbers to what this little exercise is costing the taxpayer?
It must be quite impressive by now.
Are there any accurate numbers to what this little exercise is costing the taxpayer?
It must be quite impressive by now.

Joined: Jan 2025
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 38
Likes: 87
From: New York
Indeed; speaking as a US taxpayer, there is also a morale boost to the citizenry. After experiencing the immeasurable costs of four years that included US astronauts stranded in space for months; a chinese "weather balloon" allowed to drift unopposed across our country; or the taliban handed the keys to $85B worth of our equipment while killing our soldiers - this bold, direct action to rescue one of ours is a refreshing change and I am grateful for it. Prayers for those serving and for a quick end to the hostilities.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,030
From: Reading, UK
Granted, the blades could be folded, but isn't the rotor mast height too great to fit in the C-295's hold?



Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,914
Likes: 608
From: surfing, watching for sharks
Hard to see why you’re attempting to compare UK and US forces. They are very different countries and UK’s forces are intended for defence of the UK and its interests with NATO and other allies. They are not intended for invading other countries. Maybe you’d do better comparing the US with countries having similar foreign policies.

Joined: Apr 2010
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 958
Likes: 1,239
From: Herefordshire
You know the answer. I just said that the US and UK have fundamentally different systems of government and defence. Comparisons are futile. I’m sure we are both very happy about that.

Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 245
Likes: 94
From: yes
But the loss of several aircraft to recover a mere couple of airmen is considered a good exchange.
Because we in this part of the world we value life over matériel. Note spelling.


Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,371
Likes: 926
From: Den Haag
You've been pilloried a bit. It's quite amusing. Are you an Accountant? If so you're probably on the wrong forum.
But the loss of several aircraft to recover a mere couple of airmen is considered a good exchange.
Because we in this part of the world we value life over matériel. Note spelling.
But the loss of several aircraft to recover a mere couple of airmen is considered a good exchange.
Because we in this part of the world we value life over matériel. Note spelling.



Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,914
Likes: 608
From: surfing, watching for sharks
The answer is the opposite of what you’re trying to push. The UK armed forces are structured and equipped to participate in offensive operations, just on a smaller scale than the US.



Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,914
Likes: 608
From: surfing, watching for sharks
I would worry more about the treatment by captors who were on the receiving end of what the F15 dropped.

Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 245
Likes: 94
From: yes
I'm not American and no fan of the current regime. I should point out I am a pilot so obviously I favour pilots.
Watching a pilot humiliated is not for me.


Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 4,426
From: 3rd Rock, #29B
Maybe, I went to Oshkosh 2016. I met the Blackhawk pilot who was captured in Somalia, whose name escapes me. He told us of his experiences. Being Oshkosh you could talk to him directly and I did. I told him how I believed he was a dead man when I saw him on TV. And my relief when he was released. It was quite emotional for me.
I'm not American and no fan of the current regime. I should point out I am a pilot so obviously I favour pilots.
Watching a pilot humiliated is not for me.
I'm not American and no fan of the current regime. I should point out I am a pilot so obviously I favour pilots.
Watching a pilot humiliated is not for me.
Super 6-1 was commanded by CW3 Cliff "Elvis" Wolcott and CW3 Donovan "Bull" Briley as co-pilot, both killed on the impact. SSG Daniel Busch and SGT Jim Smith were the snipers on board, and survived the crash, defending their own aircraft, Smith wrote the eye witness statement of Daniel Busch's silver star awarded posthumously, Busch succumbing to multiple gunshot wounds received in the defence of the aircraft and the survivors.
CMOHS Randy Shugart
CMOS Gary Gordon
VA narrative Daniel Busch

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 69
Likes: 2
From: Oz
Nine (9) AAR platforms appear to be just airborne out of Tel Aviv eastbound (10th heading towards UK). That's a lot!
Also Saudi SAAB 2000 AEW&C over Riyahd, plus a NATO E-3 and Turkish TB-2 in SE Turkiye.
Also Saudi SAAB 2000 AEW&C over Riyahd, plus a NATO E-3 and Turkish TB-2 in SE Turkiye.
Last edited by Barry Bernoulli; 6th April 2026 at 03:18.


Joined: Jun 2009
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 645
From: florida
Wow!. Must be big receivers, like 52's
Gums guesses...
Mass gaggle, but could azlso be a "flush" to
get off a potential target
Gums guesses...
Mass gaggle, but could azlso be a "flush" to
get off a potential target
Last edited by gums; 6th April 2026 at 03:17. Reason: added



