BATTLE OF PALMDALE - 60 years ago today.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Timbukthree
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BATTLE OF PALMDALE - 60 years ago today.
Sixty years ago today, on August 16, 1956, the skies over Southern California became the stage for an aerial battle:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Palmdale
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Palmdale
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Clearly lessons in probability theory, gravity, and damage limitation were lacking.
(From Wiki) "As the drone passed over Palmdale's downtown, Mighty Mouse rockets fell like hail" . . . . a chunk of shrapnel from one Air Force rocket burst through the front window of her home, ricocheted off the ceiling, went through a wall and came to rest in a kitchen cupboard." More rocket fragments completely penetrated a home and garage on 4th Street East. One rocket landed right in front of a vehicle being driven west on California State Route 138 near Tenth Street West, of which one tire was shredded and many holes were punched through the car's body. Two men in Placerita Canyon had been eating in their utility truck; right after they left it to sit under the shade of a tree, a rocket struck it destroying it. Many fires were started near Santa Clarita, with three large ones and many smaller ones in and around Palmdale.
It took 500 firefighters two days to bring the brushfires under control. 1000 acres were burned. There were no fatalities.
It took 500 firefighters two days to bring the brushfires under control. 1000 acres were burned. There were no fatalities.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes
on
64 Posts
Originally Posted by Heathrow Harry
or flying alongside and tipping the wing as per V1 tactics
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the finest gung-ho American traditions of armaments discharge ...
"In all, the Air Force element fired 208 rockets and were unable to shoot the Hellcat down."
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes
on
64 Posts
Do I get the feeling that Air Defence has never been the USAF's strong point?
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England
Age: 65
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Once the rockets were expended, tipping the drone might have worked.
IIRC, physical contact wasn't required. Simply placing the wing tip under and gradually lifting caused the airflow to lift the wing.
Incidentally, the first V-1 destroyed using this method was by a P-51.
IIRC, physical contact wasn't required. Simply placing the wing tip under and gradually lifting caused the airflow to lift the wing.
Incidentally, the first V-1 destroyed using this method was by a P-51.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Timbukthree
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coincidentally, the maiden flight of the Northrop F-89 Scorpion was also on August 16th, albeit 8 years earlier, in 1948.
The Northrop F-89 Scorpion managed a couple of firsts, beginning with its being the first interceptor aircraft designed specifically for all-weather military missions.
A later derivative of the D model was the F-89J which could be armed with two unguided Genie nuclear rockets, and the Scorpion became the first aircraft to fire such a weapon in July 1957.
Regarding the speed of drone during the intercept, it is not known, however, given radio contact with the drone was lost shortly after departure, and the initial intercept occurred at 30,000 ft., the F6F drone was probably doing less than 300 kts. The F-89D Scorpion was capable of just over 550 kts in level flight.
The Northrop F-89 Scorpion managed a couple of firsts, beginning with its being the first interceptor aircraft designed specifically for all-weather military missions.
A later derivative of the D model was the F-89J which could be armed with two unguided Genie nuclear rockets, and the Scorpion became the first aircraft to fire such a weapon in July 1957.
Regarding the speed of drone during the intercept, it is not known, however, given radio contact with the drone was lost shortly after departure, and the initial intercept occurred at 30,000 ft., the F6F drone was probably doing less than 300 kts. The F-89D Scorpion was capable of just over 550 kts in level flight.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes
on
64 Posts
A Genie could have solved the crisis in moments ... possibly
Torrey Canyon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrey_Canyon_oil_spill
"The British government was strongly criticised for its handling of the incident, which was at that time the costliest shipping disaster ever. The RAF and the Royal Navy also came in for ridicule, as 25% of the 42 bombs dropped missed the enormous stationary target."
People in glass houses..............
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrey_Canyon_oil_spill
"The British government was strongly criticised for its handling of the incident, which was at that time the costliest shipping disaster ever. The RAF and the Royal Navy also came in for ridicule, as 25% of the 42 bombs dropped missed the enormous stationary target."
People in glass houses..............
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But .. but .. a total of two hundred and eight rockets, with barely even a disturbance of the Hellcats steady flight path??? 
With a 250kt speed advantage, one would think a Scorpion would be able to at least dive on the Hellcat. It's not like there was a skilled pilot at the controls of the Hellcat, carrying out nimble evasive manouevres ....
With a 250kt speed advantage, one would think a Scorpion would be able to at least dive on the Hellcat. It's not like there was a skilled pilot at the controls of the Hellcat, carrying out nimble evasive manouevres ....
Oh my, that seems to be painting with a very broad brush, I think you will find that some USAF interceptors and crews were quite capable- especially when you look at the F-106. The F-101 and F-102 also had some utility in this role, and the F-4 when pressed into the role even though it was not a true interceptor- and then we have the F-15 and F-16 which have been used for "air-defense". Surely they are quite capable. The F-104 saw limited service as an "interceptor" for the USAF.
Earlier jet interceptors including the F-89 all had limitations, and many suffered from the "guns are no longer needed mantra" and the unguided 2.75 inch folding fin rocket was hardly the best weapon for hitting a small enemy aircraft (or errant drone).
Yes even the iconic Javelin and EE Lightning had limitations...