Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Nuclear air crash simulation reveals 'plain English' need

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Nuclear air crash simulation reveals 'plain English' need

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jun 2016, 09:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 59°09N 002°38W (IATA: SOY, ICAO: EGER)
Age: 80
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nuclear air crash simulation reveals 'plain English' need

A mock exercise in which a US aircraft carrying a nuclear weapon crashed over England has revealed the importance of "plain English", a report has found.
BBC report
ricardian is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2016, 15:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the point of any exercise is to find the bits that don't work - not the ones that do..................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2016, 16:03
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,813
Received 141 Likes on 65 Posts
Having spent much of my controlling life mixing USAF and RAF traffic ... I can't agree more.

"Divided by a common language" was never so true back then. That's why we had a USAF Maj/Lt Col at Eastern Radar to attempt to act as an interpreter, and why we used to visit the USAF Units in East Anglia to try to explain that there was no charge for simply saying "Pan, Pan, Pan" instead of "Hey Eastern, we have a problem request recovery ..."

My 'best' example was a TF-100 that had ejected off the Lincs coast east of Strubby back in '66, when I was on Approach. Guy in his parachute plaintively calling on his SARBE ... "This is Wiggins, anybody there?" <repeat> ... Fortunately the DF trace gave me a clue, I had a Dominie just airborne on Navex, so vectored him down the DF trace. Eventually Capt Wiggins was found and recovered, although sadly not his colleague.

Being 'standard' is boring, but at least it works.
MPN11 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2016, 16:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,196
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
I recall a very large NATO maritime exercise in the 80s, everything that wasn't a pro-word was in NUCO or NAMAT until an excited voice from a USN Reserve P3 came up with:

"Hey Valdez we got ourselves a submarine down here!!"

Well contact reports should be in clear shouldn't they.

YS
Yellow Sun is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2016, 22:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
NUCO?

NAMAT?

Sort of makes the point. Admittedly I have been out of the game for 40 years now but I frequently find the proliferation of abbreviations and acronyms on here makes some posts all but unintelligible. Fine for those in the know, but the OP is making the point that in many situations not everyone will be speaking the same language - even if they are all speaking English.
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2016, 08:24
  #6 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
NUCO/UNNUCO were certainly proword whereas NAMAT was not a proword.

TTN, as a NavRad, and a tanker one at that can be forgiven for not knowing his way around the arcane siggy world. It befell to me to give the first TriStar crew destined for Mount Pleasant a crash course in codes and authentication when they arrived at ASI, prior to that the Strat (T) force (?) had been immune to codes and tactical stuff
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2016, 10:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: A very long way North
Posts: 469
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
We used to provide a standby cover for US nuclear flights for scenarios exactly such as this.
Despite all the drills and instructions, I couldn't help feeling that what would actually happen is that just as we had got the cordons etc all set up the Americans would turn up, simply shoot everybody within about 400yds and take over themselves.
PlasticCabDriver is online now  
Old 14th Jun 2016, 14:57
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,813
Received 141 Likes on 65 Posts
I could suggest that 400 yards is ambitious ... I would feel vulnerable at 200 yards, though
MPN11 is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2016, 16:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,289
Received 731 Likes on 255 Posts
Divided by a common language indeed.

One of my hats involved representing UK on NATO and AFCENT Met. Committee meetings. One Brit only, lots of US Bird Colonels and half colonels of course. A slack handful of Dutch, Belgian and German, sometimes a Dane and an Italian. And a German civilian chairman.

The meetings were conducted in English, and whenever the Chairman wanted a point clarifying or a Minute drafting, he always turned to me, as a "native language speaker". This caused some stress at times with the cousins.

Fortunately I had not gone deaf at that time.
langleybaston is online now  
Old 15th Jun 2016, 10:20
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 30 Miles from the A1
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Those dreaded words "Stand-by for a PIM in NUCO". By the time the kneepad and chinagraph decode had been completed you had been shot down by the ship or needed the tanker!
2Planks is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.