Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

$300 million on JSF... are they MAD ?!?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.
View Poll Results: AIR6000 - what's your choice?
F15E Strike Eagle
40
18.69%
F35 JSF
57
26.64%
F22 Raptor
40
18.69%
F18 E/F Super Hornet
23
10.75%
Typhoon / Rafale / F16 / other...
54
25.23%
Voters: 214. This poll is closed

$300 million on JSF... are they MAD ?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Dec 2004, 20:09
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South Central UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With regard to RTS - QinetiQ does not impose, advice is provided to the Platform IPT. Moreover, it has never been different, when Boscombe was A&AEE they recommended to ACAS - he did not have to accept what was said!

lm
lightningmate is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2005, 15:50
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: globetrotter
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem with siging up as a partner years ahead of production is things like this happen (see below) production moves to the right...costs skyrocket and capabilties suffer in the meantime.

US media yesterday... paraphrased ..

US to scale back on future fighters

A Pentagon decision ......change in strategic priorities. Rumsfeld trying to transform the military to deal with unconventional threats....

"What does Al Qaeda's air force look like?" said one defense official working on the Pentagon's assessment, known as the Quadrennial Defense Review.

......some inside the Defense Department say that the deepest cuts could come in the Joint Strike Fighter program.....the Pentagon could cut the Air Force's allotment of the planes by half.
Officials involved in the review process say that the option of canceling one or both of the programs is on the table.....

...... Pentagon officials hoped to make some decisions about weapons programs by September or October, as the Defense Department prepared its fiscal year 2007 budget.

The Joint Strike Fighter and the F/A-22 have been plagued by cost overruns and production delays. ..... the Government Accountability Office called the JSF's original business case, laid out by the Pentagon in 1996, "unexecutable."

"When you have difficult budget choices to make, several of the Pentagon's expensive modernization programs become likely targets," said Andrew Krepinevich of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments in Washington.

"The JSF sits at the top of that list."

Food for thought on A6000

bb
Boogeyboard is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2005, 20:10
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IIRC A book writen 25 years ago by Norm Augustine (CEO of Lockheed Martin) "Augustine's Laws" had an analysis of the unit cost of fighter aircraft and if the unit cost on U.S. fighter aircraft were plotted from the early 1950's by about 2040 or so the entire U.S. defense budget would be needed to buy one aircraft. "Just buy one aeroplane and let the aviators take turns flying it"
Iron City is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2005, 14:30
  #84 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,462
Received 1,623 Likes on 740 Posts
Yeah, just been on a course where someone did the figures and plotted the Typhoon - slap bang on the curve....
ORAC is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2005, 19:58
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Longton, Lancs, UK
Age: 80
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well that's OK then - for if it sat above the curve then there'd be a real concern. I could raise you and show another curve, using 05 Typhoon unit cost, that breaks the Augustine 'rule'; and if we plotted out LCCs, the likes of Typhoon, Grippen and Rafale would similarly break the trend.

Last edited by jindabyne; 4th Aug 2005 at 20:11.
jindabyne is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.