Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

X-FACTOR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jun 2016, 15:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 52
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question X-FACTOR

No, not that awful TV programme but our additional 14.5% pay supplement for the hardship that serving in the Forces brings.

My little payslip arrived in the mail today (noting that it now arrives after the Pay Month has passed rather than during the Pay Month it refers to ) and tucked away in the Payroll Information box in the bottom left hand corner (the one that always used to remind you about the wonderful AIP system) it now breaks my salary down into the Core Salary, any supplement rate and then the 14.5% X-Factor amount. I'm certain this a new way of displaying how much Mrs Mighty expects me to hand over to her on an annual basis so I can't help wondering why this change of approach

Could it be the MOD lining up a future change in where we might expect to see an annual payrise (the pitiful 1%) applied to - i.e just the Core Salary element???

Maybe not, but I just can't help feeling cynical
Mightycrewseven is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2016, 16:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the 1% inflation pay-rise is applied before the 14.5% X-factor or after, it doesn't matter. Unless the 14.5% is calculated before the 1% is applied, and then that number is added after the 1% pay rise.......which is just plain wrong.

Perhaps you're seeing shadows that simply aren't there?
MSOCS is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2016, 18:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,206
Received 118 Likes on 54 Posts
You should be more concerned about the Pay Colonels intentions to reduce and or remove X factor entirely as a means of reducing the military wage bill. Their thoughts are that you are compensated enough for "military hassle" by other allowances such as OA and LSA.

I **** you not.
downsizer is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2016, 19:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
downsizer,

This is a fact or rumour? First hand?

Regards
MSOCS is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2016, 23:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 28 Posts
A potential pay cut all round of up to 14.5%? That should be retention positive! As ever it would be those most needed who would walk. I sincerely hope it's just unsubstantiated rumour.....
Ken Scott is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2016, 06:52
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,206
Received 118 Likes on 54 Posts
It's true sadly.

There is pressure to reduce the wage and pension bill even after NEM. The options range from the slightly less palatable choice of making X factor non pensionable, a sliding reduction due to other allowances, and an outright removal due to other allowances. There is talk of making it a sliding scale, paid either at a greater rate in the early part of a career (as the perception is you go away and get messed around more at the start of a career) or conversely you get none at the start and more at the end (when getting messed around might drive you out the door).

Small fly in the ointment is X factor is determined by the AFPRB, not the sS pay colonels. However that problem wouldn't be difficult to fix should they wish.

However, surely, the point is a 10-15% pay cut would be too far for anyone serving now wouldn't it? New entrants only perhaps?
downsizer is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2016, 08:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I think the 5 years of real-terms pay cut, due to the recession and < inflation pay increase limit per annum, has taken its toll on some folks in general. We have a government saying we're the best performing economy in the region. ToS have been changed, the pension goal-posts moved further away, allowances have been cut/eroded, and we have a recruitment issue in some key roles.

Pay peanuts, expect monkeys. The rest will walk, I'm sure. More through perception of not being valued.
MSOCS is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2016, 09:13
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by downsizer
It's true sadly.

There is pressure to reduce the wage and pension bill even after NEM. The options range from the slightly less palatable choice of making X factor non pensionable, a sliding reduction due to other allowances, and an outright removal due to other allowances. There is talk of making it a sliding scale, paid either at a greater rate in the early part of a career (as the perception is you go away and get messed around more at the start of a career) or conversely you get none at the start and more at the end (when getting messed around might drive you out the door).

Small fly in the ointment is X factor is determined by the AFPRB, not the sS pay colonels. However that problem wouldn't be difficult to fix should they wish.

However, surely, the point is a 10-15% pay cut would be too far for anyone serving now wouldn't it? New entrants only perhaps?
Having spoken to a sS Pay Colonel about this - noting it was over a beer, and pre-SDR - I think this was part of a work stream tied to NEM that has (probably) died a death. The intention was to tie pay to type of work. You are a volunteer for short notice OpTours, take the 'hard jobs' that require buggering around, remain on the Command/Executive track: get paid everything, including full X-Factor. On the other hand, if you're in a stable 8-4 Mon - Fri Office job, stability guaranteed for 4+ years, not available for Op Tours etc, then why are we paying you X Factor?

To the best of my knowledge, this idea died a death because the Career Managers screamed about "lack of flexibility"/having to do their job. There was also concerns that too many people would opt for option B and not option A...
alfred_the_great is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2016, 10:18
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,206
Received 118 Likes on 54 Posts
ATG

My info is more recent and the work is still ongoing. I don't think the three services can yet agree a way forward, so whilst your source may not support, that isn't perhaps the view of the other services?
downsizer is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2016, 21:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by downsizer
ATG

My info is more recent and the work is still ongoing. I don't think the three services can yet agree a way forward, so whilst your source may not support, that isn't perhaps the view of the other services?
Quite probably. The RN is pushing back hard - mainly because our Career Management process(es) simply can't cope with that kind of flexibility. We have zero capacity not to deploy/send to sea nearly everyone. The people doing the cushty 8-4 jobs are either on FTRS or on their minimum time ashore, and are heading back to sea sharpish.

The Army - specifically the vast swathes in the "regional brigades" - on the other hand...
alfred_the_great is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.