Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

A-X all over again - USAF pushes for A-10 replacement

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

A-X all over again - USAF pushes for A-10 replacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Apr 2016, 09:30
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sussex
Age: 66
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Assuming that this project does progress, what confuses me is where the manpower is going to come from, I understood that the USAF wanted to retire the A10 so that the maintainers could be trained on the F35... So does this project mean fewer F35s or is the USAF expanding?
PhilipG is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2016, 12:17
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F-35 drivers who are sitting it out waiting for the Mod 10 software to be fixed..............
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 03:45
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
I can just see it.


Stealthy, supersonic, supercruising and about $1 Billion dollars each..
stilton is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2018, 07:42
  #24 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,438
Received 1,597 Likes on 733 Posts
Close Air Support Fly-off Farce

Close Air Support Fly-off Farce

F-35 Versus A-10 Fly-off Tests Designed to Mislead

ORAC is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2018, 13:03
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
F-35 Versus A-10 Fly-off Tests Designed to Mislead
Quelle surprise...

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2018, 13:20
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Green and pleasant land
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
Close Air Support Fly-off Farce

Close Air Support Fly-off Farce

F-35 Versus A-10 Fly-off Tests Designed to Mislead

Interesting... and scary.

What a crock of sh!t when it's the troops on the ground going in harms way not those shining seats with their ass (and overfilled wallets in their back pocket)
cargosales is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2018, 13:29
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,228
Received 415 Likes on 258 Posts
Originally Posted by Heathrow Harry
ATG - using a part of the Deterent Triad to support guys in the front-line against an AK-47 armed guerilla is ridiculous

An A-10 replacement needs to be exactly that - something relatively simple that we can buy in large numbers
Who is we, Harry? How many A-10's did the UK buy?
You don't need the A-10 to take out a guerilla with an AK-47. (Though they do a lovely job of it when asked)
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2018, 14:12
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
If we find ourselves fighting Russian, Chinese, or Noth Korean Tanks?
SASless is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2018, 15:41
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The article sounds outrageous, but I wonder where is the "other lobby"? OK, the proponents of F-35 are doing their job trying to justify as many "use cases" as possible. But if it's so obvious that it can't replace A-10 in the considered (close combat) scenarios why do the people who really believe it and have arguments "in hands" (e.g. real situations they encountered while fighting jihaddists) not use them in front of "decision makers" is some tough way?
A_Van is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2018, 16:10
  #30 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
It would certainly appear to be a competition written with F35 rules. I am surprised they didn't include an operating base 100 miles plus from target thus favouring the F35 transit times unless it would cripple the over target time.

Once watched a BAF 4xF16 performing a CSAR practise with an attack going in every 30 seconds - impressive - something an A10 could probably do with 2.

I suppose they could look at the effectiveness of UK Tornado or AV8B in that mission.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2018, 19:36
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
Who is we, Harry? How many A-10's did the UK buy?
You don't need the A-10 to take out a guerilla with an AK-47. (Though they do a lovely job of it when asked)
"we" as in the Western Alliance dear boy - TBH I always felt a couple of squadrons of RAF A-10' would have been more useful in a real war than some pop-up helicopters.......

At the end of the day I remember something in "Flight" ... almost certainly "Straight & Level"

" hey , Ivan, how did the NATO deep strike force do?"

"Dunno, tovarich... can you move your T-72 off the esplanade? the mayor of Calais says it's blocking the view..."
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2018, 21:32
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,671
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Can the A-10 FIRE `SINGLE-SHOT...?
sycamore is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2018, 13:27
  #33 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by sycamore
Can the A-10 FIRE `SINGLE-SHOT...?
If one bullet is loaded, maybe
Pontius Navigator is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.