Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

New Russian Security Strategy

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New Russian Security Strategy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jan 2016, 06:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts
New Russian Security Strategy

Signed by Putin on 31st Dec 2015. USA and NATO identified as threats for the first time since the end of the Cold War.


Putin names United States among threats in new Russian security strategy

Russia’s national security strategy for 2016 in 9 key points

Last edited by ORAC; 4th Jan 2016 at 07:53.
ORAC is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2016, 09:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At least they have a security strategy...as opposed to a knee-jerk to whatever's in yesterday's Daily Mail.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2016, 18:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Lost somewhere near the final frontier
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not a security strategy! It's a propaganda statement, no more. If it were a real security strategy it would identify real threats and outline how they would be countered.
SandyW is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2016, 18:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london,uk
Posts: 735
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
"for the first time"

Thats a joke. Russia and the Russians are obsessed with getting revenge for cold war. Nato destroyed the empire Nato stands in their way to get it back.

Here's friendly Russian threatening to Nuke a Nato capital, in 2008

Russia threatens nuclear attack on Poland over US missile shield deal - Telegraph
peter we is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2016, 19:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Washington.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,077
Received 151 Likes on 53 Posts
As ridiculous as the Russian propaganda is, I am sure NATO members collectively and individually take it seriously. Vlad the Terrible is one dangerous fellow.
GlobalNav is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2016, 12:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
he's really short of cash as well .................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2016, 15:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,224
Received 412 Likes on 257 Posts
Originally Posted by Heathrow Harry
he's really short of cash as well .................
Pretty sure that starting a war won't solve that problem, as wars are very, very expensive.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2016, 16:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lancashire
Age: 48
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
Pretty sure that starting a war won't solve that problem, as wars are very, very expensive.
As history shows, that's usually the very reason for starting a war.

ORAC, it's US&A, not USA.
Thelma Viaduct is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2016, 16:42
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,224
Received 412 Likes on 257 Posts
Originally Posted by Thelma Viaduct
ORAC, it's US&A, not USA.
That would be incorrect. Noting the usual wind up antics from Thelma today.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2016, 17:09
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: eastcoastoz
Age: 76
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pretty sure he's using that authoritative, educational documentary presenter, Borat, as the reference for that.
Stanwell is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2016, 19:05
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,224
Received 412 Likes on 257 Posts
Originally Posted by Stanwell
I'm pretty sure he's using that authoritative, educational documentary presenter, Borat, as the reference for that.
Another wind up artist. (Must laud his choice of Isla as his gal, however. )
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2016, 18:11
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The articles behind the URLs in the first post are nothing but the authors' own interpretations of the original document. I used to never read such docs because they are just general propaganda published mainly for housewives. Real stuff is in the General Staff and FSB documents and obviously secret. However, having browsed the official doc quickly now (in Russian), I could not find anything related to direct pointing to the US as a threat or, even worse, an enemy. It is rather said that expansion of NATO and its appearance on the Russian borders generates certain threats. IMHO, this is true, but so what? Stupid Gorbachyov pulled everything out and slowly this "vacuum" has been filled in by NATO, "trivial physics".
Growth of the Russian military power is obviously a threat to the West, but again, so what? Russia was not modernizing its weapons since late 80's, everything has got "rusty" and sooner or later should have been updated.

We live in such a world for some 70 years, and if the ruling politicians can be wise enough, nothing happens. Just not let idiots, paranoids and neurotics be close to the decision making.

IMHO all (Europe, Russia, US) are stupid enough not to see that if they do not consolidate in some way in the near future, the growing islamic extremism will bring real harm and pain to all of them/us. All those IS/Daesh, Al Qaeda, Taliban are just the beginning. And these guys do not negotiate, sign treaties, agree on inspections, etc. They just shoot, cut heads and blow up cities and civilians. Killing their leaders does not help, birth rate in these countries is way higher than in "white" ones, thus the future does not look optimistic if really new approaches are not found.
A_Van is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2016, 19:51
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london,uk
Posts: 735
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Well the solution with Daesh is simple: Kill. Them. All.

Its not one we can or want to apply to Russia.
peter we is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.