LOA for Scotland
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOA for Scotland
After the next Scotish elections it is very likely that the Scottish Parliament will add additional income tax to its residents. Thus servicemen in Scotland will be worse off than those south of the border.
How will the MoD ensure our servicemen are not disadvantaged?
How will the MoD ensure our servicemen are not disadvantaged?
The answer for the moment is that the MoD are still in discussions regarding how service personel will be treated. There are similar discussions with other public sectors.
I understand that it will make zero difference to service personnel posted to Scotland as there is an established precedent of where we theoretically live for tax purposes. For those with direct links to Scotland (place of birth, established family links, home owner, spouse liable for Scotish taxation etc etc) things are less clear but the rumours out of MoD is that the status quo will endure. It has been rather quiet on spouses though.
I understand that it will make zero difference to service personnel posted to Scotland as there is an established precedent of where we theoretically live for tax purposes. For those with direct links to Scotland (place of birth, established family links, home owner, spouse liable for Scotish taxation etc etc) things are less clear but the rumours out of MoD is that the status quo will endure. It has been rather quiet on spouses though.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it would be suicide for current finance minister to increase taxes prior to elections planned for next year. The bad news normally comes early in a new parliament.
What about contractors supporting MoD?
I remember paying council tax in Scotland when my friends south of the border did not.
Chinook240. I believe servicemen do benefit as you suggested. This just adds to the problem.
What about contractors supporting MoD?
I remember paying council tax in Scotland when my friends south of the border did not.
Chinook240. I believe servicemen do benefit as you suggested. This just adds to the problem.
Last edited by Phoney Tony; 16th Dec 2015 at 08:28.
Swinney will change nothing before the Scottish elections but watch this space after that! If he goes for a full 10p increase on top of the standard rate it will mean thousands of pounds extra tax for those earning up to the higher rate level! I suspect there will be a mass exodus from Scotland and LOA will be necessary for those in the Armed Forces.
What happens if any of the 'scot tax' bands/rates are lowered? Will HM Govt reduce pay for HM Forces in Scotland - I doubt it. Therefore, I'd predict a small 'Scotland weighting' like the one for London (if needed). That way it can be adjusted each year when the allowances are set.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Being provocative here but...
If it's true that those posted to Scotland benefit from the higher spending on public services there - free prescriptions, university have already been mentioned - then why shouldn't they pay the higher taxes these require?
If it's true that those posted to Scotland benefit from the higher spending on public services there - free prescriptions, university have already been mentioned - then why shouldn't they pay the higher taxes these require?
LOA for Scotland
Possibly technically correct were this to apply to Northern Ireland, but not for Scotland except in the Hebrides, Orkney and Shetland .....
Jack
Possibly technically correct were this to apply to Northern Ireland, but not for Scotland except in the Hebrides, Orkney and Shetland .....
Jack
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perhaps because the average serviceman will benefit from neither free university or free prescriptions?
These things are of benefit in the long term, not the short term. Most servicemen will not be there long enough to benefit.
You could equally argue that the people based in London get all the advantages of living in the capital, so why do they get extra?
Perhaps because the average serviceman will benefit from neither free university or free prescriptions?
These things are of benefit in the long term, not the short term. Most servicemen will not be there long enough to benefit.
You could equally argue that the people based in London get all the advantages of living in the capital, so why do they get extra?
These things are of benefit in the long term, not the short term. Most servicemen will not be there long enough to benefit.
You could equally argue that the people based in London get all the advantages of living in the capital, so why do they get extra?
Because servicemen don't have dependants who might benefit from free higher education and/or prescription charges, do they Tourist?
Also, "advantages of living in London"? You must be referring to the overpriced everything, the high crime rates, and daily commutes from hell. I'm guessing you don't live in London.
Also, "advantages of living in London"? You must be referring to the overpriced everything, the high crime rates, and daily commutes from hell. I'm guessing you don't live in London.
The real point is that Scotland is still part of the United Kingdom! So why should they be allowed to vary tax! They already get the extra payments in the Barnet Formula! Cameron should be much firmer in handling this. After all the result of the referendum clearly showed that the majority of those living in Scotland want to stay in the Union
Which is why they're still in the union, Newt. The result of the Scottish elections however gave the SNP the mandate to push for tax varying powers, which is what they got. For better or worse, it's called democracy.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^
Absolutely. And so is the right to choose your tax domicile, if you are lucky enough to have a potential "foot in both camps".
There are a great many wealthy people in Scotland, who can, with a few mouse clicks, be tax domiciled in England, even - and perhaps especially - if Scotland becomes independent.
The movers and shakers in Scotland are well aware of that and will tread very carefully before doing something which will invoke "the law of unintended consequences".
Absolutely. And so is the right to choose your tax domicile, if you are lucky enough to have a potential "foot in both camps".
There are a great many wealthy people in Scotland, who can, with a few mouse clicks, be tax domiciled in England, even - and perhaps especially - if Scotland becomes independent.
The movers and shakers in Scotland are well aware of that and will tread very carefully before doing something which will invoke "the law of unintended consequences".
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 57
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^ You are of course assuming that an independent Scotland will have a concept of domicile, will allow domicile to determine taxation and will allow people to choose their domicile.
The idea that people can change their tax domicile with a few mouse clicks is very amusing.
The idea that people can change their tax domicile with a few mouse clicks is very amusing.
The determination of taxable status is due to 'main residence'. If I should have 2 properties (owned or not), 1 in Scotland and 1 in England, Wales or N.Ireland, I can declare the non-Scotland property as my main residence. I would need to 'reside' in the non-Scotland address for 1 day more than the Scottish address to make this so. Details are here - https://www.gov.uk/government/public...axpayer-status
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
London is my idea of hell on balance (can't surf!), however most Londoners would not consider living anywhere else and you have to be obtuse to be unable to think of any big city pluses..
A very quick Google will show you that, contrary to the hysteria about sponging scots, Londoners have more spent on them per person than anybody else in the country. This despite the obvious economies of scale. They also have all the good shows, museums, concerts etc.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even the most cursory Google will find you a cost benefit calculation for the royal family in terms of revenue from tourism etc