Really?
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fair point, kit bag but the aircraft is for use of Her Majesty too. I phrased it as I did because thankfully HM wasn't on board for the disgraceful Angolan charter debacle.
I'm surprised by the negatives expressed here, of all places. This is a prestige role, formerly outsourced, now being handed back to the RAF.
I'm surprised by the negatives expressed here, of all places. This is a prestige role, formerly outsourced, now being handed back to the RAF.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,073
Received 2,940 Likes
on
1,252 Posts
Not being negative about the RAF taking the role back on, just pondering the way it has been costed. Personally, as I said I believe the RAF should carry the Monarch, the next in line, and all the excess baggage that follows on, Mp's..etc
