Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

LRS-B Decision

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Oct 2015, 09:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,457
Received 1,620 Likes on 739 Posts
LRS-B Decision

LRS-B (Long range strike bomber), decision reported to be announced after the stock market closes today (Tuesday 27th Oct).

Is the Air Force's Next Nuclear Bomber Trying to Get Itself Fired?
ORAC is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2015, 10:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 275 Likes on 111 Posts
Either the contract is going to go to Northrop Grumman (the maker of the B-2 bomber) or a joint bid between Boeing and Lockheed Martin.
A joint bid between the 2 companies which are infamous for long-delayed and over-budget military aircraft projects sich as KC-767I, KC-46A and F-35? YGBSM - that'd be a disaster.
BEagle is online now  
Old 27th Oct 2015, 11:58
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm not calling a winner, because we know that what we know we don't know is at least as important as what we do know, and that's before you take account of the stuff we do know that ain't so.

And you may quote me on that.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2015, 20:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: aus
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LM/b is my guess, but it's online in 15min
Live Stream 1
a1bill is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2015, 21:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Great Britain
Age: 51
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Northrop Grumman has won...



Apparently $1/2Bn each for 100 aircraft!!!
Corporal Clott is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2015, 22:19
  #6 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,457
Received 1,620 Likes on 739 Posts
Northrop Grumman Wins Air Force's Long Range Strike Bomber Contract

WASHINGTON – Northrop Grumman has won the contract to build the US Air Force’s next-generation Long Range Strike Bomber (LRS-B), an industry-shaping deal that breathes new life into the world's sixth-largest defense company.......

Speaking at the announcement, Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James said the bomber would "allow the Air Force to operate in tomorrow's high-end threat environment" and praised the work that went into the selection, in a move that sounded like a preemptive shot to any attempt by Boeing and Lockheed to challenge the award decision.

James said service acquisition officials “carefully considered” the offers from both teams, with the entire process carried out “with a high level of transparency with our industrial partners… we believe our decision represents the best value for our nation.”

At the announcement, service officials revealed:
  • According to Lt. Gen. Arnold Bunch, the military acquisition deputy, the two bomber teams offered up proposals with all industrial partners included — meaning providers for subcomponents such as engines have already been decided. However, Bunch said that information would remain secret for security reasons.
  • Risk-reduction efforts cost $1.9 billion from FY11 to FY15.
  • A tentative date for initial operating capability is 2025, although Gen. Robin Rand, commander of Global Strike Command, indicated that could change.
  • While many have referred to the bomber as the “B-3” as shorthand, Rand’s office will have final say on the designation, which has not been reached.
  • Air Force officials will make themselves open to Boeing and Lockheed as early as Friday for an explanation of why Northrop was selected, Bunch said.
What remains unknown at this time — details about the plane itself. The size, weight and payload remain unknowns, as do the extent of its stealth capabilities.

ORAC is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2015, 23:39
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Good one ORAC.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2015, 13:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
unless they really screwed up the Bidding process they were always a probablity for this - if they didn't get it the US would be down to 2 advanced airframe builders
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2015, 18:37
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 661
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting they have spent nearly $2bn on risk reduction in last 4 years. You might have expected some sort of Tech demo to have been developed or even flown for that much cash. A classified fly off under wraps perhaps?

Is it assumed to be subsonic again? Is it too early to exploit any of the hypersonic research? Is this manned or unmanned or tbd?
JFZ90 is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2015, 18:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Stay tuned and do not adjust your set.

LowObservable is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2015, 20:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by JFZ90
You might have expected some sort of Tech demo to have been developed or even flown for that much cash. A classified fly off under wraps perhaps?
Hmmm.

Mysterious delta jet over Texas
BossEyed is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2015, 20:50
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 275 Likes on 111 Posts
'Mysterious low-flying delta jets' were frequently reported over Nebraska and Kansas half a century ago....

In the '70s, one confused redneck rang SAC at Omahaw complaining "Dangest thing ah ever saw. Didn't have no tail 'n the wings began at the nose!"

'twas the mighty tin triangle on an OB route, of course. Not that we ever chased lone redneck pick up trucks or overflew feed lots. No siree, Bob, not HM's FC Vulcans....



....very often !
BEagle is online now  
Old 30th Oct 2015, 01:39
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,078
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Best to up the meds again Beagle.
West Coast is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2015, 02:36
  #14 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Dangest thing ah ever saw. Didn't have no tail 'n the wings began at the nose!"
Guess he never saw an F-102, F-106 or a B-58.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2015, 16:02
  #15 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,457
Received 1,620 Likes on 739 Posts
Boeing protest - as expected - but there seems little probability it will win. The speechifying from their supporters on the Hill should be entertaining......

Boeing Protests Northrop's Long Range Strike Bomber Contract
ORAC is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2015, 16:11
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 685
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Byron Callan, an analyst with Capital Alpha Partners ... estimated a 15 percent probability that the protest would be successful.

“We absolutely believe that the Air Force assumed there would have been a protest on the LRS-B contract award,” he wrote. “While there is the precedent of Boeing successfully protesting the tanker program to EADS and then winning the re-compete, this is a different acquisition team at the Air Force."
..and that, unlike in that case, both competitors happen to be US companies.
hoodie is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2015, 18:36
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
The fact that they're going with what appears to be a weak protest is worrisome, because it indicates that they don't care abut the GAO process per se. It's just a precursor to a political campaign.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2015, 21:05
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Arlington, Tx. US
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Time for the Government Accounting Office to revisit all those requirements that have not been met on the JSF and new tanker and start working on what should be reimbursed to the American citizen.

The Sultan
The Sultan is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2015, 13:58
  #19 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
The fact that they're going with what appears to be a weak protest is worrisome, because it indicates that they don't care abut the GAO process per se. It's just a precursor to a political campaign.
But why wouldn't they? They managed to steal back the Tanker contract on a protest technicality, what are the chances the acquisition team broke the rules on this one as well - pretty high I would think. This is the US DoD, whoever turns up in court with the tallest pile of paper and the most lawyers wins.
Two's in is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2015, 15:24
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aviation Week has an interesting article on possible 'LRS Details'. It's behind a paywall.

This and several other articles they've published are very reminisce of their reporting in the months leading up to the F-117 coming out of the closet.

Some highlights:

All three bidders flew "Next-Generation Long-Range Strike Demonstrators'. A picture of what is said to be one of them is here: http://aviationweek.com/site-files/a...eanMuskett.jpg.

Two engines, 2500 mile unrefueled range
30000 pound payload - carry the 30,000 pound 'mother of all bombs'?
Managed by the same organization that did the F-117
Low rate production (6-8/year)
Engine selection unknown

And as an old EF-111A EWO, the mention of a rumor of a companion 'penetrating electronic attack system' made me happy.
JimNtexas is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.