Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

How are RAF Pilots categorised into; Fast Jet, Multi-Engine, and Rotary Wing?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

How are RAF Pilots categorised into; Fast Jet, Multi-Engine, and Rotary Wing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Sep 2015, 11:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Scotland
Age: 27
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How are RAF Pilots categorised into; Fast Jet, Multi-Engine, and Rotary Wing?

Is it random selection, or based on assessment scores? Or are you asked to give your preferred Aircraft type?

Thanks.
Madden96 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 12:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: York
Posts: 517
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Some from column a, some from column b, your own preference is noted, but service needs come first.
muppetofthenorth is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 12:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Home
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's based on your performance in the bar:
Those that mix well with others, have interests outside of work and are generally 'good eggs' go mutis.
Those that want to sit outside in the rain and are a bit odd go helos
Those that stand in the middle of the room telling everyone about themselves and never listen to others but rather just wait for their turn to talk again go fast jets.
Legate is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 12:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
In my case (twice), alphabetical order.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 13:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,046
Received 2,919 Likes on 1,249 Posts
Fast Jet, Multi-Engine, and Rotary Wing?


Bigger watch, Bigger stomach and Bigger tent
NutLoose is online now  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 13:56
  #6 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
And age, when they grow up and become adults they are posted to multis.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 14:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Erewhon
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Ritual Casting of the Chicken Bones . . .
Brian W May is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 14:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mars
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talent, good looks and bull**** ability. Being QDW normally works for multi!
Schnowzer is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 15:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In the Radio Bay
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surgery

Not wanting to have my eyes moved closer together or teeth filed to points eased the decision to head rotary. And being repeatedly sick in a JP............
DunWinching is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 15:41
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, I wanted Sunderlands but they had all gone, so bid multi/ maritime, got Valley. Bid Canberra strike and got Canberra strike, but short coursed and went ECM. So rare in Signals Command that the CinC asked to see my 5000 Series because he had not seen a first tourist's folder!
Wander00 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 15:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lechlade, Glos.UK
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
I wanted Shackletons as my father was on Lancasters. But I was considered far too dangerous to fly with anyone else so went to Valley
sharpend is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 15:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Suffolk
Age: 74
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you can read and write Fast Jets. If you can read or write Multis. If you can read or write while being tossed about in a washing machine Helos.
Odanrot is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 15:46
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 60
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
The serious answer to the question.
All pilots are recruited to go fast jet. If they are good enough and training slots are available, that's the way they go.
If pilots are crap, they get chopped and go civilian usually.
Those who don't quite make FJ but are still decent, go to helos or multis, usually based on some of the things mentioned above. With extra experience, some go fast jet later in their career. Most don't!
We all banter the FJ boys, but a ****load of us would have loved to make it
jayteeto is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 15:58
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is it expected that all pilots who go multi will eventually become captains or are some destined to remain co-pilots throughout their service.?
goudie is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 16:53
  #15 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Goudie, the expectation is that they would become captain's but if course some didn't. Today, ever onwards has been replaced with onward and out so I guess there is more potential for captaincy.

On the OP, the FJ stream was 1st, Harriet, 2nd Jaguar,3rd F3, last GR.

Navs were similarly F3 if they had the apptitude, GR if they had the potential, Canberra if they needed more experience.

On Multis the best went Nimrod.

But, as mentioned, even if you ticked the right boxes, if there were no slots then tuff titty.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 17:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: scotland
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Always thought it was based on personality, 3 grades, not a lot, some and plentiful. I will leave it to the experts to apportion who deserves what.
KPax is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 17:36
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 28 Posts
Is it expected that all pilots who go multi will eventually become captains or are some destined to remain co-pilots throughout their service.?
Goudie: in the same fashion that all RAF student pilots are recruited with FJ potential all ME students are expected to achieve captaincy at the end of their co-pilot's tour, ie: in only 3 years. At the end of this time they are 'boarded' for captaincy - these days it's a paper exercise but it used to involve wearing No 1s & sitting before a board comprised of SASO & a load of Sqn Cdrs being asked a bunch of questions to assess your suitability, on top of the paper exercise based on your reports of the past 3 years. Those that passed were considered suitable for a captain's slot but might get sent to CFS to be a QFI first, those that failed would invariably end up in a ground tour & in a few years have another go as a co again, possibly on a different type. Few failed to make it after their second go & most got captaincy after their first in my experience. So it's quite a short time to captaincy certainly when compared to civil aviation.

PN: what was the top slot for ME training graduates has varied considerably over the years & personal preference did seem to be a fairly significant factor. Strangely Tristar was deemed to be at the top when I passed through Finningley, Nimrods was volunteers mainly, perhaps due to the limitations of the location, although there seemed to be no shortage..... More recently C130J was the top slot as it was glass cockpit & Tac, closely followed by C17 (ditto but non-Tac) with C130K at the bottom. Not entirely sure where the order currently lies but I expect when ab-initio slots on the A400M open up that will take the top ranking.
Ken Scott is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 18:16
  #18 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Aye, new aircraft usually get top billing.

Friend of mine working for HeavyLift, Airbus I think, said how the Belfast crews were looking forward to upgrading to a new type. Their hopes were dashed. HL preferred to recruit new and already trained rather than convert.

Still the RAF hasn't had that luxury.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 18:28
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,158
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by PN
On the OP, the FJ stream was 1st, Harriet, 2nd Jaguar,3rd F3, last GR.

Navs were similarly F3 if they had the apptitude, GR if they had the potential, Canberra if they needed more experience
Not when I went through:

Harrier, Lightning, Jaguar, GR1/Bucc then F4 (aggressively low average ) in that order.

Best Navs went mud mover first.
just another jocky is online now  
Old 27th Sep 2015, 19:05
  #20 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
JAJ, depends on which time slice you take, but your list conforms with mine. I certainly knew some weak F4 drivers.

Going back, V-Force plotters and copilot drawn from Canberras, no first tourists. Before that Canberras would have been tops, not sure about Meteor/Javelin. Eventually the Canberra was almost an advanced trainer in pecking order.
Pontius Navigator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.