Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

air to air radar question

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

air to air radar question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Apr 2015, 09:09
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1996
Location: Check with Ops
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stick it on the nose, see which way it drifts, pull like a bastard.

If only my lectures on the OHP had been so brief :-)
Pontius is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2015, 10:01
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside the Fence
Age: 71
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Pontius,

I thought that your lectures would have been on a chalk board!

The technique you mention sounds like the F4 force in the late 80s?
Dominator2 is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2015, 20:35
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pontius- IIRC basically the same method was in the F4 OCU line-book as an instructor-pilot's method for Air Combat Training- put 'em on the canopy centerline and pull like b*ggery.

Last edited by bike2lv; 10th Apr 2015 at 00:06. Reason: only one star in b*ggery
bike2lv is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2015, 04:54
  #24 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,403
Received 1,591 Likes on 728 Posts
Stick it on the nose, see which way it drifts, pull like a bastard.

If only my lectures on the OHP had been so brief :-)
Q: "what do you do with an engine fire in a Lightning?"

A: "Smash it to the edge and follow it round"*

*Note: Same answer for any question ref Lightning......

ps. One exception....

Q: "What do you with a Lightning with double engine failure?"
A: "Call Midland passing FL245...."
ORAC is online now  
Old 8th May 2015, 13:28
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fishpool

I read that the Lancaster crews used Fishpool during WW2 - though it was called Fishpond then!
Hosepipe is offline  
Old 8th May 2015, 15:17
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: S of 55N
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Convert everything into a 150, whether it's appropriate or not:

5deg off the nose at 40nm
3 at 30
cross ahead at 23
turn at 25 deg passed the nose at 9nm

Sun.
Sun Who is offline  
Old 8th May 2015, 15:23
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
With head sector missiles, I seem to remember being told the muggins approach was to assume everything was a 140.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 8th May 2015, 15:27
  #28 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,403
Received 1,591 Likes on 728 Posts
Convert everything into a 150, whether it's appropriate or not
Which is when we'd get a quiet telephone call from the ops desk asking for us to set up a few 150s crossing behind.

Oh the swearing when instead of curving in and crossing the nose, it suddenly whipped to the edge and disappeared.....
ORAC is online now  
Old 8th May 2015, 16:57
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
Fishpool
I read that the Lancaster crews used Fishpool during WW2 - though it was called Fishpond then!
Not just Lancasters but also Halifaxes, Stirling etc.

There's a tendency for all WW2 heavy bombers to become Lancasters, just as all V Bombers tend to become Vulcans!

That said, I didn't know it was called Fishpond - thanks.
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 9th May 2015, 08:58
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: On the Bay, Vic, Oz
Age: 80
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just as all V Bombers tend to become Vulcans!
And rightly so.
alisoncc is offline  
Old 9th May 2015, 09:52
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: S W France
Age: 80
Posts: 261
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
So which V could carry 35,000lbs (instead of only 21,000lbs) bombs, fly at transonic speeds and was still in squadron service in October 1993?

NOT the Vulcan!
Tengah Type is offline  
Old 9th May 2015, 10:29
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Africa
Age: 87
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not just Lancasters but also Halifaxes, Stirling etc.
Still in service on the Avro Lincoln's well after WWII.

At BCBS Lindholme until the Hastings took over. Circa 1960.
ian16th is offline  
Old 9th May 2015, 11:01
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Tengah Type
So which V could carry 35,000lbs (instead of only 21,000lbs) bombs, fly at transonic speeds and was still in squadron service in October 1993?

NOT the Vulcan!


An impressive load.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 9th May 2015, 12:34
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
As the actress said to the bishop.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 9th May 2015, 16:58
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, that looks like a Mk1, so the take-off roll must have been a loooooooooong one!
27mm is offline  
Old 9th May 2015, 17:02
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
It's not like a Mk 1, it is a Mk 1.

Long take off run indeed. I hate to think.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 9th May 2015, 19:51
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: S W France
Age: 80
Posts: 261
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Take off ground roll of a B1 at Butterworth, with 35,000lbs bombs, 8050ft. Runway lenghth 8000ft, so lots of lights broken. To prove the first crew got it wrong the Detco then did the same take off. All figures good from ODM - actual ground roll 8050ft, more new lights required!!

At Akrotiri in a K1, as No5 in a 30 second stream take off at dawn, with a gentle 2 kts headwind, ground roll 8950ft on a 9000ft runway. No lights broken but Safeland barrier damaged. Same pilot as second attempt at Butterworth, but now as a Wing Commander. Seems the air was heated by the precedeing aircraft, as each one in the stream took longer than the one before!! ATC pressed the crash button as they did not think No 5 would make it.

We used to offload fuel at Marham in the summer months, and it was usual to have a large gap, the wrong way, between Stop and Go Speeds at places like Masirah. Ah, those were the days!!
Tengah Type is offline  
Old 10th May 2015, 09:42
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
Wow, that looks like a Mk1, so the take-off roll must have been a loooooooooong one!
It usually was. On the principle of ignorance is bliss I was quite often glad I was sitting facing aft!

and it was usual to have a large gap, the wrong way, between Stop and Go Speeds at places like Masirah. Ah, those were the days!!
One of our crews had a late morning takeoff from Dubai. The co-pilot had never operated in the tropics before and calculated the fuel load using the tower OAT of 40C, not realising that out on the runway it was probably nearer 50C. The captain managed to drag it off just as the lights flashed under the wheels, and resolved to check the fuel calculations next time!
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 10th May 2015, 17:53
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recall a notice in the planning room at Gan:

'The captains of 4-jets are requested to line up at least 500 feet from the runway threshold to avoid damage to the approach lights on engine run-up'

Underneath a Victor tanker captain had scrawled 'I will write off the approach lights at one end or the other. Which would you prefer?'
soddim is offline  
Old 10th May 2015, 20:22
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: S W France
Age: 80
Posts: 261
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Victor K1 take off at Gan often saw the aircraft reach the end of the runway with the wheels still on the ground. As the aircraft ran off the end of the island the wheels drooped to the flight configuration kicking up rooster tails from the water. Gan is 6ft above sea level.

Take offs at Masirah also used a lot of (all) of the runway, so Nos 2 & 3 in the stream were IF in dust storms at Rotate. This with a severely reduced fuel load.
Ah the luxury of the Conways in the K2.

As TTN suggests facing aft saved quite a lot on the laundry bills.
Tengah Type is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.