Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Embraer KC-390 takes maiden flight

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Embraer KC-390 takes maiden flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Feb 2015, 15:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,375
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
Embraer KC-390 takes maiden flight

From Flight Global:-

The KC-390, Embraer’s clean-sheet aerial refueling tanker, flew for the first time on 3 February from an airfield in São José dos Campos, Brazil.

The KC-390’s 1h 25min flight consisted of manoeuvres to assess flight characteristics and system tests, including the aircraft’s fly-by-wire controls, Embraer says. "The KC -390 behaved in a docile and predictable manner," test pilot Mazort Louzada says in a statement. "The advanced system of fly- by-wire flight controls and the latest generation avionics facilitate piloting and provide smooth and accurate flight."

Embraer chief executive Frederico Fleury Curado says development of the KC-390 is “most likely the greatest technological challenge that the company has faced in its history”.
Later on in the article:-
First flight is an important milestone in the company’s flight test campaign, which must be completed in time to begin deliveries of the KC-390 to the Brazilian air force in 2016. The air force intends to buy 28 examples of the aircraft, which it collaborated with Embraer to develop. Another five nations have signed letters of intent to purchase a total 32 additional KC-390s.
I wonder how many they need to sell to stand a chance of breaking-even?
Lyneham Lad is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2015, 17:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
Neat looking bit of kit for smaller Air Forces ... but not completely convinced that it would have the reach for the Big boys.

I await intelligent input from those who know these things.
MPN11 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2015, 18:10
  #3 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It doesn't at first glance look like a tanker, but maybe other roles are possible hence widening its operational capability.

Are those Barbie-Jet windshields?

SGC
 
Old 3rd Feb 2015, 20:21
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Big boys?

Neat looking bit of kit for smaller Air Forces ... but not completely convinced that it would have the reach for the Big boys.
Which "Big boys"? Lots of Big Air Forces use the C-130 (including USAF and RAF) and the KC-390 has essentially the same payload and slightly greater range than a C-130. For those countries looking for a C-130 replacement or alternative, this could be just the ticket.
KenV is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2015, 20:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It doesn't at first glance look like a tanker, but maybe other roles are possible hence widening its operational capability.
Like the C-130 and A400M, the KC-390 is primarily a military transport that has a tanker capability. It is NOT a "tanker".
KenV is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2015, 06:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts



Note the hose-reel pods under the outer wings:

GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2015, 09:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect they'll sell quite a few
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2015, 10:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: ACT, Australia
Age: 63
Posts: 500
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Video of first flight.

Skeleton is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2015, 10:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,709
Received 38 Likes on 23 Posts
It's a bigger aircraft than it looks - those big cockpit windows make it look smaller
Davef68 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2015, 12:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,235
Received 51 Likes on 20 Posts
EMBRAER have sold a lot of RJs in recent years in the face of stiff competition and are doing well with the ERJ195 family against the mighty duopoly of Airbus and Boeing. I think this addition to the family is likely to go down very well, and I imagine it will be somewhat cheaper than a C-130J.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2015, 12:40
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
First flight is an important milestone in the company’s flight test campaign,

Wow!

Those are big windows. They make it look 146-sized when it is fully as big as a C-130. I think they'll do very well with it.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2015, 17:49
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,375
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
Given its size, payload etc, how do those experienced in such things consider its likely performance vis-a-vie competitors? The impression one gets visually is that it looks underpowered. Presumably the performance envelope has been carefully defined and that there was nobody in the design office from the Belslow team

From Wikipedia:-
Payload: 23.6 tons (52,029 lb)
Length: 33.91 m (111.3 ft)
Wingspan: 35.06 m (115 ft)
Height: 10.26 m (33.8 ft)
Loaded weight: 74.0 tons (163,142 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 81.0 tons (178,574 lb)
Powerplant: 2 × IAE V2500-E5 turbofan, 31,330 pounds-force (139.4 kN)[92] () each
Fuel capacity: 37.4 tons (74,800 lb, 33,929 kg)[14]
Lyneham Lad is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2015, 21:06
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given its size, payload etc, how do those experienced in such things consider its likely performance vis-a-vie competitors?
Performance wise, it clearly beats up on the venerable Herc. If it sells for a price under the J model (which seems likely) and Embraer can provide good worldwide support (which seems likely seeing as they've partnered with Boeing to provide support) Lockheed is going to have its hands full selling Js to replace all the A thru H Hercs that are reaching the end of their useful lives. Looks to me like Embraer has a winner on its hands.
KenV is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2015, 21:27
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Trumpville; On the edge
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KenV;
How can they have a winner on their hands when it doesn't even have eyebrow windows?
Trumpet_trousers is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2015, 23:04
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
Neat looking bit of kit for smaller Air Forces
Personally I think it's bloody ugly, although looks are very subjective. But then, after the Victor K1 you get a bit spoiled in the looks department
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2015, 14:01
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
? Why the silver tape on all the panel gaps?
boxmover is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2015, 14:53
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
...How can they have a winner on their hands when it doesn't even have eyebrow windows?


As long as they don't have to bank the thing for manoeuvring they be all reet.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2015, 21:39
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KenV;
How can they have a winner on their hands when it doesn't even have eyebrow windows?
Good question. Wish I had an answer. But interestingly, while this first aircraft does not include them, eyebrow windows are included in the majority of the drawings released by Embraer. Maybe this is a test aircraft and only production aircraft will include them. Who knows?
KenV is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2015, 22:31
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Poland
Posts: 38
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The aircraft looks... small on photos. Maybe because it bears similarities to Dornier 328JET (photo below) which I'm familiar with?


(photo by Juergen Lehle - AlbSpotter Flugzeugbilder Aircraft Photos)

The Dornier is 21.3m long whereas the KC-390 is 33.9m, substantially longer.
tupungato is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2015, 08:48
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ken

I don't think Embraer need to have Mr B hold their hands on world wide support - they already have facilities world wide for their commercial aircraft

Tho' I can see Mr B not being terribly upset that EMB might cut into Lockheed's order book
Heathrow Harry is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.