Embraer KC-390 takes maiden flight
Thread Starter
Embraer KC-390 takes maiden flight
From Flight Global:-
Later on in the article:-
I wonder how many they need to sell to stand a chance of breaking-even?
The KC-390, Embraer’s clean-sheet aerial refueling tanker, flew for the first time on 3 February from an airfield in São José dos Campos, Brazil.
The KC-390’s 1h 25min flight consisted of manoeuvres to assess flight characteristics and system tests, including the aircraft’s fly-by-wire controls, Embraer says. "The KC -390 behaved in a docile and predictable manner," test pilot Mazort Louzada says in a statement. "The advanced system of fly- by-wire flight controls and the latest generation avionics facilitate piloting and provide smooth and accurate flight."
Embraer chief executive Frederico Fleury Curado says development of the KC-390 is “most likely the greatest technological challenge that the company has faced in its history”.
The KC-390’s 1h 25min flight consisted of manoeuvres to assess flight characteristics and system tests, including the aircraft’s fly-by-wire controls, Embraer says. "The KC -390 behaved in a docile and predictable manner," test pilot Mazort Louzada says in a statement. "The advanced system of fly- by-wire flight controls and the latest generation avionics facilitate piloting and provide smooth and accurate flight."
Embraer chief executive Frederico Fleury Curado says development of the KC-390 is “most likely the greatest technological challenge that the company has faced in its history”.
First flight is an important milestone in the company’s flight test campaign, which must be completed in time to begin deliveries of the KC-390 to the Brazilian air force in 2016. The air force intends to buy 28 examples of the aircraft, which it collaborated with Embraer to develop. Another five nations have signed letters of intent to purchase a total 32 additional KC-390s.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes
on
64 Posts
Neat looking bit of kit for smaller Air Forces ... but not completely convinced that it would have the reach for the Big boys.
I await intelligent input from those who know these things.
I await intelligent input from those who know these things.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Big boys?
Neat looking bit of kit for smaller Air Forces ... but not completely convinced that it would have the reach for the Big boys.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It doesn't at first glance look like a tanker, but maybe other roles are possible hence widening its operational capability.
EMBRAER have sold a lot of RJs in recent years in the face of stiff competition and are doing well with the ERJ195 family against the mighty duopoly of Airbus and Boeing. I think this addition to the family is likely to go down very well, and I imagine it will be somewhat cheaper than a C-130J.
First flight is an important milestone in the company’s flight test campaign,
Wow!
Those are big windows. They make it look 146-sized when it is fully as big as a C-130. I think they'll do very well with it.
Wow!
Those are big windows. They make it look 146-sized when it is fully as big as a C-130. I think they'll do very well with it.
Thread Starter
Given its size, payload etc, how do those experienced in such things consider its likely performance vis-a-vie competitors? The impression one gets visually is that it looks underpowered. Presumably the performance envelope has been carefully defined and that there was nobody in the design office from the Belslow team
From Wikipedia:-
From Wikipedia:-
Payload: 23.6 tons (52,029 lb)
Length: 33.91 m (111.3 ft)
Wingspan: 35.06 m (115 ft)
Height: 10.26 m (33.8 ft)
Loaded weight: 74.0 tons (163,142 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 81.0 tons (178,574 lb)
Powerplant: 2 × IAE V2500-E5 turbofan, 31,330 pounds-force (139.4 kN)[92] () each
Fuel capacity: 37.4 tons (74,800 lb, 33,929 kg)[14]
Length: 33.91 m (111.3 ft)
Wingspan: 35.06 m (115 ft)
Height: 10.26 m (33.8 ft)
Loaded weight: 74.0 tons (163,142 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 81.0 tons (178,574 lb)
Powerplant: 2 × IAE V2500-E5 turbofan, 31,330 pounds-force (139.4 kN)[92] () each
Fuel capacity: 37.4 tons (74,800 lb, 33,929 kg)[14]
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Given its size, payload etc, how do those experienced in such things consider its likely performance vis-a-vie competitors?
Neat looking bit of kit for smaller Air Forces
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes
on
16 Posts
...How can they have a winner on their hands when it doesn't even have eyebrow windows?
As long as they don't have to bank the thing for manoeuvring they be all reet.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
KenV;
How can they have a winner on their hands when it doesn't even have eyebrow windows?
How can they have a winner on their hands when it doesn't even have eyebrow windows?
The aircraft looks... small on photos. Maybe because it bears similarities to Dornier 328JET (photo below) which I'm familiar with?
(photo by Juergen Lehle - AlbSpotter Flugzeugbilder Aircraft Photos)
The Dornier is 21.3m long whereas the KC-390 is 33.9m, substantially longer.
(photo by Juergen Lehle - AlbSpotter Flugzeugbilder Aircraft Photos)
The Dornier is 21.3m long whereas the KC-390 is 33.9m, substantially longer.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ken
I don't think Embraer need to have Mr B hold their hands on world wide support - they already have facilities world wide for their commercial aircraft
Tho' I can see Mr B not being terribly upset that EMB might cut into Lockheed's order book
I don't think Embraer need to have Mr B hold their hands on world wide support - they already have facilities world wide for their commercial aircraft
Tho' I can see Mr B not being terribly upset that EMB might cut into Lockheed's order book