Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Minimum flying hours to keep current

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Minimum flying hours to keep current

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Nov 2014, 17:25
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: europe
Age: 43
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Minimum flying hours to keep current

Gents, Ladies


Im doing a little research on minimum acceptable flying hours per year for military pilots. Understand NATO have a 150 hr recommendation for Fast jet types to keep operationally current. Would appreciate any info for maritime / transport types and also rotary.


PM's very welcome.
wotan is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 21:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Wotan, that is an excellent question. I'm not going to answer it - sorry. I was SO1 Training in 1Group/Air/Strike/etc and spent a long time reviewing that very subject. Sometimes my views on the subject didn't match funding/aircraft availability/strategic thinking/stuff I didn't understand/etc.

I'll tell you this. Pick whatever number you like, be it recommended by NATO or anyone else. There is no single figure. Examine the role, or roles, you want your pilot/crew to be proficient in (sorry for ending preposition) and then do a training analysis. Not a financial one, a real one. Then you shall have your answer.

There is no one-size-fits-all answer. Especially in this time of multi-role.

Maybe more to follow on the AD side - possibly the easiest aspect of it answer. Maybe.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 21:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,565
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
..and there is the difference between the minimum required for currency and what is required for competency. Flying the minimum for a month or so (so you are still allowed "solo") is one thing, but flying the minimum for a year or more really reduces effectiveness. My final (desk) job in the RAF required me to maintain "currency" but I would not have wanted to go to war again without a good refresher of intensive flying first.
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 21:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 564
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Yes, no size fits all.


But I always believed 18hrs a month would be an absolute minimum to cover the (typically) three roles a unit might cover.


18 x 11 months = 200 hrs pa.


Of course back in the day, we could crack 300-350.
BBadanov is online now  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 21:43
  #5 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my view currency is not about hours. I believe it is about how you spend your time while airborne and the number of sorties flown.

I started on the first P1127 in 1964 and it was not until 1982 that I managed to get 50 hours in any year on jumpjets.
John Farley is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 22:03
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Age: 30
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilots aside, does each airframe need to be airborne for a set number of hours each year to ascertain serviceability in the event that the aircraft needs to be deployed?
Typhoon93 is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 22:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Typhoon, no. Not really. Serviceability/availability/flying hours is a very different issue, although one that has a clear impact on the OP's question. Just watch this one and read the responses.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 22:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: S of 55N
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What Courtney said.

A better question is "What hours are necessary to remain competent? This is determined by what you need the crews to do and how good they need to be at it. The answer is frequently more expensive than budget holders are prepared to countenance.

Sun.
Sun Who is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 22:50
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: europe
Age: 43
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks chaps, aside from fast jet any ideas on average hours flown on transport / nimrod (sadly gone now) / 146,125 for peacetime ops pre Herrick Iraq etc. looking to get a comparison to our small Western Europe based air corps!

Thanks
wotan is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 23:11
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
What is your interest in this, Wotan?
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2014, 13:12
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...sound like he's doing your old job mate!
Chris Kebab is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2014, 16:19
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Either that or a paper for sdsr 15...
VinRouge is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2014, 16:23
  #13 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Don't forget that an aircraft type will usually have some type of 'Agreed Flying Rate" set during procurement upon which the training and maintenance plans will be based . Quite often the training branch will "adjust" the flying rate to meet a more immediate need (NVG as an example) only to find the aircraft and spares availability suddenly take a hit with the higher usage. Long-winded answer to say you can't just pluck a new flying rate out of thin air without considering the entire support strategy.
Two's in is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2014, 17:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
As has already been said, currency/competency isn't just about hours flown, it's what you do with those hours.

As one example (probably not the best one I'm afraid), I seem to remember someone saying on pprune a few years ago that the average co-pilot on Tristars at that time had only ever really flown into about 4 different airfields, Brize, Akrotiri and a couple in the Middle East. They might have lots of hours, but very little variety within those hours - therefore, the experience they were gaining was limited.
Biggus is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2014, 17:35
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: europe
Age: 43
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just really want wanted to compare what the norm was in other airforces. Our maritime guys are averaging about 250 a year which in my opinion is a little low. Rotary guys roughly the same.

Thanks for the info
wotan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.