A-6 intruder-thrust vectoring.
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: In the middle
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
''The jet already had a large and relatively thick ring, but the STOL requirement would require more innovation''
Is this some sort of naval aviation requirement.......?!
Is this some sort of naval aviation requirement.......?!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,236
Received 54 Likes
on
22 Posts
Very interesting.
I like some of the articles on this guy's site, and at the risk of going off topic it's hard to disagree with him when he suggests that aircraft such as subsonic A-6s and A-7s would have been far more useful over Iraq and Afghanistan than faster pointy nosed jets.
Mind, with the latest scheme to retire the A-10 the USAF don't seem to agree...
I like some of the articles on this guy's site, and at the risk of going off topic it's hard to disagree with him when he suggests that aircraft such as subsonic A-6s and A-7s would have been far more useful over Iraq and Afghanistan than faster pointy nosed jets.
Mind, with the latest scheme to retire the A-10 the USAF don't seem to agree...
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 45
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aircraft like the A-6 and A-7 would be more use as bomb trucks in Iraq and Afganistan but they have one issue that a pointy jet such as the Hornet and Super Hornet that do their job today, they can't defend themselves. A pointy jet can drop bombs and fly as a fighter, it may not carry bombs as well a bomb truck but the bomb truck can't act as a fighter. With limited money to buy aircraft you might aswell just by fighters and live with the compromise.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chasing Dreams
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting article, not a fan of the line
"...and was certainly a forerunner of things to come with the famous Harrier Jump Jet years later, an aircraft that used rotating nozzles with fantastic results. "
The P.1127 first flew in Mid 1960, roughly the same time as the YA2 did.
Would be interested to know the effect of the vectored thrust on a CAT launch.
"...and was certainly a forerunner of things to come with the famous Harrier Jump Jet years later, an aircraft that used rotating nozzles with fantastic results. "
The P.1127 first flew in Mid 1960, roughly the same time as the YA2 did.
Would be interested to know the effect of the vectored thrust on a CAT launch.
Thread Starter
Neither can the A-10 and that did the job OK.
The thought of not a pound for air to ground is largely history.
Last edited by West Coast; 7th Jul 2014 at 16:44.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holly Beach, Louisiana
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some good discussion about the A-7F, A-10, and F-16 and how they all came to be or not be what they are today?
Can We Learn Something From The Defunct A-7F "Strikefighter?"
Can We Learn Something From The Defunct A-7F "Strikefighter?"
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 45
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any fighter pilot worthy of that title will just sit back and take BVR shots at strike aircraft. If he gets in close enough for an A-10 to use it's gun then he is an idiot. Same deal with the AIM-9
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 45
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rubbish. Fighter pilot 101: fight to your advantages not the enemy's. Any fighter pilot that deliberately goes into a dogfight when he can avoid it and shot the enemy at long range with no danger to himself is reckless and stupid. (Barring any restrictive rules of engagement or other restriction on firing BVR missiles).
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Eight manufacturers submitted eleven proposals to meet specification CA-10504 issued on 2 Oct 1956, which included a Marine Corp requirement for STOL operations from unimproved airstrips. The requirement called for a 1,500 foot take off over a 50 foot obstacle. Lift off speed with nozzles deflected was 78 to 86 knots for a lightweight aircraft.
Test pilot Bob Smyth cites - The tail pipes normally bent down 7° with respect to the fuselage reference line, but to satisfy the Marine Corp STOL requirement a hydraulic actuator, controlled by a knurled knob on the outboard throttle, could deflect the nozzles down to 30° (23° of travel). There was no trim change, and they reduced the stall speed by five knots, or for a given approach speed they reduced the angle of attack by 3°. Only the first seven aircraft were so fitted, as they were found to be only marginally effective in meeting the Marine Corp requirement. Actually, the concept would have worked well on the heavyweight EA-6B.
"Intruder - The Operational History of Grumman's A-6", Mark & Rick Morgan
Test pilot Bob Smyth cites - The tail pipes normally bent down 7° with respect to the fuselage reference line, but to satisfy the Marine Corp STOL requirement a hydraulic actuator, controlled by a knurled knob on the outboard throttle, could deflect the nozzles down to 30° (23° of travel). There was no trim change, and they reduced the stall speed by five knots, or for a given approach speed they reduced the angle of attack by 3°. Only the first seven aircraft were so fitted, as they were found to be only marginally effective in meeting the Marine Corp requirement. Actually, the concept would have worked well on the heavyweight EA-6B.
"Intruder - The Operational History of Grumman's A-6", Mark & Rick Morgan
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The A-6 was cleared for (and did on occasion in Vietnam) carry (and fire) the 20mm external gun pod.
Hey, if it's good enough for F-4s, its good enough for the "Sky Pig"!
And West Coast - the A-6 was more maneuverable than you think.
No, it couldn't keep with the A-10 through rolls & turns, but it was more maneuverable than the F-4s that didn't have the maneuvering slats - and no one says the Phantom II couldn't do air-air!
Hey, if it's good enough for F-4s, its good enough for the "Sky Pig"!
And West Coast - the A-6 was more maneuverable than you think.
No, it couldn't keep with the A-10 through rolls & turns, but it was more maneuverable than the F-4s that didn't have the maneuvering slats - and no one says the Phantom II couldn't do air-air!