Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

AF plane almost hit by a Russian Bomber..?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

AF plane almost hit by a Russian Bomber..?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Apr 2014, 03:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern Shores of Lusitania Kingdom
Age: 53
Posts: 858
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Question AF plane almost hit by a Russian Bomber..?

Sounds interesting...
Russischer Jagdbomber kommt extrem nah: Air-France-Maschine entgeht knapp Kollision - n-tv.de
Any other info??
JanetFlight is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2014, 04:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Albuquerque USA
Posts: 174
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Moscow times says Tu-95

The details seem similar enough to likely be the same incident, but this Moscow Times description specifies the bomber as Tu-95, not Tu-22M3.
archae86 is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2014, 07:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
French TV carried the same report yesterday, have not seen anything more official.
wiggy is online now  
Old 12th Apr 2014, 07:36
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Official position is on the RosAviatsia website (FAA analogue in Russia).

They said that there was enough separation between those two planes -- 300 m was the vertical separation, whereas horizontal was 1km.

http://www.favt.ru/favt_new/?q=novos...ti/novost/3859
Sunamer is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2014, 09:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The TU-22 is a very big aircraft, wingspan 77 ft, but to the non-cognoscenti similar in shape to something like a F-111 with a 32 ft wingspan. So it would appear as if it was a LOT closer. In the early days of the B747 there were similar repeated claims of NMAC by pilots of other aircraft who did not realize how big 747s were.
Ian W is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2014, 09:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: CE
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was only 100m separation according to the German report (300 being the required minimum) and the Air France crew reported hearing the engines of the Tup.
DevX is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2014, 11:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DevX
It was only 100m separation according to the German report (300 being the required minimum) and the Air France crew reported hearing the engines of the Tup.

I think the separation was probably 300m with the crew thinking they were looking at a smaller quieter aircraft much closer.


Many years ago, in North Wales low flying area (go to youtube and search on Mach Loop) which was even more well used than it is now, Valley used to operate Gnats and Hunters. The locals were used to seeing these aircraft in the Snowdonia valleys and largely ignored them. A detachment of F-5s did a couple of weeks of low flying from Valley and there was a storm of low flying complaints with people misidenting the F-5s at correct height as very low Gnats. They were not that good at aircraft recognition but thought they could judge height.
Ian W is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2014, 12:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: gashbag
Age: 53
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can hear the engines of a TU-22 from 3km away, 300 meters is no problem!
PURPLE PITOT is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2014, 13:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ankh Morpork, DW
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tu-22 and Tu-22M3 are completely very aircraft, FYI.
ImbracableCrunk is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2014, 15:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: on the ground
Posts: 445
Received 32 Likes on 11 Posts
The TU22 and TU22M are only loosely related but are of very similar size.

This photo from wikipedia of a Phantom and two TU22s reinforces the point that they might easily be mistaken for a much closer, smaller aircraft of similar shape:

nonsense is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2014, 15:27
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This one is big.... those are far away..
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2014, 16:04
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and you can hear a TU-95 50 knms away.................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2014, 17:40
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many years ago - an aircraft under radar control with one of our sectors reported an 'air miss' with an Argosy. The controller said "I thought you said you were IMC?" to which the response was "I didn't see it, I recognized the engine noise"
Ian W is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2014, 01:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Counter Rotating Props on the TU-95 do make a very unique, loud, low frequency rumble. Can easily be heard, and felt at even 300m.

Given todays world I'd wager the old Badger was sending France a message at 100m. Jusy MO.
Nieuport28 is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2014, 13:26
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Given todays world I'd wager the old Badger was sending France a message at 100m.
Badger = two-syllable Nato reporting name starting with B = jet bomber

Bear = one-syllable Nato reporting name starting with B = (turbo-)prop bomber

Good luck spotting a Badger flying anywhere outside of China.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2014, 14:15
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: CE
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There seems to be a lot of confusion about because the original report cites it as a TU-22M3 (Backfire).
Isn't anything straight forward these days?
DevX is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2014, 14:19
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not when it comes to journalists who don't check facts and work on the principle of "any photo will do as long as it looks good"
500N is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2014, 16:32
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Except when this thread was first posted, since I can't read Russian I googled the title and came up with more than a few articles in English, most dated before the Russian one at the top of the page.

All of which clearly said TU-95 Bomber and a couple said they could hear the engines.


Even this link posted in the 3rd post on this thread is dated 11th April,
3 days before the link in the OP post.

??????????
500N is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2014, 16:58
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: france
Age: 62
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
French media said that the AF pilots reported they had heard "the noise of the propellers" of the russian aircraft. For what it's worth...
Charles. is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2014, 17:00
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, I read that when I first googled the English versions but can't find it now.
500N is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.