Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Effects of tailwind

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Effects of tailwind

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Mar 2014, 01:25
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Effects of tailwind

Hi guys,

I seem to remember in the dim and distant past being shown an American video demonstrating the effects of various wind conditions on takeoff and landing, possibly using a B707. I think the video may have been initially made from NASA experiments-it was pretty old. However, it would be perfect to use during a lesson I'm preparing. I've looked online and can't find it anywhere. Does anyone have a copy they could point me to or a link to it?

Many thanks for any help offered.
FJ2ME is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 07:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oxford
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Delta Air Lines Flight 191 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The NTSB attributed the accident to lack of the ability to detect microbursts aboard aircraft – the radar equipment aboard aircraft at the time was unable to detect wind changes, only thunderstorms. After the investigation, NASA researchers at Langley Research Center modified a Boeing 737-200 as a testbed for an on-board Doppler weather radar. The resultant airborne wind shear detection and alert system was installed on many commercial airliners in the United States after the FAA mandated that all commercial aircraft must have on-board windshear detection systems.[4]
Was it developed after this accident as above - may be easier to source the video?
lj101 is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2014, 00:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its not the one you were looking for, but here is a vid of 3 high-crosswind landings by B777s (Boeing test flights, not in-service):

There are links to lots more vids there.
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2014, 01:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm struggling to see just what those crosswind testing videos, nice as they are, have anything to do with the OP's thread
glad rag is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2014, 09:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's all part of life's rich pageantry, g-r.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2014, 10:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,058
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
GreenKnight - That's steady old stuff - takes ba**s of steel. ISTR it was done at Moses Lake. BTW the Speckled Trout was allegedly capable of autoland with 38kts across.

glad rag - you're quite right - we should get back to the thread. More discipline required here.

FJ2ME - for clarification - are you talking about routine runway performance calculations, or about aircraft behaviour close to the ground in abnormal situations such as windshear/downburst etc ?

LFH
Lordflasheart is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2014, 11:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East Sussex
Age: 86
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Remember doing wet Xwind trials with short landings at BD prior to the Nimrods going down to Stanley after we had kicked their a--es. The max Xwind we tried was 40kts and, using the wing down technique, it was not a problem. The test plan required the final landing to be stopped using max anti skid. Interestingly, this caused all the upwind tyres on both bogies to burst. It was quite exciting. It was concluded that this was because the Xwind component was causing the undercarriage legs to slightly "lean over" which, effectively, gave the upwind wheels less purchase on the runway. It was the only time I have heard multiple tyre bursts. It was nice to have had a cast iron excuse!
pontifex is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2014, 20:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,838
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
Still off topic, but on crosswind landings. I used to be a member of the Crusaders Gliding Club in Cyprus back in the early 80s. Due to the sea breeze we generally operated with a fairly stiff 45-90 deg crosswind. Not a problem, we were used to it.

We had the gliding members of more than one APC Sqn turn up(and try and take the place over!) and declare the conditions too dangerous to fly in.
MightyGem is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2014, 00:51
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks guys for the replies. I seem to remember that it was shown to us in some sort of performance Groundschool, to visually hammer home the effect of tailwind on takeoff and landing distances required. It may have been as a result I that Delta incident above but I thought it pre-dated that...

So more performance planning than dealing with an unexpected weather change.

And I'm all good for exciting crosswind videos thanks 👍
FJ2ME is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2014, 01:01
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was quite exciting. It was concluded that this was because the Xwind component was causing the undercarriage legs to slightly "lean over"
Surely it would have been the into wind aileron I assume you were applying that would have caused the extra pumpy bit on the into wind tyres?

Reminds me of the General's son who was an RFC recruit during the Great War. He pranged during training and the enquiry concluded that 'there was insufficient lift in the air'.
thing is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.