Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Military 'may have to abandon flood-prone bases'

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Military 'may have to abandon flood-prone bases'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 12:50
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 30 Miles from the A1
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
(off topic) Willard - I find if I clear the cookies I get another 10
2Planks is online now  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 13:34
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Met Office told councils to expect a 'drier than normal' Winter - Telegraph


Someone in Government has missed a trick - have not heard them blame the Met Office yet for not warning them
Wander00 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 14:40
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,274
Received 674 Likes on 241 Posts
QUOTE: BINBROOK!!! The rain passes over Binbrook horizontal on route to Brize.

a geography and/ or meteorology refresher is recommended.

or Binbrook isn't where I left it, or Brize come to that!

As an ex-Metman of great wisdom and experience, I can divulge that long-range forecasts are useless, always have been, and always will be. The Office has been struggling, totally unsuccessfully, to produce them ever since I courted Mrs LB 55 years ago: she was in the "laboratory" [Met O 12] that was tasked solely with providing just such forecasts. Meanwhile I was next door in Met O 11 running the Ferranti Mercury Mainframe engaged in producing useful short-range stuff that was and still is the world leader.

I shudder to think how much time, energy and money has been spent on the chimera of long range forecasts.

They cannot really stop my pension, can they?
langleybaston is online now  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 15:23
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are geese really stupid enough to hit buildings now? If not, then a modest change in temperature won't make any difference. Then again, given some of the procurement going on, I would think a few solid geese slaps to the head are long overdue at the MoD anyway.

The Navy's docks will need to stay ocean-proximate. If the ocean goes up a bit, then that's just life…
awblain is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 15:31
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,946
Received 2,853 Likes on 1,221 Posts
Base hangar with its underfloor heating will make a damn good sauna
NutLoose is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 16:11
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location!
Posts: 2,302
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
I can't see anything detrimental about a Navy base going under water!

Especially Devonport, which is after all a submarine base ....

Jack
Union Jack is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 16:19
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,946
Received 2,853 Likes on 1,221 Posts
Be nice to see the Victory floating again.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 16:26
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Good job we got rid of Lyneham

Trouble with high airfields is they are in cloud all day!
Background Noise is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 16:32
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: raf
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAF Sealand went up and down with the tide!!
So does Bae Warton. The ground moves by one or two millimetres.

Where Warton bolts together sections of Typhoon, they have such a close tolerance that the shop floor moves on computer automated jacks and fricken laser beams compensate for the daily up and down motion.

http://www.baesystems.com/article/BA...3D100ivb3byl_4
gr4techie is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 17:59
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Well Kinloss used to have a small geese problem; don't ever remember any of them flying into any buildings though!!
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 18:16
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Base hangar with its underfloor heating will make a damn good sauna
What would be required to turn it into a Jacuzzi ?
racedo is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 19:25
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,946
Received 2,853 Likes on 1,221 Posts
Probably weld up the doors, then run a Voyager's bleed air off through some hoses, must be tons lying about as they're not doing a lot these days
NutLoose is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 19:46
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where Warton bolts together sections of Typhoon, they have such a close tolerance that the shop floor moves on computer automated jacks and fricken l@ser beams compensate for the daily up and down motion.
Sheer PR brilliance. "Our factory's falling to bits" is mysteriously translated to "blah, laser beams on sharks, blah, blah, high tech blah…."

It matters not what is the absolute position of the two bits to be stuck together, but their relative position. The claimed "matchstick distance off correct" is still quite a lot for a Typhoon, and way more than 2mm in the radius of the Earth.
awblain is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 20:46
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: raf
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awblain... Still, the tolerance of the Typhoon is much better than Hawker Siddeley ever managed with all the different shapes and sizes of Nimrod.
gr4techie is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 20:54
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,946
Received 2,853 Likes on 1,221 Posts
Anything under an inch would be better then.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 21:26
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: People's Republic
Age: 68
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone remember Ploce?
big v is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 22:17
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Telegraph is an utterly bollocks paper.

True. I read it this morning, thankful that I never actually bought the thing. Very little worth reading in it except Clive James and I am increasingly confused as to its target audience. Ex-Public schoolboys and girls, mostly I guess.*






* not a pop at this particular tribe, just seems to be all about them, all the time.
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2014, 22:54
  #38 (permalink)  
Danny42C
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(Ref: #10) Quote:

"Who gives a rat's arse about Canada Geese hitting buildings? What makes Abbeywood's buildings more likely to be hit than any other 3 storey buildings in and around Bristol (or the rest of the country). Canada Geese aren't flying into buildings on a regular basis at other locations where they already flock - unless of course all the ones at Abbeywood are blind!"

Or under Air Traffic Control ?

(Couldn't resist - sorry !)
 
Old 23rd Feb 2014, 02:37
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Canada
Age: 77
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Roland- if Kinloss had a 'small' goose problem, perhaps they were Lesser Canada Geese, possibly a more situationally-aware variety.
N2erk is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2014, 05:31
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I did a quick Google and can find one reference to Canada Geese flying into a building and that is the Sands Apartment building in Scarborough, Yorkshire.

And not the whole building, just one end that was painted a very light grey
and blended perfectly with the skyline as the geese flew out to sea.
500N is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.