Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

War with Russia next?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

War with Russia next?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Feb 2014, 17:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
War with Russia next?

What the hell is Anders Fogh Rasmussen doing joining in with the war of words over Ukraine? I have never felt very happy with his political propaganda, as Secretary General of NATO he is NOT in political control!

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 09:23
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No more comments from NATO?

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 09:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southend
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just two words Stay Out!
Bill4a is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 09:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,025
Received 2,902 Likes on 1,243 Posts
Probably something to do with the agreements we all signed up to.

I don't think the UK Plc would want to get involved, after all, we are already struggling with the Polish, Rumanian, Slovakian, Lithuania, Croatian, Czech, immigrants, where would we put several million Russian prisoners of war?

As said I think keeping out of it would be prudent, World War 2 more or less resulted from countries annexing others.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 09:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Sunny
Posts: 1,601
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
NATO, first and foremost, is a political organisation, with a Military wing. It's easy for us military types to get it the other way around.
Whenurhappy is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 10:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Perth Western Australia
Age: 57
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Putin doesn't want a war, he's only doing what he is because he knows we in the west like the good life, and won't want to risk a real fight, another words where spineless.

He will get what he wants there, then in several years another, all the time we will just tuck our tail between our legs.

He like every other bully is a coward, when some one who can fight back stands up to him,he will back down. Its all well and good prancing around with your fancy hardware and high standards, but sooner or later you need to be prepared to get your hands dirty and the potential of a great loss.

if you don't you will have it forced on you one way or another.
rh200 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 10:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The West is all mouth and no trousers.

There's nothing the West can do, or will do, and Putin knows it.

He'll take Crimea in the next couple of months, preferably via a puppet Government (which is what he tried with Yanakovich and the whole of Ukraine anyway)

Troops will be used, but no significant fighting will occur.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 10:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West of Suez
Posts: 336
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"NATO, first and foremost, is a political organisation, with a Military wing. It's easy for us military types to get it the other way around."


I recall a time when it was a defensive alliance.
AnglianAV8R is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 10:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SWAPS Inner
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is interesting to hear the politicians weasling their words over this issue as we enter our year of commemorations for the start of WWI. After all, one of the reasons we entered was to guarantee Belgian neutrality, or WW2, Polish neutrality. The EU, perhaps in its eagerness to dismantle the Soviet Union, guaranteed Ukrainian 'independence' in 1994. Now, call me a cynic, or is it just because the chickens are coming home to roost, they are trying to say "oh, well, umm, of course, that wasn't legally binding or a real promise..."

Now, I have absolutely no interest in diving into another stupid 'intervention' or war with another country but isn't this yet another example of politicians promising the earth without fully appreciating the implications of what they are saying? And of politicians refusing to stand up and be counted when the time comes...
thunderbird7 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 11:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: raf
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't worry, we couldn't afford to have one.

I reckon in the future, wars will be decided by who runs out of money first.
gr4techie is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 11:19
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Usually have been !
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 12:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: A place in the sun
Age: 82
Posts: 1,269
Received 48 Likes on 19 Posts
Why not just partition the country and get on with it. It is not worth going to war over it.
Bergerie1 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 12:15
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,025
Received 2,902 Likes on 1,243 Posts
Well if that's the plan, just as well Top Gear already did the economical vehicle programme.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 12:38
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Putin: Kremlin heeding Crimea leader's call for help - latimes.com
Ronald Reagan is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 13:36
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So, does anyone think Anders Fogh Rasmussen could declare war on Russia on behalf of all NATO and we would have to be in breach of our obligations not to comply?

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 13:53
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Posts: 1,185
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
No, Ukraine is not a member of NATO!

Therefore, nothing to do with us. Of course, the Politicians are probably bricking it now. What happened to the Peace Dividend? Now we've cut our forces and have no money to re-arm and a massive welfare state to look after; not to mention Foreign Aid etc etc.

It seems the Russians can now afford to mount a Cold War II..
Out Of Trim is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 14:22
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 119K East of SARDOT
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Although the The Budapest Memorandum is binding (by law), there is no mechanism to enforce it? This is the dilemma the West is facing - you have to sense this situation has the potential to trigger that 3am phone call?
Sand4Gold is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 14:35
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Sunny
Posts: 1,601
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
No, NATO Sec Gen cannot declare war, per se. It has to be by consensus of the North Atlantic Council - ie PERMREPS from the 28 nations. That's not the same as unanimous, by the way. Member states can agree not to 'break silence' and then not participate in the action - as Germany did with the Libya conflict.

If my state is in Central or Eastern Europe, I would be very, very worried about Russian intentions. At what point is Putin stopped? I know that the Baltic States have urged Art IV measures (urgent consultations) of the NAC but in reality a lead nation would have to take over the military planning and execution given the rapidity of events, as NATO has publically declared for some time that it does not have conventional war plans relating to Russia and it would take time to develop plans, produce and populate a CJSOR and then deploy. The NRF, unfortunately, is not really configured for what would be a conventional force-on-force conflict.
Whenurhappy is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 15:05
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure Mr Putin would point out that it's not Russia expanding but the west getting closer to his front door

I'm not surprised he's worried - especially when a good piece of his navy is down there.......
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 15:28
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Russia has always wanted a buffer and, as you say, "we" are getting closer.................And it is not always just "territory", but "spheres of influence"

Last edited by Wander00; 1st Mar 2014 at 15:29. Reason: short term memory not what it was
Wander00 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.