DHFS TO YEOVILTON?
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes
on
64 Posts
All the more reason to close Shawbs then MPN11 - think of the recently-retired SOs whose new employers will make a bundle from the contracts awarded
However, is there anywhere left with such a huge 3-storey Officers Mess? I know the RAF has shrunk to a pinpoint, but there's another bit of infrastructure in the equation as well
I do, honestly, speak not from emotion for my alma mater but simply from the viewpoint that Shawbury has a lot more going for it than just a bunch of buzzing flies
Thread Starter
Much as I hate to say it, CATCS could easily be moved to Boulmer to become an 'ABM' school however, AMSU (aircraft storage) still seems to be utilised and the Fields and Clearings around Shawbury would take some time to build elsewhere although I know they have them around Salisbury Plain and Yeovilton. One other reason Shawbury has no other military airfield nearby and has been heavily utilised by Valley and others.
Gentleman Aviator
However, is there anywhere left with such a huge 3-storey Officers Mess?
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DHFS - Shawbury - CATCS - SABM
Perhaps we should all cast our minds back to when the original proposal to create DHFS was staffed. I seem to remember that all three services were invited to submit their proposals for the location on the understanding that the two units not selected would close. Shawbury was selected as the most suitable base for DHFS and yet unsurprisingly neither Culdrose nor Middle Wallop have actually closed. Given the considerable investment in infrastructure, equipment and personnel necessary for a DHFS operation to take place elsewhere, along with a dedicated LFA, I very much doubt a new DHFS contractor would consider moving the operation elsewhere, as currently there is no compelling reason to do so.
I suppose it was only a matter of time before someone from Boulmer tried to turn the discussion over to where a combined CATCS / SABM should be located and rather predictably try to make a case for Boulmer.
I seem to recall that it wasn’t that long ago that Boulmer was scheduled to close and now that the SAR element will be closing down completely in the near future, the argument for closure or some form of draw down at Boulmer becomes even more compelling.
Moving SABM away from Boulmer and finally bringing their Phase Two training within the Training Group by locating a combined school at Shawbury, would make a lot of sense and is certainly a better argument than for locating a combined school at Boulmer. In the interim, whilst no money for a combined school is available, both CATCS and SABM currently have the appropriate facilities at the present locations and so are unlikely to move any time soon. Nevertheless, given the future size of the RAF and the planned amalgamation of the specialisations, a combined school makes sound economic sense and in the long-term I suspect Shawbury will end up being the preferred location.
MATOman
I suppose it was only a matter of time before someone from Boulmer tried to turn the discussion over to where a combined CATCS / SABM should be located and rather predictably try to make a case for Boulmer.
I seem to recall that it wasn’t that long ago that Boulmer was scheduled to close and now that the SAR element will be closing down completely in the near future, the argument for closure or some form of draw down at Boulmer becomes even more compelling.
Moving SABM away from Boulmer and finally bringing their Phase Two training within the Training Group by locating a combined school at Shawbury, would make a lot of sense and is certainly a better argument than for locating a combined school at Boulmer. In the interim, whilst no money for a combined school is available, both CATCS and SABM currently have the appropriate facilities at the present locations and so are unlikely to move any time soon. Nevertheless, given the future size of the RAF and the planned amalgamation of the specialisations, a combined school makes sound economic sense and in the long-term I suspect Shawbury will end up being the preferred location.
MATOman
now that the SAR element will be closing down completely in the near future, the argument for closure or some form of draw down at Boulmer becomes even more compelling.
Whether Boulmer survives a master plan to combine ABM/ATC trg is another matter...
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes
on
64 Posts
Thank you, unknown former colleague 
Moving SABM away from Boulmer and finally bringing their Phase Two training within the Training Group by locating a combined school at Shawbury, would make a lot of sense and is certainly a better argument than for locating a combined school at Boulmer. In the interim, whilst no money for a combined school is available, both CATCS and SABM currently have the appropriate facilities at the present locations and so are unlikely to move any time soon. Nevertheless, given the future size of the RAF and the planned amalgamation of the specialisations, a combined school makes sound economic sense and in the long-term I suspect Shawbury will end up being the preferred location.
MATOman
MATOman
