Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

UK Maritime Patrol Aircraft - An Urgent Requirement

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

UK Maritime Patrol Aircraft - An Urgent Requirement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Nov 2014, 20:50
  #821 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Outside the Matz
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You have to listen to DCs speach today. I almost choked when he declared that we can no longer expect allied aircraft to protect our nation.

Blue Nun going on ice!

Last edited by Bannock; 10th Nov 2014 at 21:14.
Bannock is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2014, 07:33
  #822 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 657
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Bannock - you can't leave it at that mate - spill the beans!!

What speech, when, where, why, context, etc.....

Copy of the text??
Party Animal is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2014, 07:43
  #823 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is a text of the speech DC made on 10 Nov

PM speech: Lord Mayor's Banquet 2014 | PoliticsHome | Press Release | PoliticsHome

I think Bannock's point is well out of context...but that's just IMO
The Old Fat One is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2014, 08:22
  #824 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Outside the Matz
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of context, you're probably right, but the irony of that sentance was worthy of comment.

That's news editors for you. Just airing the juicy bits.
Bannock is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2014, 11:49
  #825 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Llandudno
Age: 100
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
U.K.Maritime Patrol Aircraft An Urgent Requirement

I know that I am going back a "few" years, but does anybody remember, Lindhome Drop and find the nearest ship or is that in the realms of fantasy in this "modern" world.

Last edited by Ormeside28; 11th Nov 2014 at 18:34.
Ormeside28 is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2014, 14:48
  #826 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,709
Received 38 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Bannock
You have to listen to DCs speach today. I almost choked when he declared that we can no longer expect allied aircraft to protect our nation.

He did caveat that with 'entirely'
Davef68 is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2014, 19:43
  #827 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Usually just lurk here but couldn't resist...

... drawing your attention to this -

BBC: "UK called on NATO help in sub search"

BBC News - UK called on Nato help in sub search

Sigh.
tbwtg is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2014, 01:25
  #828 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also here: Canadians, French, U.S. Hunt For Submarine Off Scotland | Defense content from Aviation Week
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2014, 08:23
  #829 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,709
Received 38 Likes on 23 Posts
Which was the plan they announced in 2010. Has it happened before? My memroy says it has, at least once, but with much less publicity.

One would almost think that a Defence Review was due and we needed to show a threat/capability gap....
Davef68 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2014, 16:31
  #830 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
While I realize that what politicians say before they are elected and what they actually do after they are elected are very different things, reading

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30417955

implies that if Labour are in power/coalition post 2015 then every government department except the NHS (and you can expect Education to eventually be added) will face budget cuts year on year until the annual deficit is reduced.

All parties are falling over themselves to state how they will reduce the deficit, against this background I can't see how SDSR 2015 will be anything other than another capability, for which read cost, cutting exercise.

Funding for new assets (such as MPA/MMA) is likely only to be feasible if something else is given up. Depressing times for the military as asset after asset, base after base and capability after capability disappears.

Oh, government sector workers can also expect minimal pay rises for years to come, which the government of the day will justify on the basis that inflation is currently only 1.2%.
Biggus is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2014, 18:21
  #831 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In context, what DC said was


"The international operation is about protecting our people, our economy and our way of life - and we have a fundamental duty to take part.

It would be completely wrong to think we could entirely sub-contract the task of protecting the streets of Britain to the air forces of our allies.

And to do so would not just place our national security in the hands of others,

it would endanger our economic security too."


That seems to argue for credible UK armed forces
Wander00 is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2014, 14:44
  #832 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you'll find the critical word in that statement is "entirely"....
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2015, 14:17
  #833 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Outside the Matz
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cat - Pigeons........ Go !

Exclusive - Japan seeks to sell sub-hunting jet to UK as Abe pushes arms exports | Reuters
Bannock is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2015, 14:52
  #834 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: home for good
Posts: 494
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
baggsy popping over to Atsugi NAS (guess that is where they will be based?) to collect it. Need to go back there to fill in the blanks from the last visit (remember that one TT? - I suspect not!!)
On a serious note - if we had the money to buy them (which I don't feel we do), wouldn't we buy the P8 (maybe on C17 style lease/buy deal to match the costs for the P1)? Good to speculate but I feel this is a PR stunt to distract the Japanese public from their economic woes..
Sandy Parts is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2015, 16:48
  #835 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Could add a bit of competition to the process, although I'd like to see CF34s on it from the operating cost and support perspective. It's also nice to have four engines and not carry the scar weight from the USN wanting to carry the AAS and external SLAM-ERs. However, the price is likely to be a bit scary.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2015, 17:45
  #836 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's also nice to have four engines and not carry the scar weight from the USN wanting to carry the AAS and external SLAM-ERs. However, the price is likely to be a bit scary.
Having four engines carries a price premium. Kawsaki P-1 costs $170M. Beoing P-8 costs $150M.

The standard P-8 does not include structure to accomodate the AAS. That structure is added on later after the aircraft is delivered to the Navy.
KenV is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2015, 18:43
  #837 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In the Radio Bay
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lindholme gear

I saw Lindholme dropped in about 1992. We were called out in our Wessex SAR cab from Valley to a sunken trawler off the IoM. It had put out a mayday an hour before dawn and gone silent. The coastguard had fishing boats, us, a ferry all track searching from Douglas to Whitehaven. Sadly the coasties had applied the tide drift in the wrong direction, but the Nimrod went off on a private foray and found the survivors in the water sans dinghy. They dropped the Lindholme within 20 ft of them, and orbited until we showed up. Brilliant bit of work by the kipper boys, I wrote and told their boss.
DunWinching is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2015, 21:02
  #838 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good to speculate but I feel this is a PR stunt to distract the Japanese public from their economic woes..
Not in a million years. The Japanese simply do think like that. For starters, the vast majority of Japanese know next to zilch about their "self-defense forces". I lectured a bunch of Japanese students in 1996 and when I pointed out they had the second highest absolute dollar spend on military hardware in the world (behind the US) they all looked at me like I was totally nuts. (PS...it was probably third, behind China, but no one really knows what they blow).
The Old Fat One is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2015, 21:30
  #839 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
$170M v $150M
Got any evidence for those figures? Do they include support, training systems, spares? Reports I've seen suggest that a P-1 is about 2/3rds the cost of a P-8.
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2015, 11:02
  #840 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Devon
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MPA and Japan

Can remember taking a Nimrod Mr1 to the Tokyo airshow in 1973 when BAe were trying to sell the Nimrod to the Japanese.
middlesbrough is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.