Ascent UK MFTS
Except that, in this situation, the frustration / delay hasn't been due to any 'fault' of the RAF......
Just the plank who thought that MFTS was A Great Idea.
How many other air forces farm out their core military training to civilian companies?
Just the plank who thought that MFTS was A Great Idea.
How many other air forces farm out their core military training to civilian companies?
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How many other air forces farm out their core military training to civilian companies?
MFTS in principle is not a bad thing as a concept...the execution is perhaps demonstrably a little off at the moment but there are probably some hefty mitigating factors?!
The setup in terms of infrastructure (ac/real-estate/IT support/sims) should mean that this system is world beating. Just not quite there yet sadly.
Last edited by PPRuNeUser0172; 13th Jan 2014 at 20:08.
Dirty Sanchez
I'm biting my tongue as hard as I can and will not be drawn into a public debate on the rights and wrongs of MFTS. As someone who is intimately familiar with both MFTS (IV Sqn) and NFTC I can tell you that you are much further from the mark than you think on several counts.
BV
BV
So, BV, that would indicate that you disagree with the statement:
Even though you are 'intimately familiar' with IV Sqn?
Hopefully no self-seeking airship will direct manning to sort out the chaos at Valley - and the whole failed MFTS experiment will be consigned to the rubbish bin of history.
The Hawk T2 and the syllabus might be one thing, but the bolleaux of MFTS quite something else....
MFTS in principle is not a bad thing as a concept...
Hopefully no self-seeking airship will direct manning to sort out the chaos at Valley - and the whole failed MFTS experiment will be consigned to the rubbish bin of history.
The Hawk T2 and the syllabus might be one thing, but the bolleaux of MFTS quite something else....
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BV,
I regret any incorrect assumptions about the similarity of MFTS and NFTC, again I don't wish to be critical of either system but merely offered my tuppence of thoughts. With your insight what makes them so different?
I am afraid I cannot support the notion that MFTS should be banished to the bin. It is, whether rightly or wrongly the system that is now in place and it is incumbent on all involved to see it through is it not?
I am surprised there is an apparent shortage of QFIs; now is this because the system (and I am looking specifically at IV Sqn) can't train them, or that the FJ desk are not posting people to Valley?
I regret any incorrect assumptions about the similarity of MFTS and NFTC, again I don't wish to be critical of either system but merely offered my tuppence of thoughts. With your insight what makes them so different?
I am afraid I cannot support the notion that MFTS should be banished to the bin. It is, whether rightly or wrongly the system that is now in place and it is incumbent on all involved to see it through is it not?
I am surprised there is an apparent shortage of QFIs; now is this because the system (and I am looking specifically at IV Sqn) can't train them, or that the FJ desk are not posting people to Valley?
it is incumbent on all involved to see it through is it not?
IMHO, MFTS is a set too far, is incompatible with any number of government policies and risks destroying what was once, arguably, the best military training system there was. If it fails now we still have the knowledge and skills "in house" to recover the situation. If we leave it another 5 years............
DS
I think I can answer that without putting my foot in it!
At NFTC, the contractor provides the jets, sim and infrastructure and nothing more.
Under MFTS the contractor is supposed to provide everything except the pink bodies to fill the QFI shaped flying suits.
BEagle, you're just being mischievious.
BV
At NFTC, the contractor provides the jets, sim and infrastructure and nothing more.
Under MFTS the contractor is supposed to provide everything except the pink bodies to fill the QFI shaped flying suits.
BEagle, you're just being mischievious.
BV
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cheers BV,
Forgive me for being dim, but I still don't see what huge differences exist between the 2. Not that it matters... NFTC is working and according to many here MFTS isn't.
Apart from jets, sim and infrastructure, what are MFTS expected to provide that NFTC aren't? Doesn't "infrastructure" cover syllabus, IT etc etc. Both systems rely on a supply of instructors by their respective Air Force(s). Are Ascent been given the QFIs they were guaranteed to make the programme viable?
Roland,
Is this a matter of perspective? Do civilian contractors who work for Ascent really (and deliberately) not provide what it is they are supposed to? Is it down to a badly written contract, lacking the finer details which only come to light once the system is "running"? These issues then lead to a bunfight over who does them and at whose expense...
Clearly what is not in question is the frustration but is one side firmly to blame?
Forgive me for being dim, but I still don't see what huge differences exist between the 2. Not that it matters... NFTC is working and according to many here MFTS isn't.
At NFTC, the contractor provides the jets, sim and infrastructure and nothing more
Roland,
Unfortunately it is time that civilian contractors, who fail to meet their part of the contract, we're dealt with severely
Clearly what is not in question is the frustration but is one side firmly to blame?
Ascent UK MFTS
DS.
I didn't choose my words very well perhaps. By infrastructure I just meant stuff. At NFTC the military developed, wrote and standardize the syllabus. MFTS are supposed to do that themselves and the military guys just teach it.
BV
I didn't choose my words very well perhaps. By infrastructure I just meant stuff. At NFTC the military developed, wrote and standardize the syllabus. MFTS are supposed to do that themselves and the military guys just teach it.
BV
Is it down to a badly written contract, lacking the finer details which only come to light once the system is "running"?
at whose expense
A couple of points here.......
Sorry mate - but the MFTS programme was going a long, long way before a wokka mate woke up and found himself wearing the daddy pants. Ergo - your statement [in this context] is hoop.
Secondly, the RW element was still in full swing as I left; Ascent were advertising for some very, very highly qualified and uniquely experienced individuals. Unfortunately, HR seemed to have mixed the offered salary with jobseekers allowance. I guessed those interested were expected to fund their employment from their service pension.
Pay peanuts - get monkeys.... et voila!
BEags
A nice thought, but, the majority of 'airships' at the top these days are wokka types with only a recent operational background in the North West Frontier!
The fall from grace of the Fast Jet jockey since we went back to the sandpit after '91 has been damaging top-end capability ever since we let a kipper mate in to run 11Gp.
A nice thought, but, the majority of 'airships' at the top these days are wokka types with only a recent operational background in the North West Frontier!
The fall from grace of the Fast Jet jockey since we went back to the sandpit after '91 has been damaging top-end capability ever since we let a kipper mate in to run 11Gp.
Secondly, the RW element was still in full swing as I left; Ascent were advertising for some very, very highly qualified and uniquely experienced individuals. Unfortunately, HR seemed to have mixed the offered salary with jobseekers allowance. I guessed those interested were expected to fund their employment from their service pension.
Pay peanuts - get monkeys.... et voila!
Daily Post says it's great: RAF Valley: Hawk T2 aircraft mean fast jet training for pilots is faster than ever - Daily Post
A nice thought, but, the majority of 'airships' at the top these days are wokka types with only a recent operational background in the North West Frontier!
The fall from grace of the Fast Jet jockey since we went back to the sandpit after '91 has been damaging top-end capability ever since we let a kipper mate in to run 11Gp.
The fall from grace of the Fast Jet jockey since we went back to the sandpit after '91 has been damaging top-end capability ever since we let a kipper mate in to run 11Gp.
I had a little chuckle to myself with that as well. In my 30 odd years in Her Majesty's Flying Club there have only been 2 non-FJ Chiefs, Sir Peter H and the current CAS. And of course the 'kipper mate' referred to, ran the amalgamated 11/18 Gp rather than just 11 Gp - sadly probably a reflection of the decline in power of HMFC!!
Last edited by Roland Pulfrew; 14th Jan 2014 at 15:15.
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 50
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi guys,
this is my first post...I am an Italian Air Force Pilot Instructor, my family is from Uk and lives in Edinburgh. I have been in Ascent offices for an interview for the position as Subject Matter Expert. They are still in touch with me but before I leave the AF and start commuting from Bristol rather than Italy I was wondering if anyone can give me some info about the company
Thanks a lot for your help.
this is my first post...I am an Italian Air Force Pilot Instructor, my family is from Uk and lives in Edinburgh. I have been in Ascent offices for an interview for the position as Subject Matter Expert. They are still in touch with me but before I leave the AF and start commuting from Bristol rather than Italy I was wondering if anyone can give me some info about the company
Thanks a lot for your help.
Last edited by jamesmaybrick; 31st Jan 2014 at 05:56.