Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Independent pay review

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Independent pay review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Dec 2013, 08:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile Independent pay review

BBC News - MPs set to receive 11% pay rise

Bodes well for the acceptance of our own independent pay review body recommendation this year
MechGov is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 08:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Averages out at 2 percent a year considering they have had a pay freeze since 2010. And 75k isn't exactly a lot for your average backbencher, equivalent to level 31 Pro aviator.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 08:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the problem is there are far too many of them - both the house and the Lords should be capped at say 400 each
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 08:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice work if you can get it. I work for local government and have had a pay freeze since 2007. There was a rumour we were getting 1% this year but that's just been scotched. Yes I know that MPs don't set their own pay rises.
Dave Wilson is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 10:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,167
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Given that there are over a 100 paid ministers for Westminster alone (Wales, Scotland and NI add yet more), if you are in power the odd of pulling in just a basic backbencher's salary from the tax payer is relatively low.

For other professions the MPs would be very keen to point out the expenses, grace and favour, tax breaks, direct employment of spouses and other family members, pension accrual rate, golden goodbyes, no record of hours actually worked, no compulsion to actually come to work etc etc….

Just This Once... is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 10:29
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 630
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
However it's not just being an so called underpaid MP is it, how many of us could do these jobs whilst in 'full employment'?

Alan Milburn
Labour, Darlington
Former health secretary earned up to £30,000 last year as an adviser to Lloydspharmacy's Healthcare Advisory Panel, up to £35,000 as an adviser to equity investment firm Bridgepoint Capital, up to £25,000 as an adviser to PepsiCo UK, up to £25,000 from writing articles for national newspapers and an unknown sum as a non-executive director of AM Strategy Ltd, according to his declaration in the Register of Interests. Known total: up to £115,000
David Blunkett
Labour, Sheffield Brightside
Former home secetary earned up to £50,000 last year as an adviser to online logistics firm UC Group, up to £30,000 as an adviser to employment firm A4E Ltd, up to £25,000 from First Group as chair of Commission on School Transport, up to £60,000 fron newspaper articles including a 12-column Sun contract worth up to £50,000, up to £25,000 for speeches and an unknown sum as a non-executive director of Tribune Business Systems according to his declaration in the Register of Interests. Total: up to £190,000
dctyke is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 10:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It is OK, they are getting an 8% pay cut when Scotland gets independence.

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 10:57
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just This Once: if you graphed that against the UK total population, it would (without crunching the maths properly) be pretty much a flat line.

Whether a proportionate increase in population means we need a proportionate increase in legislators and administrators is a different question (though it's assumed by Onceapilot)...
tmmorris is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 14:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,167
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
I think our Empire was a little bit bigger at the start of the graph….
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 16:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 630
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
^^^^^

However no minister for overseas aid!
dctyke is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 16:17
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Middle England
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bodes well for the acceptance of our own independent pay review body recommendation this year
Regrettably our own 'Independent' Review Body only recommends the amount the government has identified as the maximum, thus 1% recommendation this year. Look what happened to the AFPRB Chairman when he snuck the X factor increase in!!
Jumping_Jack is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 16:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Yorkshire....God's Country
Age: 59
Posts: 472
Received 43 Likes on 20 Posts
"Bodes well for the acceptance of our own independent pay review body recommendation this year"


Don't you believe it mate........we tried it once (2002) and even used the same independent pay revue body that the government had just used to award themselves a stonking pay rise........they recommended we get a thirty per cent pay rise but funnily enough the then labour government told us to get stuffed! Not surprising really...........how were we so stupid as to think that Bliar and the economic "boy wonder" Brown could be expected to play fair!


I know mate, you don't really believe either do you?
mopardave is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 16:52
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not scotland
Posts: 360
Received 64 Likes on 31 Posts
Am I the only one who could catch the irony in the first statement?

Last edited by Toadstool; 8th Dec 2013 at 20:50.
Toadstool is online now  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 17:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,167
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
No!

Just This Once... is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 20:23
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Yorkshire....God's Country
Age: 59
Posts: 472
Received 43 Likes on 20 Posts
of course not!
mopardave is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 20:44
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,350
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
"They don't set their own pay", etc. But happy to take it.

The only truth here is politicians setting pay restraint for gov employees and verbally scolding bankers et al for their pay whilst acepting a very big pay rise by any standards.

I'm sorry, but when they are cutting everyone else's pay/benefits/etc, this massive pay rise sends an unimaginable message to the people they've been telling how important austerity is. Irony? No, arrogance.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 20:54
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mp's pay has never equalled their responsibility or expectations in terms of abode location. One of the prime reasons stated for fiddled expenses has always been that allowances made up for the poor pay of MPs, as salaries have been suppressed over the years for political reasons.

Would Cameron and milliband be saying that they opposed the rise if it didn't win them votes at the next election?

If anyone is jealous of mp pay, why not inform manning you are running at the next by election?

Last edited by VinRouge; 8th Dec 2013 at 21:08.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 21:14
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,350
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by VinRouge
One of the prime reasons stated for fiddled expenses has always been that allowances made up for the poor pay of MPs, as salaries have been suppressed over the years for political reasons.
Try using that excuse if you were, say, a member of the Armed Forces, a civil servant or a policeman.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 21:44
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Neither did the MPs that tried that reason. (Mostly labour btw).
VinRouge is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2013, 22:36
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Yorkshire....God's Country
Age: 59
Posts: 472
Received 43 Likes on 20 Posts
"If anyone is jealous of mp pay, why not inform manning you are running at the next by election?"


Jealous........strange choice of word. Jealousy has nothing whatsoever to do with it.......it's about leading by example. Something I would have thought any forces officer worth his or her salt would strive to demonstrate to his or her subordinates. Here we go again........snouts back in the trough! Courtney is quite right.......try any, and I mean any funny business in my branch of the emergency services and it's goodnight Vienna........and rightly so. I don't want to be told we're in it together, when clearly, we aren't!
mopardave is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.