Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

New USN Carrier USS Gerald R Ford

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New USN Carrier USS Gerald R Ford

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Nov 2013, 08:00
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,961
Received 149 Likes on 90 Posts
It wouldn't be christened USS Barack Hussein Obama, but surely propheted.
jolihokistix is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 08:08
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london,uk
Posts: 735
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I wonder if BAe had a hand in the design
BAe bought the QE class design from the French
peter we is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 09:21
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 509
Received 21 Likes on 6 Posts
I thought one had to be dead to have a warship named (exception Bush but there is time) so Carter misses out for the moment. I think the QE referred to was the 1st but could be wrong and PoW refers to the generic position (the last ship so named was sunk in 1941 after a short and not very sucessful career).
vascodegama is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 09:35
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Asia's Fine City
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
USS Johnson could be an interesting double entendre.
kluge is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 10:50
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: liverpool uk
Age: 67
Posts: 1,338
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
Jimmy Carter was an engineer on nuclear submarines.
air pig is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 11:35
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
Would anyone want to see a USS Obama?
No worries, ain't gonna happen.
Why the heck not? Ford was the wettest President in a century, dead from the neck up and spineless below it. Who even remembers him?

Obama ain't so bad.
Agaricus bisporus is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 11:45
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london,uk
Posts: 735
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Ford was the wettest President in a century, dead from the neck up and spineless below it.
He served on an aircraft carrier in WW2.

Later, he became President.
peter we is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 12:19
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
USS William Jefferson Clinton

Ab
Yep - I don't like the man but I could argue he will put the USA first and foremost above every other nation on the planet. Maybe that's why they name all of them after the Prez. anyway?

What about the USS William Jefferson Clinton then? In fairness to him then that should be like er, a nursing ship, hospital ship manned by fit trim specimens of the USAs finest military females? And maybe with a bit of R+R capability for the troops thrown in? A party ship? Relax the alcohol rule.....free 30 minute laundry...
Bet they'd be no fiscal hang-ups funding that.

In counter we can have HMS......John Major. HMS Prescott. HMS Blunkett. HMS Boris Johnson. HMS Milligan (higher proportion of the gender diverse, transsexual, gay and lesbian military community to volunteer for that one I think). A whole new class of ship and nothing that we don't deserve.
Enough. Po face mode back on again.
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 13:18
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bury St. Edmunds
Age: 64
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know if CVN 78 is under/on/over budget?

Also, what is the cost (excl air group) of one US super carrier versus one QE2 class one either outright cost or tonne for tonne?

I know that US CV's are all nuclear powered, (hence the N!) and that ours won't be but what difference will that make in use (apart from being able to visit nuclear free zones such as NZ) in terms of running costs. (i.e. an mpg equivalent).

As an ex- crab I must say that had the RN had serious FW flying to offer (in 1979) I might have been tempted to chose a dark blue suit rather than the light blue variety! Good luck to those starting their careers in 2017; I hope we can afford to keep them going and still have a Royal Navy for the next 50 years!

MB

Last edited by Madbob; 11th Nov 2013 at 14:30.
Madbob is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 13:54
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 517 Likes on 215 Posts
Nuke vs Conventional power.....Endurance!

Our big Carriers can off load fuel to Escorts if no Oiler is nearby.

Yours will be dependent upon Oilers themselves.

Ability to generate Electrical Power for Disaster support purposes.

Not visiting New Zealand is not a huge loss now is it?

Quite a bit of difference really.
SASless is online now  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 14:04
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Pole
Posts: 970
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Why is it rusty before it's even delivered?

One would not accept a new car with rust so why accept a ship?
newt is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 16:00
  #32 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Newt
The rust on the bow? That had gone, I noticed in a picture of the official "launch" the other day. The bow was tight up on the Casson to a few inches so maybe it had been recently whacked by a close moving vehicle or similar docky thing? Rain got in, bit of rust developed?
There will be a lot more slap put on that thing before final acceptance. You never get them gleaming anyway, even from new.
Although when I was on HMS Daring for a shortie from new that was gleaming, beautiful, buzzing with power. That felt brand new.(Top Captain and ships company-what a difference).
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 16:08
  #33 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
POL supply to the new RN carriers.

The RFA hasn't even got the tankers for the RN CV program yet. They are still in build in Korea/Orient last I heard and then have to come here as hulls to (Barrow? Birkenhead?) for fitting out. This lack off was yet another piece of verbal crap I had to deal with from the miserable bearded RFA monkies on one of their precious f&ckin ships I was actually on (and which they actually think they and their "company" owns. rather than HM the Queen and her loyal taxpayers.
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 17:30
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 530
Received 174 Likes on 93 Posts
Quote:
I wonder if BAe had a hand in the design

BAe bought the QE class design from the French
Sorry Peter, that's about as far away from the truth as you can get. The basic design of the ship was undertaken by BMT - albeit under contract to Thales UK. Subsequent iterations have been a joint endeavour under the Aircraft Carrier Alliance.

However, HMG did manage to sell the QE design to the French government in around 2006/7 for £100M (reportedly). Allegedly the French chief naval arch had a fit (and not in a good way) when he saw what they'd paid for (problem being the lack of detail at that stage, not the actual design).
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 17:59
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london,uk
Posts: 735
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
HMG did manage to sell the QE design to the French government in around 2006/7 for £100M
Ah, so its all good then!
peter we is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 18:12
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Brizzle
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Jimmy Carter was an engineer on nuclear submarines.

and has a Seawolf class SSN named after him:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Jimmy_Carter_(SSN-23)
Flap Track 6 is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 19:39
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,578
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Nice ship, not so sure about the name though - as some have already noted, he wasn't exactly the most inspiring prez. Maybe they should start using VP's names instead e.g the USS Dan Quayle.

Is there one named after Ford's predecessor?
dead_pan is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 20:16
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,056
Received 2,931 Likes on 1,250 Posts
Take some nails, bits of board, nail them together and call it Ford..

With Boris Airport in for some £49 odd billion, it would be cheaper to buy one of these and anchor it in the Thames.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 20:57
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Obama ain't so bad.
In your world maybe, not mine.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2013, 23:06
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 46 Posts
J-15 Green, ORANGE & RED Lights for PLAN LSO

ON previous page: http://www.pprune.org/military-aircr...ml#post8145066 'Hangarshuffle' had indicated the J-15 photos. In URL below substitute 'blog' for the "blag" in the URL to go to the original photo:

http://4.bp.blagspot.com/-5B_QXZoC_a...tional+(2).jpg

In the zoom pic below we see the vertical GREEN, ORANGE & RED lights for the PLAN LSO to gauge aircraft at Optimum Angle of Attack during a night approach particularly.

SpazSinbad is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.