Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Looking for advice: ex Jaguar GR1(a) pilots/maint.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Looking for advice: ex Jaguar GR1(a) pilots/maint.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Oct 2013, 18:52
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South Central UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jaguar NAVWASS

Ah NAVWASS! An amazing system that always knew when the cloud base was low and displayed a 'Big Cross' on the HUD when the wheels were selected up. Just enough time to check the HDD was vaguely indicating the correct horizon before the world disappeared. Happy memories!

lm
lightningmate is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2013, 18:58
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: kemble
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NAVWASS was great - even when it dumped, with a regular bunging in of the wind you got a map of the country - not er.. necessarily where you were in it, but nonetheless the country you took off in.

When 1064 went you were gone gone gone.

Ackle, ackle, phase change, regress PLF PLND...
ANDY CUBIN is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2013, 19:27
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Gents ... Is there any truth in the rumour that the Jag was once mooted as a possible mount for the Red's ?
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2013, 19:42
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South Central UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CS,

The original Jaguar procurement was as the RAF Advanced Flying Training platform, so that possibility could have happened. However, it was quickly realised that adopting Jaguar in that role would be 'unwise' so a new role was found for Jaguar and the Hawk came along in-lieu.

The French were even thinking of embarking Jaguar on their Carrier! Flight trials quickly raised concerns, the fright of single-engine wave-offs sealed the situation - Non!!!!!

lm
lightningmate is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2013, 19:47
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cheers LM
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2013, 20:33
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: @ a loss
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The original Jaguar procurement was as the RAF Advanced Flying Training platform
As Dave Oakley, Harrier pilot of 3(F), once remarked - If The Jag had become the advanced trainer, Valley would be magnetic North by now!

And, yes, I am type rated on both Jag and Harrier, and enjoyed both, so I am allowed to comment.

Last edited by Bus14; 6th Oct 2013 at 16:15. Reason: To apologise for mistakenly believing that Soaks wos not ere.
Bus14 is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2013, 20:55
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard a rumour they Were looking to reengine the jag but they found a pair of lawn mower lumps overstressed the engine mounts, far too torquey.

They then tried a petrol strimmer but that was too unreliable.....

In the end they stuck with the adour and fitted a creme brûlée torch to it.
cornish-stormrider is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2013, 21:23
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Back to the fold in the map
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
The Late Dave Oakley

Bus - "the late Dave Oakley" - are you trying to tell me something about Soaks? CB

Last edited by Canadian Break; 1st Oct 2013 at 21:24.
Canadian Break is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 06:45
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would like to know about that too.

He and I were in contact a few weeks ago.

Godfather to my daughter.

edit: and please note that lightningmate and I (Lightning Mate) are not the same persons.

Last edited by Lightning Mate; 2nd Oct 2013 at 06:47.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 07:30
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Midlands,UK
Age: 58
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it true that the Jag was only given a second engine so that it could get to the accident site?
flap15 is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 07:38
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mine got there with no engines.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 08:15
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South Central UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But quickly

lm
lightningmate is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 13:31
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Having an interest in "Historic Early Computing" (sad I know) ... I found this article quite interesting in Flight International 1973 about the MCS.920M/NAVWASS Jag implementation and thought I'd share

Looks to me if it might have been a direct lift from the sales blurb at the time

Flight International Jaguar NAVWASS

Also an interesting snippet here as to why it had a tendency to topple with alacrity ...

NAVWASS Avionics

The NAVWASS system used a novel "rotating platform" technique where the whole instrument package rotated so that gyro drift would be nulled out (meaning that cheaper/poorer performance sensors could be used).

Unfortunately this meant that all the interface signals had to pass over slip rings: any electrical noise on these slip rings was interpreted by the nav computer as a fault and the system had a tendency to "dump" on take off. As a result of complaints by the Jaguar pilots, the system was subsequently replaced by the Ferranti FIN 1075.
Maybe a NavInst expert/technician can add more ...

Last edited by CoffmanStarter; 2nd Oct 2013 at 13:31.
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 13:50
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
NAVWASS was replaced by FIN1064, not FIN1075.

That was the change from GR1 to GR1A.

Last edited by Lightning Mate; 2nd Oct 2013 at 13:50.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 13:55
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for correcting LM
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 14:12
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pleasure.

The correct name for the NAVWASS rotating platform was a carousel platform.

In those days it was common way of minimising drift, and not just for the E3R platform used in NAVWASS.

BTW, the early Nimrods had the same kit.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 18:16
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Almost right LM.

The E3R rotated one revolution every 5min 43secs and as noted the slip rings were the primary cause of Navwass dumps. The system was designed to indicate which black box was at fault, Platform (P) Platform Electronic Unit (PEU) or Power Supply Unit (PSU) but in practice (as I'm sure you're aware) all three lights would normally indicate on the NCU.

The Nimrod Mk1 was fitted with an E3 platform which did not rotate. The Mk2 had the Fin 1012. The problem with these platforms were that the gyro/accelerometer package was physically slaved to true north. However an opportunity arose when an R was in the NMSU. I was on the Nimrod development team and was encouraged to rob it of it's Delco Carousels (one rev every minute) and fit them to a couple Mk2s. On going past 90deg N the Fin 1012s continued to indicate up to an untheoretical 92.5 deg N before toppling! Needless to say the Navs didn't want to give the Carousels back.
Wasser is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 19:11
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, NAVWASS, not heard that term in years. I spent no end of hours working in funny positions installing that lot from a kit into the Jag's as an up and coming J/T. Oh the memories of 'F' Hangar at Abingdon, is it still going?
howard2107 is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 19:13
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember the Jag as being the aircraft that would never need modifying.
I worked on mod number 1063 amongst others!
howard2107 is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 20:07
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Away from home Rat
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MOD 1114.. Getting rid of the 920 and the E3R for the INU..

MOD 1041, keeping the wings together..

F Shed died when the Army took over Abo in 1992.

DARA at Saints until 2006.. Aircraft out of there had so much wrong with them.

Any flight sim modellers, please, please, please.. JAGUAR DID NOT HAVE AILERONS!!
Alber Ratman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.