Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Why no royals in fast jets?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Why no royals in fast jets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jul 2013, 23:01
  #161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
Or would special attention still be paid to Fl Lt Wales's helicopters
that he flies ?
Well of course old chap.....of course the Apache he flies in combat in the Sandbox has been given the Half Life treatment and a Zero/Zero Ejection seat installed along with the Blade Shed system.

One cannot be too careful in ensuring the continued succession to the Big Chair now can One?
SASless is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2013, 02:48
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,387
Received 224 Likes on 103 Posts
Let's get back on thread:



"Why no royals in fast jets?"



Because it gets tricky putting an experienced "copilot" into a single seat jet to keep an eye on His Regal Uppityness's activities.
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Old 31st Jul 2013, 04:51
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK, sometimes!
Age: 74
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or would special attention still be paid to Fl Lt Wales's helicopters
that he flies ?
Well of course old chap.....of course the Apache he flies in combat in the Sandbox has been given the Half Life treatment and a Zero/Zero Ejection seat installed along with the Blade Shed system.

One cannot be too careful in ensuring the continued succession to the Big Chair now can One?
SASless, Flt Lt Wales does NOT fly Apache helicopters and does NOT fly "in combat in the sandbox"
Mad_Mark is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2013, 12:59
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
My mistake.....all them Royals begin to look alike after a while!
SASless is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2013, 14:15
  #165 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,698
Received 51 Likes on 24 Posts
My mistake.....all them Royals begin to look alike after a while!
a very fair call. At least your Presidents - even if closely related - do not look like each other!
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2013, 14:44
  #166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
To correct my error.....does the Apache get that kind of half life treatment?
SASless is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2013, 15:40
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
To correct my error.....does the Apache get that kind of half life treatment?
Nope because Capt Wales is the spare not the heir, that is Flt Lt Wales.

Actually I have no idea!!
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2013, 15:53
  #168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TTN
I knew several guys who had been turned down for fast jets and who went on to become very competent and experienced captains of multi engined/crew aircraft.
...and I can think of a number of FJ pilots who failed commercial airline command courses .....

It is horses for courses, not some sort of hierarchy.
And I for one, on the eve of the 50th anniversary of my first solo, have as much respect for a good helicopter pilot as I have for a good fast-jet or a good multi-engine pilot or civil airline commander. The number able to swop places and still excel has proved to be small.

The point is the Royals had a go and qualified when they didn't need to make the effort. All credit for that.
They are better in their eventual roles for the experience, and the Services are better for having Royals able to speak up for them with authority, in an era when most politicians have absolutely no military knowledge or experience.
Albert Driver is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2013, 22:28
  #169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location!
Posts: 2,302
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
Nope because Capt Wales is the spare not the heir, that is Flt Lt Wales.

Oh no he's not!

Jack
Union Jack is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2013, 00:52
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Heir is Charlie Windsor. (Charles Philip Arthur George)

Flt. Lt. Wales is Heir+1. (William Arthur Philip Louis)

Baby Georgie Wales is Heir+2. (George Alexander Louis)

Capt. Wales is the spare to Heir+2... nothing more than a back-up to the #3 in-line. (Henry Charles Albert David)

Last edited by GreenKnight121; 1st Aug 2013 at 00:58.
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2013, 07:28
  #171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
time for a Republic................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2013, 07:51
  #172 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Thank you GK and UJ, I am perfectly aware that there is No 1 and a new No 3, but you know what I mean.

And no HH it isn't!! Can't think of anything worse than having someone like TB or DC as "president".
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2013, 08:52
  #173 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,698
Received 51 Likes on 24 Posts
Can't think of anything worse than having someone like TB or DC as "president".
Indeed so, and they wouldn't be cheap (see my post #143.)

And they probably wouldn't be DC or TB (TG!)

Countries with separate Heads of State and Heads of Government, tend to have old and/or failed and/or obscure pollies as Pres - eg Germany. We all know Frau Merkel is Chancellor, but who is Pres? (answer below*)

So we'd get someone like Healey or Heseltine Whoever they were, they wouldn't live in a Council Flat and commute with their 'Bus Pass.











* Joachim Gauk, who has two residences, one in Berlin and one in Bonn.

Last edited by teeteringhead; 1st Aug 2013 at 08:53.
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2013, 08:53
  #174 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
And no HH it isn't!! Can't think of anything worse than having someone like TB or DC as "president".
Or instead of the American model where the president is the political leader, we could go down the German road (and that of many other European countries) where we continue to have a political leader (as in Chancellor Merkel) and some faceless background figure that nobody has ever heard of as president. (Do you know who the German president is? I certainly don't and can't be bothered to Google him/her).

Can't see either system appeals, I'd much rather stick to our present arrangement.

edited to add - Great minds, teeteringhead, you were answering my question as I was posing it. And no, his name still doesn't ring a bell!

Last edited by Tankertrashnav; 1st Aug 2013 at 08:56.
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2013, 08:55
  #175 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,698
Received 51 Likes on 24 Posts
TTN Snap! akakkfknfikeewori
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2013, 16:53
  #176 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"some faceless background figure that nobody has ever heard of"

The Queen has never given an interview in 60+ years in the top job.......
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2013, 18:21
  #177 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow

I wonder why that is and if that might change in the future,
after all, she has opened up a bit.

Instead of "An interview with the Queen" it could be "an interview with a Bond girl". She took to that like a duck to water as well as accepting an award.
And got a lot of kudos out of it !


I wonder if Daniel Craig is the only person to have given the Queen
a subtle "hurry up" by coughing
500N is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2013, 05:18
  #178 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK, sometimes!
Age: 74
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Queen has never given an interview in 60+ years in the top job.......
You mean apart from this one...

Mad_Mark is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2013, 07:14
  #179 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
That's v. interesting - I didn't know that interview existed.
I reckon Lilybet's always come across as a very shrewd stateswoman.
Remember reading somewhere she's also a very good mimic - in private does quite funny impressions of well known people she's met.
tartare is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2013, 07:50
  #180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The monarchy is like everything else in the UK - we hang on to something for years and years and years and everyone says when change is suggested "the sky will fall on our heads"

then it changes and 6 months later people have forgotten all about the issue in question
Heathrow Harry is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.