Odds on favourite...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know why they just refuse to answer questions
by the media they don't like or just not invite them to
anything. They'd soon get the message and miss stories.
Or release photos of the baby and both of them on a royal web site
before walking outside the door of the hospital.
by the media they don't like or just not invite them to
anything. They'd soon get the message and miss stories.
Or release photos of the baby and both of them on a royal web site
before walking outside the door of the hospital.
Last edited by 500N; 22nd Jul 2013 at 17:03.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know why they just refuse to answer questions
by the media they don't like or just not invite them to
anything. They'd soon get the message and miss stories.
Or release photos of the baby and both of them on a royal web site
before walking outside the door of the hospital.
by the media they don't like or just not invite them to
anything. They'd soon get the message and miss stories.
Or release photos of the baby and both of them on a royal web site
before walking outside the door of the hospital.
Last edited by TomJoad; 22nd Jul 2013 at 18:24.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It isn't a plate you need, but one of these in which to deposit your lunch when it comes back up...
Don't get me wrong, I'll happily wish any and every proud new mum'n'dad all the very best.
But when *******s like these start fawning all over the fekin telly...
then I'm afraid I'm overwhelmed by a sudden urge to up-chuck...
Don't get me wrong, I'll happily wish any and every proud new mum'n'dad all the very best.
But when *******s like these start fawning all over the fekin telly...
then I'm afraid I'm overwhelmed by a sudden urge to up-chuck...
No offence Coffman, feel free to hurl a virtual punch at me.
Last edited by TomJoad; 22nd Jul 2013 at 18:26.
Originally Posted by Tom Joad
in Tudor days it was not unheard of to have the whole court and uncle Tom Cobbley present at the birth
HRH only has the medical staff and her husband. Much better, I think. The rat pack is outside and becoming increasingly frustrated by the wait. Good luck to them, them scum-siucking leaches.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,185
Received 3,041 Likes
on
1,282 Posts
Typical women, keeping everyone hanging around all day...
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually, completely the opposite. Royal births used to be attended by a huge number of people. Very many ladies in waiting, officials, so called doctors, even (it is reported) the Secretary of State. IN THE ROOM.
HRH only has the medical staff and her husband. Much better, I think. The rat pack is outside and becoming increasingly frustrated by the wait. Good luck to them, them scum-siucking leaches.
HRH only has the medical staff and her husband. Much better, I think. The rat pack is outside and becoming increasingly frustrated by the wait. Good luck to them, them scum-siucking leaches.
Must be my accent
Gentleman Aviator
in Tudor days it was not unheard of to have the whole court and uncle Tom Cobbley present at the birth
In the event King Billy soon appeared to see off James II/VII et al at the Boyne, having previously married Mary, a child of James II/VII's first (Protestant) marriage - so much for male primogeniture! The Brits didn't generally go for the Roman way, and it was finally sorted by the Act of Settlement of 1701, which legally barred RCs - or those who married them - from the Succession. Still in force, the most senior current exclusion is George Windsor, Earl of St Andrews (Son of Duke of Kent) who would have been 33rd in line (D of K is now #32).
As Milady Teeters is of the Roman persuasion, I too had to forgo my position, so someone else can now claim my place as 37,497,254th in line!
