Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Auf Wiedersehn, Phantom!

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Auf Wiedersehn, Phantom!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jul 2013, 19:17
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somerset
Age: 68
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A testament to the sturdiness of the aircraft and care given to it by the mechanics that allowed it to last so long.
I remember a Luftwaffe Mig 29 and an F4 sqn at Deci in '97 wiw there IV(AC). It was always a toss-up who would get to the bar before closing, us or the F4s. They were very much in the work hard, play hard mould.
The others didn't socialise.

R
Riskman is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 19:43
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@NutLosse:

They will not be offered to museums, all 8 remaining aircraft are now at Jever airbase.
Starting tomorrow, they will be scapped. Only one or two of them will be used as gate guards, 37+01, the blue bird, will end up at Wittmund airbase.
This aircraft was the first that was delivered and one of the last to take off from Wittmund.

Tom
Thone1 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 19:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Wie Schade!

Warum so?

BEagle is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 21:49
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's wonder the US didn't take them back to be used as target drones
unless they have moved on from the Phantom already and don't
have any more conversion parts.
500N is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 22:08
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,609
Received 43 Likes on 30 Posts
QF-16 Drone

500N,

The USAF is moving onto the QF-16 as an aerial target.

QF-16 drone arrives for testing, prepares warfighters for tomorrow's threats
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 22:19
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAF Eng,

Thanks for that, much appreciated.

I vaguely remembered in an article about the QF-4 Drones that because the F4's had sat in the bone yard for so long "additional" complications occurred like cracked fuel tanks etc and I thought fully F4's would make it easier but not
to be.
500N is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2013, 01:10
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Age: 69
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There were 10 F-4Es built for the Luftwaffe as well, they were kept in the States for training, and the survivors were retired and sent to the boneyard some time ago.

They used to send Phantoms and Alpha Jets from Goose Bay to airshows around North America. I remember talking to a German Phantom pilot at an airshow in the mid 80's, and he said that he hoped the Russians didn't invade that weekend, because the whole Goose Bay contingent was at airshows!
54Phan is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2013, 02:02
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Age: 69
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As an aside, and totally off topic, am I the only person who thinks that "warfighters" is a stupid word? Answers on a postcard.
54Phan is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2013, 04:16
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Midwest US
Age: 68
Posts: 80
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
We build 'em to last here in St. Louis.

Still do, although the original works are out of service now. The last aircraft I saw on the ramp that over 10,000 jets rolled out on was the Solar Impulse. Quite a change from a fire-belching pair of J-79s.

TWB
twb3 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2013, 05:50
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
As an aside, and totally off topic, am I the only person who thinks that "warfighters" is a stupid word?
I agree. It sounds like the title of some 1/6d 'War Picture Library' comic....
BEagle is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2013, 12:03
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Orac

SECTION X - PROCEDURE FOR REDUCTION
BY MEANS OF STATIC DISPLAY
But the UK MOD policy was not to declare any Treaty-Limited Eqpt under this section, which is why all the gate guardians were declared under CFE as TLE, irrespective of state, flyability/fireability.

I never understood the reasoning, perhaps there was an element of being 'holier then thou' about it? I am not even sure we produce an annual declaration for CFE any more, though I am guessing there is still one for the Vienna Document Treaty.

STH
SirToppamHat is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 07:42
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
STH,

The census used for the CFE declaration, Vienna Document, etc is still produced. Census taken 2nd week of October.

'Data Quality'

UKDS 2012 - Chapter 4 - Formations, Vessels, Aircraft and Vehicles of the Armed Forces

The census, which is sponsored by the MOD Arms Control and Counter Proliferation Policy Department (ACP), is normally completed in the 2nd week of October each year. It directs all UK military Formations and Units to provide detailed information on their holdings of military hardware.
2012

Still 5 F-4s listed on CFE declared sites.

F4 Phantom *2 (2.Obsolete non-operational equipment used as training aids, gate guardians and museum pieces on CFE declared sites.)
'Table 4.13 Aircraft Holdings in the UK, Germany, Cyprus and Gibraltar within the scope of the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty, at 1 January each year'

UKDS 2012 - Chapter 4 - Formations, Vessels, Aircraft and Vehicles of the Armed Forces

'Table 4.15 Declared Attack Helicopters and Combat Aircraft Holdings and Ceilings by country within the scope of the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty, at 1 January 2012'

UKDS 2012 - Chapter 4 - Formations, Vessels, Aircraft and Vehicles of the Armed Forces

'Chapter 4 - Formations, Vessels, Aircraft and Vehicles of the Armed Forces'

UKDS 2012 - Chapter 4 - Formations, Vessels, Aircraft and Vehicles of the Armed Forces

UKDS 2012

Last edited by TEEEJ; 9th Jul 2013 at 07:44.
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 08:38
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: gateshead
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
reference the tornado f3 posts, although the RAF may of made them out of service, i know first hand there are around 8 f3's still in serviceable condition! seems they have outlasted the F4 phantoms..........
stuminisprite is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 09:41
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 82
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Warfighting is the military term describing the strategic maoeuvre activity of conventional warfare with few constraints between opposing formations of all arms. Examples are Yom Kippur, Op Granby, Op Corporate, blitzkrieg.
As opposed to lower intensity conflicts like Op Banner, Malayan emergency, Borneo confrontation, Afghanistan (though here the expression low intensity is somewhat misleading).
Yes, I do think "warfighters" is a silly word.

Last edited by Genstabler; 9th Jul 2013 at 09:42.
Genstabler is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 11:47
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: England
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old and clapped out!!

On a F4J detachment to Bitburg (Canadian F15s) we had to rob the Gateguard F4 for a nosewheel hydraulic pipe to get the jet back in the air!!
Four Types is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 12:28
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
On a F4J detachment to Bitburg (Canadian F15s).....
Are you sure aboot that, eh?
BEagle is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 12:34
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the Doghouse
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
USAF 36th TFW were at Bitburg......
sled dog is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 16:29
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: East Yorkshire
Age: 75
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Just out of curiosity I wonder how many flying hours the lead GAF Phantom had when it was retired. I seem to remember the RAF aircraft were around 5000 hours.

Walbut
walbut is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 16:49
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rhino Power wrote

Don't seem to remember that happening for UK F-4s... Unless of course you were a scrap merchant!
Phantom FGR.2, serial XV474, was in private hands after retirement. It was owned by The Old Flying Machine Company and could still taxi. The rumour was that the OFMC was intending to fly her on the civilian register? XV474 was later taken over by the Imperial War Museum as a static display.

This unique piece of video shows Mark Hanna giving his sister Sarah "a ride" in the OFMC's Phantom, namely a fast taxi, along runway 24 at Duxford, watched by their father Ray.
'Embedding disabled by request' See following link.

TEEEJ is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 19:54
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of this, and not one decent photo!
cuefaye is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.