Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Last flying Vulcan to stay in the skies

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Last flying Vulcan to stay in the skies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jun 2013, 21:54
  #41 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Just did a talk tonight at an historical society. I think the inescapable truth of deterrence is not 'if is could have worked' but if the other guy 'thought it could have worked.'

I wonder if Black Buck could have been avoided if a different approach had been taken. Rather than demonstrating that Buenos Aries was within range, stating that it was. Let them work out that two Vulcans at ASI was a militarily ineffective force but that two nuclear bombers . . .

Would it have worked?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 22:16
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: UK East Anglia
Age: 66
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PN,
I hope your talk went well. Got to keep reminding folks of our heritage.

As a youngster (55) I remember the Black Buck quite well from the time. I was busy modifying Chinooks with Ex Vulcan kit but know some of our EWAU team were engaged fitting Carousel and other stuff for the mission. 30 years after I have just finished reading the book.

I always thought that they should have dropped something, even if it was just a leaflet, on Brunos Aeries to send that message. Not sure what the air defence picture would have been like but Withers and his crew were bold enough to make it through to Stanley through quite a storm. Then others went back to do it again once the hornets nest had had a poke.

The fact that you guys never had to drop a bomb on USSR was a success. You could have had you had too. As a result I made it to 55 without growing up speaking German, as could so easily have been the case had your predecessors not done what they did in 45. Thank you.
dragartist is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 22:22
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the Vulcan had been tasked with dropping something
on BA, would it have got through and of course back to
somewhere safe ?

Anyone know what the air defenses were like ?
500N is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 04:51
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Age: 66
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the Vulcan had been tasked with dropping something
on BA, would it have got through and of course back to
somewhere safe ?

Anyone know what the air defenses were like ?
From a polictial point of view better results would have come from bombing one of the bases been used to attack the task force. Bombing BA would have been counter productive.
Dysonsphere is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 06:13
  #45 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The whole point about deterrence is not would we think it would get through but would they think it could?

Of course a country set on invasion - Argentina and Iraq - clearly did not think things through.

I know Ted Heath was pilloried for visiting Sadam in 1991 but I always thought he should have taken some air power videos with him.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 15:10
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mos Eisley
Age: 48
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the Lightning. Apart from anything else, it actually did the job it was designed for, intercepting intruding Soviet bombers/recon aircraft. With no disrespect to any ex V force crews, the Vulcan, Victor or Valiant never dropped a bomb over a Soviet country, unless you boys know better
If the Lightning was designed for waving at Bears then why did it carry missiles? We didn't win the Battle of Britain by waving at Heinkels. The only RAF fighter which did the job it was designed for in recent years was the Phantom.
OafOrfUxAche is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 15:32
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
...the Lightning. Apart from anything else, it actually did the job it was designed for, intercepting intruding Soviet bombers/recon aircraft.
Small point, but without a Valiant or later a Victor tanker waiting in a convenient location, the pilot of said Lightning would have been swimming home from somewhere North of the Orkneys!

Neither of those types have been preserved in flying condition (Teasin' Tina aside!) which is a shame, but I'm still really pleased to see 588 around the shows to represent the cold war period.
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 21:35
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fly by on the way home?

So there we were, family and friends having a barbie and a few beers on a quiet Sunday afternoon when the surreal sound and sight of a Vulcan at low level with its gear down gave rise to a great deal of exitement!

I guess they were on the way home after displaying at Cosford but does anyone know why there was a low level gear down pass over north Derbyshire on Sunday afternoon?
Captain Radar.... is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 06:54
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,850
Received 329 Likes on 115 Posts
To have Bombed a city such as Buenos Aires would have been a ridiculous escalation which would undoubtedly have attracted international outrage and condemnation.

Overflying the city at low level in the early hours, to attact a military aerodrome would have been risky, but less provocative:


About a 13 hr round trip, which would certainly have needed AAR support.

Last edited by BEagle; 12th Jun 2013 at 06:55.
BEagle is online now  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 08:27
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
To have Bombed a city such as Buenos Aires would have been a ridiculous escalation which would undoubtedly have attracted international outrage and condemnation.

My sister would have been pretty fed up too, as would my niece and her family, as they were living in BA at the time (niece still does), along with tens of thousands of other Brits. I'm pretty sure this option wouldn't have been considered, even for a moment.
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 08:59
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 187
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If we had a flying example of everyones favourite aircraft there would be more historic ones flying than operational! Put them in a museum, saving the money, which can be better spent on the museum, rather than turning AVTUR into water!
haltonapp is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 12:43
  #52 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I never said bomb BA. I said convince them that we COULD. Then it up to a rational opponent to realise that we MIGHT.

The problem in both Argentina and Iraq is that the leadership was irrational and convinced that we would not try retake the FI or eject them from Iraq.

In both cases the wrong signals had obviously been given and the deterrent had therefore failed.

Only by maintaining the mystique of the nuclear fist can deterrence work. It was maintained throughout the Cold War, largely maintained by the US, but given additional credence with British and French deterrent forces.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 12:45
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,850
Received 329 Likes on 115 Posts
Only by maintaining the mystique of the nuclear fist can deterrence work. It was maintained throughout the Cold War, largely maintained by the US, but given additional credence with British and French deterrent forces.
Perhaps with regards to the Soviet Union. But against Argentina? Anyone suggesting that should be sectioned....

Last edited by BEagle; 12th Jun 2013 at 12:46.
BEagle is online now  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 15:10
  #54 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
BEagle, as for use, yes, but from the Mouse that Roared they might know we know they know we know wouldn't, but are they sure we know they know?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 15:46
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,121
Received 2,959 Likes on 1,263 Posts
It was maintained throughout the Cold War, largely maintained by the US, but given additional credence with British and French deterrent forces.
And all held together with a good share of the worlds output of broom handles, plastic sheeting for the use off and bodge tape.


..

Last edited by NutLoose; 12th Jun 2013 at 15:47.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 18:02
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swindonshire
Posts: 2,007
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator
BEagle, as for use, yes, but from the Mouse that Roared they might know we know they know we know wouldn't, but are they sure we know they know?

1:55 - 2:18...
Archimedes is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2013, 11:35
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LONGEVITY

Right behind you, BEags
Back to the original point, RR are baulking at continuing to certify the elderly Olympus engines. Think about it - if one blows up, who will carry the can? Also the undercarriage has a very finite life. The V-bombers weren't built to last for 50 years.
Flatiron is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2013, 16:46
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Age: 66
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also the undercarriage has a very finite life.
No prob swap the gear for a museum one that dosnt fly, just get the spaere set reconditioned.
Dysonsphere is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2013, 17:19
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bury St. Edmunds
Age: 64
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flatiron, how is it that RR haven't stopped all of the other vintage ac that are powered by RR engines such as the Merlin, Griffen, Goblin, Derwent not to mention older aircraft such as the Fury (Hawker) and Hind?

What's so special about an Olympus when compared with say an Avon in a Hunter?

MB
Madbob is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2013, 19:39
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bin it - it swallows to much. The project achieved what it set out to do, admirably, but I feel that it's now a gravy train for some. Other projects are now more deserving of public cash, and they'll help to invigorate the airshow scene. IMHO that is.
cuefaye is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.