Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

America's other arms procurement programme

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

America's other arms procurement programme

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Mar 2013, 23:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,021
Received 2,900 Likes on 1,242 Posts
America's other arms procurement programme

Blimey, you couldn't make it up.

Buying un-American: Bribery Case Spotlights DoD’s Covert Effort To Obtain Foreign Weapons | Defense News | defensenews.com



But the rest of the operations continued, though U.S. businessmen were now skittish. Here’s one effort that proceeded: a multipronged effort to obtain a supersonic, sea-skimming anti-ship missile the Russians call the Moskit, or 3M80. (NATO calls it the SS-N-22 “Sunburn.” The U.S. was interested in obtaining both the original Russian version and an adaptation which the Russians were selling around the world.)

He says he worked above board, dealing with an office in the Russian military. It was a time of peace when no one thought the Russians and the Americans would be at war directly, so the Russians, he says, were willing to even send over 10 technicians to help demonstrate the missile and the American scientists could figure out what worked.

Suddenly, something went wrong. It turned out there was another mission underway, this one a covert operation to acquire the very same missile system. A major with the GRU, the Russian foreign intelligence agency, called him to tell him things were going sour.

Last edited by NutLoose; 6th Mar 2013 at 23:17.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2013, 13:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,221
Received 408 Likes on 254 Posts
Actually, that isn't all that uncommon.

Stovepiping in government arms, particularly in a large government like the US, is a hazard of the business. Various departments share some info and other they may not. Also, if the objectives of a given department are different than the other, based on function, what may seem an obvious fit to an uninterested third party may not be so obvious to those inside both stove pipes.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.