Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Dambusters latest

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Dambusters latest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Mar 2013, 10:52
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ask somebody not in the RAF to name an RAF Squadron, and if they could name any at all, it would be 617. Makes perfect sense to keep it.

To be honest, I think I would struggle to think of more than three off the top of my head - 617Sqn, 1Sqn and 47Sqn - after that I'm guessing!

Last edited by Trim Stab; 4th Mar 2013 at 10:54.
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 12:11
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What does it matter? There's only going to be six FJ squadrons (per AVM Bagwell), so their identities are really by-the-by. May as well call them 801-806 Naval Air Squadrons, and put the other few ISTAR, AT & SH squadrons in the Army and have done with it.

Even as an ex-soldier, it gives me no pleasure to point this out, but really, what's the point of it all? The viability of the RAF as a stand alone force is rapidly diminishing, and the headshed doesn't seem to be able to do anything about it.
As ex-raf I agree.

I'd just start renumbering from 1 upwards until all sqns are accounted for. Might even make double figures.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 12:40
  #23 (permalink)  
sp6
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Ask somebody not in the RAF to name an RAF Squadron, and if they could name any at all, it would be......."


633 Squadron

bit pish but the music is fab.........

I think all remaining RAF Squadrons should start with a 6. Just like the Navy, with an 8. Like MI5 & MI6 it brings an air of mystery as to what happened to 1,2,3,4......
sp6 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 13:12
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Livingston, Scotland
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Willard Whyte
As ex-raf I agree.

I'd just start renumbering from 1 upwards until all sqns are accounted for. Might even make double figures.
There was a fascinating lineup on the static display at the 2012 Leuchars Airshow: one aircraft from each of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 squadrons. Three Typhoons, a Tornado, a Hawk and a Sentinel, which rather disrupted the visual flow of the line...
Kluseau is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 13:20
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by sp6
I think all remaining RAF Squadrons should start with a 6.
Plenty of room in the 651+ block, and it'll make assimilation all the easier after 01-Apr-18.
diginagain is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 13:21
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Local newspaper today
First of new generation of fast jets could be based in Scotland - so where does that leave RAF Marham - News - Eastern Daily Press
Ronald Reagan is online now  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 13:40
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swindonshire
Posts: 2,007
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by diginagain
Plenty of room in the 651+ block, and it'll make assimilation all the easier after 01-Apr-18.

How so? By making the personnel of the RAF's new attack helicopter force feel a little happier?
Archimedes is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 14:53
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
RAF Sutton Craddock

Last edited by Roadster280; 4th Mar 2013 at 14:54.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 14:55
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swindonshire
Posts: 2,007
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
633? RAF Sutton Craddock (in reality RAF Bovingdon).

Have I mentioned that I probably need to get out a bit more?
Archimedes is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 15:15
  #30 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Norfolk?

If we have Typhoon and Dave, with Dave at Lossie, what indeed about Marham post 2019? I thought the Tornado was due to remain in service till 2025 but 2019 was posited over the weekend.

Marham would be very handy for the Thetford training areas
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 15:15
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Having read the report on the Eastern Daily Press link it does appear that this MP has jumped straight to conclusion, there is no way Typhoons and F35s will be co-located at Lossiemouth. Perhaps there'll be some way of moving 617 sqn from Lossiemouth to Marham? hmmmmmmmmmmmmm! Who knows.


R.A.F. Bovingdon, now H.M.P. The Mount.

FB

Last edited by Finningley Boy; 4th Mar 2013 at 15:22.
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 15:49
  #32 (permalink)  
sp6
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thinking beyond JSF, and taking FR20 into account, the Aviation Arm of the HSBC/Kia/Samsung/Huywai Sponsored English Defence Forces will be UAV's flown by reservists.

So the remaining Squadrons will be 600, 602, 603, 612 etc

oh sorry 602, 603 and 612 are Scottish so they will get RBS sponsored r/c electric motors re-charged by wind energy whereas the affluent English forces will have glo-plug two strokes using Ethanol imported from Russia and Brazil.


(it has been a long day....)
sp6 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 18:26
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South East of Penge
Age: 74
Posts: 1,792
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
As ex-raf I agree. Willard

So do I . As one of a proud Halton, Cranwell family going back to the 30's, sadly I doubt if the R.A.F. will make it much beyond its Century.

Arguably, there is surely now no further justification for an independent Air Force. The death knell came initially with the loss of holding the Nation's " Independent" nuclear deterrent.
What is left now that is not direct support to the other Forces and therefore arguably should not be directly subordinated to them?
"Air Defence of the U.K." hardly bears serious examination as justification for continued further independencce.
We are back to pre-1918.
Trenchard would turn in his grave.

Last edited by Haraka; 4th Mar 2013 at 18:29.
Haraka is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 19:33
  #34 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Haraka
What is left now that is not direct support to the other Forces and therefore arguably should not be directly subordinated to them?
"Air Defence of the U.K." hardly bears serious examination as justification for continued further independence.
As Air Defence of the UK was an RN responsibility . . .

What is not in direct support?

I suppose all assets can be considered useable in direct support so the question is what missions remain that are not in direct support?

Rivet Joint could possibly regain the strategic role enjoyed by the Comets/Nimrods of 51 Sqn.

Would a counter air campaign be best controlled by a battlefield commander or at a higher level with a specialist air advisor?

Interdiction, is it still a viable role or would the battlefield commander want to retain the assets?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 21:42
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My choice for the F35 would be 1208sqn. From a time when Lossie last had a maritime wing of two great squadrons. One still survives and one lost out to 6 foot spit.

If it fell to a current SQN it should be 12sqn. 12 May 1940 the SQN was awarded two VC's for their fatal raid. By keeping 12sqn as well as FO Garland and Sgt Gray the third member of the crew LAC Renyolds ( who received no award ) will be honoured.
turbroprop is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 07:59
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator
Marham would be very handy for the Thetford training areas
And it will still be in the UK after Scotland separates.
Courtney Mil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.