Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Watchdog Slams USAF on F-22 Crash Report

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Watchdog Slams USAF on F-22 Crash Report

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Feb 2013, 11:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,675
Received 1,793 Likes on 806 Posts
Watchdog Slams USAF on F-22 Crash Report

Search engine is playing up else I'd have put this in the old thread.

Pentagon Watchdog Slams Air Force for Blaming Stealth Jet Failure on Pilot

The U.S. Air Force unfairly blamed one of its top pilots for the crash that killed him, according to the Pentagon’s in-house watchdog, rather than the malfunctioning oxygen systems on his stealth jet.

On Nov. 10, 2010, an Air Force F-22 Raptor stealth fighter piloted by Capt. Jeffrey Haney plunged into the ground in Alaska. Haney died instantly. The Air Force’s official Accident Investigation Board (AIB) investigation (.pdf) a year later accused the young pilot of losing control of his $377 million F-22. But it also admitted that the breathable-air system on Haney’s jet malfunctioned, with possible effects including oxygen deprivation, impaired judgment and even unconsciousness — symptoms collectively known as “hypoxia.”

On Monday, the Defense Department Inspector General called out the Air Force for blaming Haney. The Air Force, it said, pointed a finger at the deceased pilot without adequate evidence and without fully taking into account the possible effects of the failed oxygen gear — problems with which have been found to affect all 180 or so Raptors going back years. “The AIB Statement of Opinion regarding the cause of the mishap was not supported by the facts,” the inspector general states in its official report. (.pdf)..............

The Pentagon inspector general’s report is a powerful blow in Haney’s defense against an Air Force eager to protect the tattered fragments of the F-22′s once-stellar reputation. But it’s not the final word. The Air Force issued a rebuttal to the watchdog office that basically rejects the criticism. “The Air Force found that the AIB President’s Statement of Opinion regarding the cause of the mishap was supported by clear and convincing evidence and he exhausted all available investigative leads,” the flying branch contends.

The stealth jet blame game isn’t over.
ORAC is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 12:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,307
Received 556 Likes on 226 Posts
When you have Pilots refusing to fly the Airplane, when others refuse assignment to the aircraft.....the latest greatest whiz bang warplane in the USAF Fleet....you know something is seriously wrong.

Then when the Air Force does a major refit of the O2 system....as a result of the problems.....but conveniently skips over that in their findings and lays the crash on the head of the dead Pilot.....there is something wrong that is more worrisome than just the technical problem with the aircraft.
SASless is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 13:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Age: 60
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This smelled from Day One.

Why in the world, especially in the modern, digital, everything is out there, age would USAF leadership try to pin this on pilot error?

Obviously, to save money and/or their post-USAF board memberships at various firms.

Sends quite a message to the youngsters about leadership and who has got their backs when it all goes south.
brickhistory is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 13:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,850
Received 333 Likes on 116 Posts
For once I am in total agreement with both brickhistory and SASless!
BEagle is online now  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 14:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,684
Received 72 Likes on 46 Posts
All it needed was a length of coloured cord with a `woggle`on the end, attached to the emergency oxygen ring-pull...cost ,about $5...
sycamore is online now  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 15:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,307
Received 556 Likes on 226 Posts
Careful you don't get carried away now Beags......who knows where this will lead if you do! We might find you holed up in the Alamo with us here.
SASless is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 15:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,850
Received 333 Likes on 116 Posts
Thuh hell ya will, pilgrim!

BEagle is online now  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 16:03
  #8 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,876
Received 64 Likes on 19 Posts
Why in the world, especially in the modern, digital, everything is out there, age would USAF leadership try to pin this on pilot error?
Dead pilots can't argue back or call out the career liars who stand to lose so much if their malfeasance or incompetence is exposed. Don't expect career officers to sacrifice themselves when some poor slob has already done it for them.
Two's in is online now  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 16:09
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Age: 60
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, that was my point.

A conveniently dead pilot is no longer a good defence for poor and/or incompetent leadership.

Sweeping it under the rug is just not an option in today's world.


edited to add: As for BEagle gaining entrance to the Alamo, I want to see some legal documents and at least two references.

Before blackballing him.

We do have standards after all.

Last edited by brickhistory; 13th Feb 2013 at 16:10.
brickhistory is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.