Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Nuclear Tests

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Feb 2013, 20:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,447
Received 1,603 Likes on 735 Posts
Nuclear Tests

Relates to the threads reference Canberra/Valiant etc

I bet none of them went through what this guy did.From the latest issue of Smithsonian Air & Space. Sorry for copying, but hopefully it will persuade a few to sign up for a subscription.






Link to the online article.

Last edited by ORAC; 4th Feb 2013 at 15:14.
ORAC is online now  
Old 2nd Feb 2013, 20:51
  #2 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I recall the story of another pilot, maybe the same one, who was involved with 21 tests.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2013, 20:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Very brave, if this was voluntary. Strange, flying to "one-tenth of a second accuracy" and the weapon might be 45seconds early!?

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2013, 23:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Planet Claire
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This guy must have balls of (probably radioactive) steel.

Respect.
AtomKraft is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2013, 12:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,068
Received 2,939 Likes on 1,252 Posts
A late old family friend was stationed on the islands during the tests, he was telling me they were issued goggles and told to face away, he said he could see the skeletons of all of those in the rows behind him, after the blast he said what perturbed him most was the fact that the toothpaste in the NAAFI shop had all burst their caps and squirted everywhere, he said they also noticed all the land crabs that used to scoot at the signs of movement would walk into people having been blinded by the blast, similarly the NAAFI cats were blinded as well.

Still a lot better than the way we treated the Aboriginies.

Last edited by NutLoose; 3rd Feb 2013 at 12:18.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2013, 13:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: UK East Anglia
Age: 66
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Op Grapple

I have just finished reading a great book on the subject. Operation Grapple. Think it came from Pen and Sword. Lent it out can't remember who too. probablly never get it back.
dragartist is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2013, 17:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southwater
Age: 73
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"Whether the overexposure contributed to the life-threatening Melanoma I developed seven months later, I'll never know".

I think that's a given - shirley?
RedhillPhil is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2013, 22:29
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well worth a look at the Castle Bravo shot that killed a few Japanese fishermen; the bang was significantly more efficient than expected.

Be interesting to see if the v bombers could have escaped the blast after lofting their thermonuclear loads; can't imagine the v bomber was the most manoeuvrable post loft.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2013, 02:19
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A Fine City
Age: 57
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
OnceaPilot

The H-bomb test he is referring to was most likely Redwing Cherokee, the first air dropped US H-bomb test, which was dropped from a B-52. The aircraft crew misidentified the aim point and dropped the weapon (a 3 megaton Mk 17) in the wrong place. I do recall reading an article by a B-47 pilot who was involved that test that their crew realised as soon as the weapon had been released that they were way too close to air zero and had to make an extreme manoeuvre (of a B-47) to get as far away as they could. Though they survived, the B-47 suffered extensive damage from the thermal effects and blast. There are a couple of videos kicking around on the internet showing the de-classified film of the effects on aircraft used on these test (the one covering the aircraft is below).


Last edited by MAINJAFAD; 4th Feb 2013 at 02:24.
MAINJAFAD is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2013, 07:04
  #10 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by VinRouge
Be interesting to see if the v bombers could have escaped the blast after lofting their thermonuclear loads; can't imagine the v bomber was the most manoeuvrable post loft.
We didn't loft as such but did release in the climb with pitch angles between 12 and 15 degrees depending on the particular engines fitted. The standard release height was 10,500 feet followed by a 47 deg bank turn through 140 deg and still climbing. I have papers showing the lowest heights for weapons function but increasing risk.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2013, 07:40
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,823
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
We didn't loft as such but did release in the climb with pitch angles between 12 and 15 degrees depending on the particular engines fitted.
Fortunately that suicidal technique had been binned by the time I flew the Vulcan (1977); the only attack option we used was low-level laydown.
BEagle is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2013, 14:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Well, BEags, at least that suicidal technique was replaced by a completely safe, non-suicidal technique of flying around at low level with the blinds closed.

Last edited by Courtney Mil; 4th Feb 2013 at 14:53.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2013, 15:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,068
Received 2,939 Likes on 1,252 Posts
It was all suicide, when you look at Chernobyl and how far that reached, we’d all be dead once couple had been dropped in Europe, either that or sterile. No one would have won.

Last edited by NutLoose; 4th Feb 2013 at 15:11.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2013, 15:22
  #14 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,447
Received 1,603 Likes on 735 Posts
Another article by the same pilot about ejecting from an F-104 in a downward firing seat. He finishes by stating that someone up there must like him. I ain't too sure.....

.......Using all my remaining strength, I pulled the parachute’s top shroud lines and stopped my pendulum swing almost directly under the canopy. The ground was racing toward me, and before I could get turned around to face downwind, I hit the ground rotating. I landed in what had been Pancho Barnes’Happy Bottom Riding Club dump and was dragged for 40 yards on my back through broken glass and tin cans until my chute got hung up on a yucca tree.

The aircraft went in five miles short of the runway at Edwards. I was one happy aviator, even though my flight suit was torn and covered with blood and sand, I had cracked several vertebrae in my lower back, an air police pickup truck almost ran over me, and a doctor on his first day at the base hospital and a pediatrician on his first rescue helicopter ride dropped me from the stretcher a couple of times...............
ORAC is online now  
Old 4th Feb 2013, 15:53
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fortunately that suicidal technique had been binned by the time I flew the Vulcan (1977); the only attack option we used was low-level laydown.
Did that mean flying over the target, in range of any weapon available? I know the recent GW1 thread highlighted that GR1s overflying the target with JP233 actually had better survival than those lofting bombs further out, but they were a lot smaller than a Vulcan.

I guess it was not the preferred attack method, but without a standoff weapon like Blue Steel and Skybolt we didn't have many options and high level had been proven to be dangerous?

Were there any estimates on success rates for low-level laydown V's loft or was it largely irrelevant as it would have effectively been end ex for everyone?

It sounds like the SSBNs were our only credible strategic response after the late 60's.
Ivan Rogov is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2013, 17:29
  #16 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
IR, I am aware of one target where at least 5 aircraft were planned to attack in a short period of time using the 2E attack. It was a given that several would have been destroyed if the first or second got his bomb away.

BEagle, the pop-up escape manoeuvre had something going for it, you were at least 15,000 feet above and 4-5 miles from DGZ. The downside was the expected SA2 impact was pretty close to the time of detonation.

Do you remember the master planning for a laydown attack? Pass the target, extend to about 5-6 miles until the blast wave passed. Then the master stroke. Execute a 180 degree turn, remaining at low level until abeam the target and then max rate climb.

At least if the bomb didn't go the first time it gave you a second chance. It also had you climbing in a scene of greatest devastation.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2013, 17:49
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Red face

Originally Posted by NutLoose
No one would have won.
Nutty, I think that was the whole point of the deterrent.

But the Cold War seems such a waste of money now. We spent all that money on some amazing weapons and then never used them. Shouldn’t we have had a great big nuke party at the end instead of wasting them? It would have saved all those decommissioning costs too. If they’d filmed each drop, it could have built up a magnificent film library for sale to film-makers and made a bit of cash out them all too!

Last edited by Courtney Mil; 4th Feb 2013 at 17:52.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2013, 18:58
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,068
Received 2,939 Likes on 1,252 Posts
I visited Elvington where there is a WE177 propped up against the wall and gave it a satisfying kick.

I was being pragmatic, I think Chernobyl opened the worlds eyes to the fact you couldn't have a limited war.

Last edited by NutLoose; 4th Feb 2013 at 19:01.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2013, 20:15
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Was it green, Nutty? All the ones I saw were green. I wonder why. Perhaps they needed camoflage during their relatively short time of flight.

To be honest, though, there's still a big difference between a reactor explosion like Chernobl and the detination of a realatively small nuke like WE177. The explosion at Chernobl wasn't a nuclear explosion, it was mainly hydrogen and it didn't consume any of the fuel, it just ejected it into the atmosphere. Bombs are a bit different.

That said, a world full of big bombs were always going to make one hell of a mess of the the planet. However, look at how many we've already detonated and the effect we live with today. The thing is, that it may be that a relatively small number of reactor accidents equates to quite a lot of bombs. Both in terms of immediate contamination and legacy.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2013, 20:35
  #20 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The YS2 was green, the same as most other bombs. The WE177B was white probably for better thermal protection once released. The WE177C was probably green for camouflage whilst being carried.

However you might have a point CM.

At one presentation a gentleman, who wore crimson pants or some such, when told that the bomb would impact and the laydown timer start asked:

"What would happen if I sent a man with a satchel charge and blew it up?"

When told there probably wouldn't be time said:

"Well what would happen if I shot it with my gun?"

So there you have it. Britain's nuclear deterrent neutralised by Herr Grubber and his little tank.
Pontius Navigator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.