Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

VC10 - The truth

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

VC10 - The truth

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jan 2013, 20:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VC10 - The truth

OK guys, I've heard all the "now Concorde is grounded it's the fastest passenger aircraft in the world" stuff, but how fast could/can the VC10 fly really? And is it true that it could fly faster than the RAF chaps are allowed to fly it?

It's still beautiful all these years later regardless of the answers to above questions.
Corrona is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 20:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe that the original VC10 type 1100 was limited to Mach 2.5 where as the Type 1664 and Type 1170 are able to achieve constant speeds approaching Mach 3 at altitudes of 84,000 feet
hval is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 20:29
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow that really is fast.
Corrona is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 20:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Corrona,

Glad you don't believe me.

Have you had a look here? It's a wonderful web site.

There is a page that provides the information here

Last edited by hval; 16th Jan 2013 at 20:33.
hval is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 20:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree that it is one of the most beautiful aircraft designed
hval is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 20:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Concorde and the VC-10 ... the two best passenger aircraft shapes to have ever flown IMHO

Last edited by CoffmanStarter; 16th Jan 2013 at 20:37.
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 20:38
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CoffmanStarter,

I agree
hval is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 20:39
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,500
Received 165 Likes on 89 Posts
Rumour has it the 787 'cruised' above M0.9 regularly during testing.
The phrase 'goes like a scalded cat' is probably in poor taste though.
TURIN is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 20:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Westnoreastsouth
Posts: 1,826
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
What is the melting point of plastic ???
longer ron is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 20:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Westnoreastsouth
Posts: 1,826
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
Just to clarify...I was talking about skin heating temp due to speed...nothing to do with electrickery LOL
longer ron is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 21:07
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Longer ron,

Depends on the plastic. "Plastics" are a group of materials that can have vastly differing characteristics. You can get plastics that can maintain their properties in extremely hot temperatures. Polyetherimide (I think that's how you spell it) can be used up to 340°F (170°C) - ish. But that is a special plastic

Last edited by hval; 16th Jan 2013 at 21:08.
hval is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 21:14
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,500
Received 165 Likes on 89 Posts
For the 787 about 100C upsets the engineers.
TURIN is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 21:16
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: UK East Anglia
Age: 66
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I must be blind, I could not see any ref to M2 or M3 or 84k ft in the links. I did fly out of Embakasi (Niarobi) in 1965 in one. then back from Changi in 1970. Did the Washington Saturday run several times in the 80s. recall people saying we were overtaking 747s. Miss BOAC 1954 was the senior steward or what ever they called them at the time. Was Concorde banned from IAD due to noise. My mate who lived at Fairfax Va always new when we had arrived so had the steak in the smoker for when we had cleared customs. VC10 was the noisiest thing flying into IAD at the time. Very strong aircraft. I did some design work on the Super tankers when it was found they had extruded stringers. the assumption had been they were the same bent tin as the standard. The original RAF ones had a wet fin. I went down to Weybridge just before the design office moved to Chadderton (may have been Woodford for a while). I miss those days - rose coloured specs!
dragartist is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 21:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,844 Likes on 1,215 Posts
He was joking about speeds, read the follow on posts

Yup the RAF ones were standard fuselage with super engines and wings, plus a wet fin, the tail plane was a bit bigger than a Hunters main planes if I remember correctly. Noisy outside even with noise abatement, but quiet inside.

Last edited by NutLoose; 16th Jan 2013 at 21:26.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 21:46
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dragartist,

NutLoose is correct. I was joking. I promise.

I have a really crap sense of humour. I admit it. My wife tells me that I never grew up past the age of seven. I reckon seven and a half.
hval is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 21:48
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Westnoreastsouth
Posts: 1,826
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
Sorry HVAL...plastic - as in plastic pig - which could of course be a reliant 3 wheeler or a GR5/7/9/10...or indeed a Boing Nightmare liner
longer ron is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 22:59
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Blighty (Nth. Downs)
Age: 77
Posts: 2,107
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Can't speak for the military birds. For what it's worth, on the Standard 1103s and the 1109 (to which spec the prototype, G-ARTA, was modified for airline service) Mmo was M0.86 (true) = M0.886 (indicated). I don't know Vd. On entry into service with BUA in 1964-65, they cruised them at Mmo, with the overspeed bell often ringing intermittently in gusty conditions. By 1971, as BCAL, we normally cruised at M0.835 (true). After the 1972 fuel crisis, we were down to M0.82.

The 1103 was a Standard VC10 with main-deck cargo door and what was referred to as a "super" wing, with Kuchemann (droop-snoot) wing tips, to enable cruise at up to FL430. (BOAC's Standards were limited to FL410.) Unlike the RAF transports, there was no APU, a dry fin, and the engines were as for the Standard VC10. The 1109 was similar to the 1103, but no cargo door.

G-ASIX, which had cracked its tailplane bullet in an upset over Mendoza in about 1972, was sold to the Sultan of Oman in 1974 as his personal jet. He donated her to the Brooklands Museum around 1989, where she can be visited. That cockpit...
Chris Scott is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 23:54
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southwater
Age: 73
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm more than happy to bow down to greater knowledge. I only speak as someone with an interest but...
I had a pal many moons ago who's Pa was a Trident captain. He (Ian's Pa) claimed that the Trident 2 was the fastest airliner and indeed I can remember reading the same in the Guiness book of records circa 1972.
Mind you, his Pa also told me that every aircraft landed bu a Trident had a controlled crash. He also told me that they were a bugger to get off the ground(?)
RedhillPhil is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2013, 01:39
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,844 Likes on 1,215 Posts
Brooklands got it earlier than 89 as I came out in 89 but we took a search to coat it with some fancy resin, so it must of arrived 87 88 ish, the throttles had seized when we were there. Had a nice tour round what was a new museum followed by taking the RAF Sherpa round some of the track, got quite far up the embankment too
NutLoose is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2013, 06:03
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Scotland
Age: 72
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We used to refer to the Tridents as Quadrants at Edinburgh as when fully laden they had to have the extra thrust from the APU to get off the ground...
OldHunter is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.