Upward Falling Payload
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
Upward Falling Payload
Ares: Kraken Wakes - DARPA's Deep-Sea Sleepers
Arguing it is costly and complex to send large numbers of warships to forward operating areas - and that the energy and logistics needed to deploy lower-cost unmanned systems over oceanic distances limits their usefulness - DARPA has come with another idea. That idea is to pre-deploy "deep-ocean nodes" in forward areas years in advance. These would be commanded from a safe stand-off distance to launch to the surface and release waterborne or airborne unmanned systems to disperse and provide ISR or "non-lethal effects" over a wide area in contested environments.
The program is called Upward Falling Payload (UFP), and DARPA plans to brief industry at a proposers' day on Jan 25 in Washington, DC.
The UFP system would, the notice says, comprise three elements: "The ‘payload' which executes waterborne or airborne applications after being deployed to the surface; the UFP ‘riser' which provides pressure-tolerant encapsulation and launch (ascent) of the payload; and the communications which triggers the UFP riser to launch."
DARPA plans a multi-phase effort to demonstrate the UFP systems. Details are sparse, but the program sounds like it could build on previous efforts such as Lockheed Martin Skunk Work's Cormorant submarine-launched UAV (pictured above), which was cancelled in 2008. Cormorant was to be a high-performance UAV, but there has been other work on the encapsulated, underwater launch of small UAVs............
Arguing it is costly and complex to send large numbers of warships to forward operating areas - and that the energy and logistics needed to deploy lower-cost unmanned systems over oceanic distances limits their usefulness - DARPA has come with another idea. That idea is to pre-deploy "deep-ocean nodes" in forward areas years in advance. These would be commanded from a safe stand-off distance to launch to the surface and release waterborne or airborne unmanned systems to disperse and provide ISR or "non-lethal effects" over a wide area in contested environments.
The program is called Upward Falling Payload (UFP), and DARPA plans to brief industry at a proposers' day on Jan 25 in Washington, DC.
The UFP system would, the notice says, comprise three elements: "The ‘payload' which executes waterborne or airborne applications after being deployed to the surface; the UFP ‘riser' which provides pressure-tolerant encapsulation and launch (ascent) of the payload; and the communications which triggers the UFP riser to launch."
DARPA plans a multi-phase effort to demonstrate the UFP systems. Details are sparse, but the program sounds like it could build on previous efforts such as Lockheed Martin Skunk Work's Cormorant submarine-launched UAV (pictured above), which was cancelled in 2008. Cormorant was to be a high-performance UAV, but there has been other work on the encapsulated, underwater launch of small UAVs............
Last edited by ORAC; 13th Jan 2013 at 09:27.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,111
Received 2,953 Likes
on
1,259 Posts
No probs Muff..
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I were an American taxpayer I would feel distinctly uneasy about the funding directed towards an organisation who can so completely ignore the basic definitions of 'fall' all of which seem to have a downward component to them.
Upward Rising Payload would be more correct
BTW, great to see Skydiver even if that music is a disgraceful replacement for the original Barry Gray? soundtrack
and some childhood memories; Lt Gay Ellis getting changed. Gives that bint from BoB a run for her money.
Upward Rising Payload would be more correct
BTW, great to see Skydiver even if that music is a disgraceful replacement for the original Barry Gray? soundtrack
and some childhood memories; Lt Gay Ellis getting changed. Gives that bint from BoB a run for her money.
Last edited by Kitbag; 13th Jan 2013 at 19:27.
That idea is to pre-deploy "deep-ocean nodes" in forward areas years in advance. These would be commanded from a safe stand-off distance to launch to the surface and release waterborne or airborne unmanned systems to disperse and provide ISR or "non-lethal effects" over a wide area in contested environments.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Going back to the OP, ignoring any minor technical difficulties in achieving a viable capability and limitations in the number of systems deployed (it is a cost saving measure after all) this concept pre-supposes that military planners will be able to correctly identify potential areas of conflict perhaps decades in advance. Has this happened in the past?
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
Oh yeah - Europe, Mediterranean, Gulf, Jaapan, China Seas, Malaccas.
The choke and vital points haven't changed in centuries.
The choke and vital points haven't changed in centuries.