Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

A330 tankers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jan 2013, 07:39
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stamford
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the baskets are ringed with lights so power of some sort is available
I always thought they were beta lights. Putting power in close proximity to fuel vapour would seem like a bad plan.
Stuff is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2013, 07:40
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 859
Received 49 Likes on 23 Posts
From what I've seen, the baskets are ringed with lights
I think you will find that the lights in question are Beta Lights and there is no power at the drogue end.
Saintsman is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2013, 08:01
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,158
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by newt
Once again we have a very expensive aircraft that cannot complete it's primary role on entry into service!!

Nothing changes then

Bring me the whisky bottle! Oh no it's still January and I promised not to drink all month!!
Originally Posted by The Times
.....Voyager remains on schedule to meet its air-to-air refuelling in-service-date of May 2014.....
Am I missing something?
just another jocky is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2013, 08:25
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Am I missing something?
Yep. AAR ITS was 2008/09 originally
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2013, 08:26
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 275 Likes on 111 Posts
Beta lights are so last century! The latest drogues use self-powered illumination.

BBadanov, I'm fully aware that AiM has lost 2 booms during manufacturer's A330MRTT testing - hardly a secret as both cases were soon reported in the media.

If you think that RAAF OT&E has 'gone well', I'd hate to know what 'not gone well' would amount to under your definition.....

But yes, perhaps unsurprisingly the KC-30A and Voyager have indeed proved that a grey-painted A330 works very well in the Air Transport role...even without EROPS clearance.
BEagle is online now  
Old 7th Jan 2013, 09:26
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Among these dark Satanic mills
Posts: 1,197
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why can the basket not be given more intelligence
15 months isn't very long to develop, test and produce an intelligent basket...
TorqueOfTheDevil is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2013, 09:29
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Witney UK
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The stability of the drogue depends on several factors. The length of the hose, the size of the drogue canopy, the speed of the tanker, the setting of the fitting of the pod to the wing, the amount of fuel in the hose, to name but a few. I still wonder if the right people are trying to fix it.

Last edited by Art Field; 7th Jan 2013 at 09:30.
Art Field is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2013, 09:54
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I think you will find that the lights in question are Beta Lights
Used to be clear bicycle rear lights powered by Sturmey Archer bicycle generators in my day. They took off the wheel that rode against the tyre and replaced it with a vane thingy.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2013, 11:56
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bed
Posts: 339
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
More concerning is the length of time to procure these aircraft - it's only a modified A330 after all - does anyone have an idea on which year it was first mooted? about 1995-98ish?- granted there are technical issues to be overcome. How many former senior officers (esp ex Air Cmnd and BZN) have taken a significant salary to attempt to provide/advise on this hugely expensive PFI gravytrain? I do hope a good investigative journalist starts to ask the right questions and looks at the timescale and waste this thing has already taken to try and provide a basic capability.
sangiovese. is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2013, 12:47
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 431
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A330 has gone well during RAAF OT&E with Classic Hornet (F/A-18A+) and the Super Hornet (F/A-18F).
Super Hornet has not conducted AAR with RAAF KC30 (yet).
ftrplt is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2013, 13:37
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 275 Likes on 111 Posts
sangiovese, once the finance people had finally agreed the terms of this PFI programme, AirTanker worked as quickly as possible to deliver the service.

However, it is hardly their fault if the aircraft failed to provide an AAR capability sooner. That is an Airbus Military / Cobham issue and one which is surely being progressed with some urgency.

Incidentally, I would certainly hope that there are some experienced ex-senior RAF officers working in the programme, rather than purely commercial and technical people. It's very important to the success of the RAF's future AAR capability that someone with the right background can smell potential BS!

Back to the drogue issue - when you have a long, relatively flexible wing, a long hose and a light drogue, it is highly likely that tuning out divergent oscillations will be very difficult over the entire AAR envelope as specified by the end-user. When tension response is controlled electrically rather than by 'technik durch four springs' as in the Mk32 pod, tweaking the control software is far from simple. So even when any drogue leaks, spinning and stability issues have been resolved, there is still the possibility of hose yo-yo or 'pulsing' behaviour to consider. The hose and drogue might be perfectly acceptable at the heart of the AAR envelope, but would that meet the demands of a customer who has specified a more demanding AAR envelope? Somehow I doubt it...... Because there'd be no guarantee that any urgency would be attached to extending clearance to the entire envelope.

Last edited by BEagle; 7th Jan 2013 at 13:39.
BEagle is online now  
Old 7th Jan 2013, 16:04
  #32 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bourton-on-the-Water
Posts: 1,018
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Well, according to the Airbus Military Press Office at least, the Indians think it's ok. This pinged into the inbox today

Airbus Military A330 MRTT selected by Indian Government

Airbus Military is pleased to confirm that it has been selected by the Government of India as the preferred bidder to supply its A330 MRTT Multi Role Tanker Transport to the Indian Air Force (IAF).


The decision follows a lengthy and thorough selection process including the completion of extensive flight demonstrations in India by the A330 MRTT during which the aircraft refuelled multiple types of IAF fighters and operated from the high-altitude IAF base at Leh.


Detailed negotiations will now begin which it is expected will lead to the award of a final production contract for an envisaged six aircraft in 2013.


Airbus Military CEO Domingo
Ureña Raso said: “We are grateful for the confidence shown in our company by the Government of India and the Indian Air Force, and we appreciate the detailed and fair appraisal of the competing products which they have conducted. This has been a long and tough competition and we are honoured to have been selected.
“We are fully committed to the next stage of the negotiations, and ultimately to providing the IAF with what is unquestionably the most advanced tanker/transport aircraft flying and certified today.”

India ́s selection of the A330 MRTT makes it the fifth nation to commit to the type following Australia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom which have ordered a total of 28 aircraft.



airsound

Last edited by airsound; 7th Jan 2013 at 16:07. Reason: layout
airsound is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.