Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

China buys the Tu22M3 Backfire production line?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

China buys the Tu22M3 Backfire production line?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jan 2013, 16:35
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NW FL
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Doctor Cruces
Goodness knows why the same designation with just a different letter at the end,
You mean like how a GR1 might be a Harrier, Tornado, or Jaguar?
US Herk is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2013, 16:48
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Doctor Cruces
Was confused about the "updating" bit until I flicked to the article. That's a TU-22M Backfire, not a Blinder in the picture. Makes sense now. Goodness knows why the same designation with just a different letter at the end, unless it was developed from the Blinder.

Doc C
Soviet attempt to mislead NATO into thinking it was a merely an updated Blinder rather than a completely new aircraft. The original assumption in the West was that it was designated Tu-26.
TheWestCoast is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2013, 16:54
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the (non) change in designation was really to save face in Russia - the original aircraft looked great but was a bit of a pig, a complete redesign a turned it into a decent bomber but no-one wanted to admit they'd got it wrong to start with

See B-1A & B1B lancer for a similar story
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2013, 21:25
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Scotland
Age: 54
Posts: 279
Received 82 Likes on 23 Posts
Was the Tu-22M not called so by Tupolev to make it initially appear that it was an upgraded design rather than a new aircraft (so that it was more acceptable to the powers in charge, rather than an entirely new design)?
Thrust Augmentation is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2013, 23:01
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: netherlands
Age: 56
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Tu22M entered service in 1972 already, 370 were build. First flight 1969. So a Concorde generation aircraft. A remarkable technological achievement by the Tupolev engineers IMO. Non were exported in the USSR tradition of keeping the best equipment for themselves..

Oekraine destroyed theirs as negotiated (11 Tu-160s too)..


Must have hurt the eyes of the Chinese..

Last edited by keesje; 4th Jan 2013 at 11:44. Reason: adding perspective
keesje is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.