Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Ejection... Cutting it fine

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Ejection... Cutting it fine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th December 2012 | 08:39
  #61 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
The tractor picture

118 Squadron - Personnel 002 George Aird
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 4th December 2012 | 09:06
  #62 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,695
Likes: 7,377
From: Peripatetic
He was on finals for an emergency landing at Hatfield, following a double reheat fire warning which occurred about 15 miles North East of Hatfield.
IIRC, the Lightning had a long history of double engine fires caused by fuel pipe failure leading to the accumulation of fuel and fire in the lower rear fuselage.

Several pilots were lost due to the fire burning through the control rods when on finals to land, so the instructions changed so that in the event of double engine fire lights the aircraft was to be held in a safe area until either the lights went and a recovery could be attempted or until fuel exhaustion or loss of control necessitated ejection.
ORAC is online now  
Reply
Old 5th December 2012 | 13:03
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
From: Perth
Another late ejection after running out of options.


Last edited by chute packer; 5th December 2012 at 13:03.
chute packer is offline  
Reply
Old 5th December 2012 | 14:22
  #64 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 977
Likes: 5
From: UK
Five, Torn GR1, ZA607 (on the ground) 23 Aug 91.

Ivor

Last edited by Ivor Fynn; 5th December 2012 at 14:23.
Ivor Fynn is offline  
Reply
Old 5th December 2012 | 17:28
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Luton UK
Indeed many LIghtnings were lost to to reheat bay fires. Main culprit were Frs fuel couplings located in the reheat bays. The control rods were modified from aluminium to stainless steel, giving the pilot a little more time to act before the fire " melted" the rods. Our procedure with any fire, was to climb to an acceptable height to assess the situation, and poop the fire bottles. If the fire was still indicating, MB letdown. The Lightning was notorious for in flight fires.
Lightning5 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th December 2012 | 07:14
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 2
From: down south
The Lightning was notorious for in flight fires.
Was it ever!!
Lightning Mate is offline  
Reply
Old 6th December 2012 | 18:05
  #67 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Darlington
Yes, it's all in the boo......as they say over on the Flypast forum
Monsun is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2012 | 09:16
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 18
From: SW England
Often wondered who took that Lightning photo. It obviously wasn't taken by an amateur out with his box Brownie - did there just happen to be a professional with a good camera around. Anyone know?

Thanks for the detail of the accident L-M and for the link BOAC, greenhouses seem to be a popular landing spot post aircraft abandonment (see Edward Fox in The Battle of Britain)!
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2012 | 09:31
  #69 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 26
Likes: 1
From: Lincs
The Lightning photo was taken by a man by the name of Jim Mead. His grandson is a Pprune member but he rarely visits the forum nowadays. Also, Jim's mother was my grandfather's sister. I believe Jim was a very keen photographer who had gone along to the field to take photos of the farmer on his tractor.

JN
Drainpipe is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2012 | 09:38
  #70 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 393
Likes: 27
From: North Kent, UK.
I'm sure someone will be along with a fuller answer, but I read somewhere on the web that the photographer was just starting out as a professional and was asked by the farmer to photograph his new tractor! In those days before quick wind on his next shot was the column of smoke!
mmitch.

Edit: See i knew someone would!

Last edited by mmitch; 7th December 2012 at 09:40.
mmitch is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2012 | 12:10
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Forres
Lucky Hunter ejection

March 1973 scrambled from Chivenor to Hunter ejection south of the field. The aircraft had hit a supporting guy wire of a 537' high TV mast which severed half a wing taking out the aileron causing the aircraft to roll rapidly. The pilot pulled the handle when the aircraft was inverted and luckily the seat fired when aircraft was upright and, mainly due to the ground falling away quite steeply, as the mast is on a hill, the chute deployed and he landed safely. I found him laying, flat on his back, in an aisle in a nearby grocery store where he had managed to limp to with the local shoppers acting like it was quite normal to have a pilot in full flying gear lying in the store!
Oldsarbouy is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2012 | 12:23
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 204
Likes: 41
From: Maryland, USA
Mead/Meads

I can't vouch for the veracity of the source site , but some of the details differ in these accounts:

That Lightning photo [Archive] - PPRuNe Forums
Vzlet is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2012 | 13:20
  #73 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 26
Likes: 1
From: Lincs
We're not expecting the press to be accurate, are we?

At least when the picture was reproduced in the Sunday Express of 13 May 1979 (I have a copy) they spelt his name correctly.

JN

Last edited by Drainpipe; 7th December 2012 at 13:24. Reason: Addition
Drainpipe is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2012 | 17:46
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 18
From: SW England
Thanks for the response Drainpipe and Mitch and some interesting comments on your link Vzlet. I like the one about it being a set-up job!

"Now here's the plan. You get ready with your camera, with the tractor in the foreground. I'll get the old crate into a vertical dive and bang out at 200 feet. It'll make a great snap for the papers - oh and don't forget to put a film in the camera!"

Priceless!
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2012 | 19:05
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 353
From: UK
The large number of fine judgements and no doubt many less fortunate incidents suggest that human judgement is stretched to its limit. Is there now a strong case for an auto-eject system near the ground.

IIRC such a system has been contemplated, even tested; and perhaps in service somewhere?
safetypee is online now  
Reply
Old 7th December 2012 | 19:18
  #76 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Is there now a strong case for an auto-eject system near the ground.
- err....no!

You mean like the French 'auto barrier' that pops up when something crosses the sensors at speed? Proved VERY interesting on a low level runway beat up.

Just imagine settling down at 3'6" and going just a touch lower and.whoops! Another tie.
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2012 | 20:00
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 0
From: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
"Is there now a strong case for an auto-eject system near the ground."


You can imagine a few little happenings as aircraft go through
the Mach Loop or on a low level bombing run !!!
500N is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2012 | 22:10
  #78 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 259
Likes: 2
From: Netherlands


Ejection Decision - A second Too Late! (1981)


Department of Defense
PIN 52563
EJECTION DECISION - A SECOND TOO
LATE
DEVELOPED FOR AIRCREWS WHO FLY AIRCRAFT

Last edited by Stratofreighter; 7th December 2012 at 22:11. Reason: One Youtube-link is enough, three is clearly too much...
Stratofreighter is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2012 | 22:18
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 0
From: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Why has Lightning Mate been banned ?
500N is offline  
Reply
Old 8th December 2012 | 06:20
  #80 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 512
Likes: 50
From: ACT, Australia
was just going to ask that.
Skeleton is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.