Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

China lands jet on first aircraft carrier

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

China lands jet on first aircraft carrier

Old 25th Nov 2012, 10:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Secret base, SW
Posts: 41
China lands jet on first aircraft carrier

BBC News - China lands jet on first aircraft carrier
ian176 is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 11:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 460
Most impressive. A country and indeed military that is on the up and up!
I wonder where they will be 10 and 20 years from now.
Ronald Reagan is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 12:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 362
The Spratly Islands and Taiwan are 2 places I'd bet on!
Jobza Guddun is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 12:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 426
Do my eyes deceive me or does the video show the J-15 taking off without catapult assistance? Surely that's going to have a huge impact on available payload?
Avionker is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 12:25
  #5 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,583
J-15 taking off without catapult assistance
- I'm not sure catapults and ski ramps go together??
BOAC is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 12:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 426
Fair point, but then I didn't think that CTOL and ski jumps went together so well either....

Edit:- A little bit of goggling and it would appear I was wrong, and that the Su-33, if not the the J-15, can indeed take off at max payload using this technique. Every day is a school day.

Last edited by Avionker; 25th Nov 2012 at 12:43.
Avionker is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 13:16
  #7 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,583
Indeed, and I sit in the row behind you. I suppose with the significant increase in T/Wts ratios we see now-a-days, 'CTO' and 'STO' blur a little?
BOAC is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 13:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Posts: 6
Apparently its for Fleet Defence only:-

Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nick

Last edited by NAROBS; 25th Nov 2012 at 13:18.
NAROBS is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 13:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,179
Its like a piece of string.....what IS its max takeoff payload?

Thats something the Russians appeared very desperate to hide during their carrier trip to the Med earlier this year, and I suspect their figure won't be far short of the Chinese one - the aircraft being seemingly related.

I've not seen a single photo or video of an aircraft leaving the Russian carrier with any kind of weapon attached
Milo Minderbinder is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 14:04
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4,693
The Lianing was refurbished purely as a training carrier so payload doesn't come into it.

It is when they start building their own to their specifications is when to forcast their capabilities.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 14:37
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 197
Meh.....we've got a dozen of these and our pilots are smarter.
Temp Spike is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 14:40
  #12 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 86
Posts: 2,206
It is easy to misunderstand the benefits of a ‘ski-jump, or inclined ramp, on a ship.

If you run a car or a bike up one you will fly (remain above the height of the level deck ) for a while even though these vehicles have no lift generating capability.

If you use an aeroplane that has some lift generating capability you will fly for longer even though you may not have lift equal to your weight. In this case if during the time you fly (thanks to the ski-jump) you can accelerate to a speed where lift will equal weight you have completed your takeoff.

So to obtain the advantages of a ski-jump (with any aeroplane) you need two things:

1 A good t/w ratio – very common with many current military aircraft – enabling you to take full advantage of the seconds of flight that the skijump provides.

2 You need to be able to control the aircraft pitch and roll attitude at the (low) ramp exit speed either by good aerodynamics or a reaction control system.
John Farley is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 17:32
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: crewe
Age: 73
Posts: 438
A chinky chockhead
david parry is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 18:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 645
We'd better build two new carriers. I see lots of fun coming up with all those tiny asian rock islands.

Last edited by Kerosene Kraut; 25th Nov 2012 at 18:23.
Kerosene Kraut is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 19:04
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 52
Posts: 1,363
Nice bit of racist language there Dave - charming.
Load Toad is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 21:03
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 259
John F

A rational response from you, as I would expect!! Perhaps unusual for some threads here! But everyone has to start somewhere.

I think that the Chinese efforts are admirable.

Their tentative efforts seem to have worked well. So, well done to them.

Turn the clocks back several years, and I would be more than happy to go on exchange with them and have a go!!

Nice looking boat, nice looking plane, and nice weather.

Why not go for it!!
BomberH is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 23:09
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Whilst not wishing to cross swords with Mr Farley in any way, might I perhaps suggest that a certain small aircraft when sat on its wheels had very little incidence, and that a ski ramp imparted some incidence which got its wings lifting?
mike-wsm is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2012, 00:08
  #18 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,317
If I may....

The Russian carrier operates its Flankers as air defences units and they are moving to smaller and lighter Mig 29s. The current and new Indian vessels are described accordingly as Air Defence Ships, not Strike Carriers.. The Chinese ship is no different. Stobar is the least efficient means of launching fast jets. Our F35 ships will be far more efficient.

I would like to see that video re-run again with with a full war load. Hope they have a good plane guard chopper nearby!
Navaleye is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2012, 00:30
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 71
Posts: 1,938
WOD Significant for Ski Jump

Perhaps WOD overlooked.... Quote from USMC Harrier Test Pilot Art Nalls from:

Harrier Operations on a Ski Jump
by Major Art Nalls, USMC, Naval Aviation News, May – June 1990

http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/back.../1990/mj90.pdf

"...The important difference between a ski jump and a flat deck is that the heavier the aircraft, and the higher the wind over the deck, the greater the advantage of using a ski jump.

The aircraft takeoff performance was so dramatically improved that the heaviest Harrier ever flown from any ship – 31,000 pounds gross weight – was launched from Asturias with only a 400-foot deck run. The 31,000 pounds equals the maximum gross weight capability of the AV-8B. To put this In perspective. a “typical” AV-8B with a close air support ordnance load of full fuel, full water, guns, and 12 MK-82 bombs would weigh only about 29,000 pounds. On a typical 59-degree Fahrenheit day, with 35-knot winds over the deck, this load could be launched from a 300-foot deck run with a 12-degree ski jump. The same ordnance load would require the entire 750-foot flight deck of an LHA...."
SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2012, 00:36
  #20 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 10,016
I wonder where they will be 10 and 20 years from now.
Somewhere north of Brisbane I imagine...
Buster Hyman is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.