Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Prop sychronisers... on the Nimrod???

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Prop sychronisers... on the Nimrod???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Nov 2012, 23:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Prop sychronisers... on the Nimrod???

Can any former Nimrod crew advise why the aeroplane has an engine sychronisation instrument (3 little props, just like on a 4-engines prop aeroplane)? It had Speys!

My mate who flew 1-11s (also Spey bypass turbojets) confirms that didn't have it, but his Vanguard did!
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 01:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: various
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 3 little props helped in synchronising the LP RPM of all the engines. The No 2 engine was the master with the instrument showing if the other engines's LPRPM was faster (prop rotates clockwise) or slower (prop rotates anti-clockwise). The speed of the prop rotation was an indicator of how far away the engine was from having the same LP RPM as the no 2. The reason for this ultimately was to remove an anoint whining type noise that occurred when the engines were not in sync - it was nothing to do with fuel economy etc as I'm sure some posters will claim. The instrument itself was a hangover from de Havilland who used to install it as standard on most of their twin engined aircraft.

Alternatively, it gave the co something to do in the cruise that could be destroyed in an instant by the Flt eng switching on the engine anti-icing!
RandomBlah is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 02:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: in the training office
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
whining type noise that occurred when the engines were not in sync
Otherwise known as "The AEO"





Hat, coat rations...
Adam Nams is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 06:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,072
Received 2,940 Likes on 1,252 Posts
As fitted to the VC10 as well.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 08:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 594
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
The secrte is out... To all those co's sorry!!!!!!
fergineer is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 16:23
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ta for that. I'd no idea one had to synchronise jet engines! Or maybe only dH thought one had to.
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 16:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sneaking up on the Runway and leaping out to grab it unawares
Age: 61
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the Dominie, if you didn't synch up the engines (by ear) the Navs would complain rather bitterly about the beat frequency generated down the back.


Then again, if you did synch the engines they'd only find something else to whinge about!
ExAscoteer is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 20:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Can't be the just the AEO, that whining noise seems to occur in many aircraft?

OAP

Last edited by Onceapilot; 10th Nov 2012 at 20:46.
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 20:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the Dominie, if you didn't synch up the engines (by ear) the Navs would complain rather bitterly about the beat frequency generated down the back.
Ho ho, you could tell which staff navs were unpopular. You'd just give on throttle a little tweak to de-synch the donks . . .

More than one way to skin a cat as the saying goes
Dengue_Dude is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 21:50
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 594
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Was that inbetween getting the tuning right on the ADF DD
fergineer is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 22:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Normally, turbojets are not synched, but due to their proximity to the fuselage of the Comet and Nimrod (and therefore the crew/pax) it was considered to be a good idea to do so. No other reason.
kevnurse is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2012, 10:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: home: United Kingdom
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As stated, it did give the co something to do on that long transit from ISK to the Malin!

Duncs
Duncan D'Sorderlee is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2012, 17:29
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Synching

Of course, 'twas only the copilots who needed the "little propellors" to synch those mighty Speys. Most Captains had been educated on the Varsity (two Bristol Hercules Radials) then the Shack (four R-R Griffon V12s) so they could synch four Speys by ear; much easier and much faster.

The Nimrod (Ah! de Havilland!) crews had little patience with pilots who were tone deaf.
Neptunus Rex is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.